Originally posted by: upra
@Astha- I can also say ki Simar ne toh Roli ko woh mauka bhi nahi diya. Simar sympathizers are expecting Roli not to beleive the evidence just because she did not witness the incident, but what about Simar.,.what did she do? She acted on assumptions. Had Simar trusted Roli the 1st time during the heater incident the sisters may still be together today. Roli is angry because Simar has committed a big mistake but Roli did not do anything like that so what reason does Simar have to be angry with Roli. I refuse to believe that simar is acting on assumption. Roli has always been prank master. So she just misunderstood her. She thought even this time roli is playing some prank. But simar never tried to play with important documents of roli in her life still without her witness she is going on and on. she knows her sister very well still Just becoz she is angry on simar due to slap and heater stuff she dont has any right to point finger until and unless she is not sure. And she found the documents in simar's room not in her hand or purse. And she even knows her jeethanis very well. She is more experienced than simar in cruelty of jeethani still it was not hard for her to point simar so easily.
To answer your maturity question the sisters are in this soup because Simar was immature & not Roli. Roli is still being mature about it. Simar is the one who is still being immature and running behind Roli. Thats the difference. Blood relation dont end with slap,heater and creams. She is running behind roli because roli is not leaving any chance to insult and degrade her. She cant tolerate so much.
Just because you are a Simar sympathizer does not make Roli negative. People who prefer Roli can tell that Simar is the one at fault and potentially even negative from the way she had behaved with Roli. If Simar is innocent in your POV, Roli is as well plus a victim as well.
Just because u r roli fan doesnt mean roli is innocent. I m calling her negative on the base of her action not because i like to call her negative. In this entire matter simar is victim. It was a plan to trap simar like hell. She never enjoyed while slapping roli.
We can go back & forth about Roli's negativity but I will never believe that Roli is negative and none of Roli's fans will believe that either and sorry to be rude but it seems like you are trying to shove it down our throat at this time. I dont find u rude as we r discussing about simar and roli. For me rude means getting personal in drama. Feel free to express anything what u feel but only about serial not on actors specially with me. I m just expressing my view, atleast i m not bashing roli or simar like others. And honestly i m finding my self enough decent. Sorry if u r finding it offensive.
The audience is passionately divided Simar's fans are loyal to her and Roli's to hers and lets leave it that.
Had Simar stood up for herself then she would not be in this soup.
Every pesrson makes mistake and have to repent for it later. Same way with simar. It was her fault that she never stood up for herself when it was right time. But its better to be late than never. Now she is standing for herself. Thank God that she didnt spared manoranjan on the name of goodness and relation. She was so keen to expose her but here she dont know about mataji so for mataji she gave her chance. I m expecting good action after knowing mataji's truth.