TB :Rohit Purohit to quit Imagine's Chandragupta M - Page 2

Originally posted by: lucykaede

you are right bhaaiyaji,bhaddu was the most ablest commander in chief of dhananda so he couldn't be a cameo but whatever they are not following history anyway.

Originally posted by: bhaiyyaji

why u say that arent they following history in current track

Originally posted by: lucykaede

the only thing that is related to history is that cgm lost battle.jo yojna acharya ne banaye the wo sry to say bahut tucche the,haarna to tha he.amatya ne talasshi lene zaruri nahin samzhe acharya ke bed ke jispar wo lete the aur acharya agar dhanu ka itna bada dushman tha to jab usne surrender kiya to dhanu ne maar nahin diya aur phir jab dhuru ne bachaya to uspar waar kyun nahin kiya,agar dhanu ko pata chalta to wo dhuru ko marwa deta including amatya.plus amatyas were never high officers of the state,i don't understand how he advice dhanu,amatyas are not supposed to be advisers of king,prime minister(maha mantri) are advisers of king.amatyas were simply state officers who followed orders of king.sab kuch ulta pulta dikha rahe hain.agar ashu or tiya na pasand hote na muzhe to history butcher karne ke liye mein inhe sue kar dete.😆

Originally posted by: lucykaede

the only thing that is related to history is that cgm lost battle.jo yojna acharya ne banaye the wo sry to say bahut tucche the,haarna to tha he.amatya ne talasshi lene zaruri nahin samzhe acharya ke bed ke jispar wo lete the aur acharya agar dhanu ka itna bada dushman tha to jab usne surrender kiya to dhanu ne maar nahin diya aur phir jab dhuru ne bachaya to uspar waar kyun nahin kiya,agar dhanu ko pata chalta to wo dhuru ko marwa deta including amatya.plus amatyas were never high officers of the state,i don't understand how he advice dhanu,amatyas are not supposed to be advisers of king,prime minister(maha mantri) are advisers of king.amatyas were simply state officers who followed orders of king.sab kuch ulta pulta dikha rahe hain.agar ashu or tiya na pasand hote na muzhe to history butcher karne ke liye mein inhe sue kar dete.😆

Originally posted by: lucykaede

amatyas were officers who used to see after administration of state but they were not higher officers,higher officers were maha mantri,samantas and others.amatyas was not close to dhanu as much they are showing here.they are giving focus to him because he was the one who understood the danger behind chanakya and only him is known because of mudrarakshasa.chanakya jaise logo ko to dhanu puchta tak nahin ta,use koi fikra nahin the chanakya aur chandu ke,use to home revolt mein chandu ke baare mein pata bhe chala tha,acc to history nothing is clear here.nothing is authentic.but one thing is there acc to sources it is written that actually chandu was commander in chief of dhanu and soon he became famous in army and people.dhanu started seeing him as danger and tried to kill him but he escaped.acc to this thing chandu never met chanakya in his childhood,he met him when he was already a grown up.there are diff stories regarding his of chandu.no one knows what actually happened.

Originally posted by: bhaiyyaji

yes but the story u telling links to fact that chandu was illegitimate child of nandas but the other view is he was from morya clan and was an orphan. they showing him here as kshatriye thats why they showing that CGM met chankya in his childhood, most sources go there rather than the other. majority also believe he was kshatriye rather than illegitimate child of nadas. also that would contradict another fact whether dhara was dhana daughter coz if this was shown dhara and chandu would be step brother/sister😕

and the people who believe he is from kshatriye clan says he got his education from taxila which cant be when he was fully grown. maybe it could be he was teenager.

anther thing on facebook one person says dhara was daugther of some king whose name is with U if u search i think u will get it.