Nature Vs. Nurture - Page 2

Originally posted by: Justlikethat1

Sorry to digress from the main topic.. But @Bold I do not agree.. Maybe before marriage Gopi would have made the sacrifice. But after that, she would never do it. She will leave Aham if she thinks it would make him happy but she will not put anyone else in above him, even Koki..

Originally posted by: ritika-gohem

Nice post. I feel my knowledge for psychology is increasing here on this forum.

Originally posted by: munnihyderabad

very nice post roopal👏 loved it.. discussed it with hubby... awesome post

my take😃

Nature Vs Nurture has been a very long and debatable topic for over many many years and still being studied...

- Nature:
Nature does have an integral role that is being proved scientifically...but not completely...to conflict that we have

-Karna born to good people Kunti and Sun god, turned to be evil due to nurture or rather friendship from dhuryodana (here he is on the wrong side due to his friendship...)
- Similarly Bharata of Ramayan is born to a very selfish and self centered woman kaikeyi, here dasharatha also just gave into his wifes' words (we can see jithu here...not fighting or standing up)...but bharatha was a selfless and loving brother. (here he got his goodness from his brothers and teachers)

- all these terrorists... their parents need not be evil,,,, but they were affected by the society or friends..so now we take a look at nurture

Nurture:
-Rashi has gone to school, college, in that case she spends less than 10 % time with her mom in a day..and more time with friends
-she is exposed to lot many factors than gopi, she is faced with good (gopi) and evil (urmi) and friends as well - here she chose to be evil
- here we may note, the time being spent with urmi(10% of her day) may be more than the time spent with gopi...but she spent most of her time out in school/college with friends
-society has good and bad in it , it throws u with both in equal amounts..it's ur choice what u want to take from it
-Gopi has always stayed home(urmi) and in mandir(panditji)...she is exposed to both good and evil, she chose to be good

-there is nothing like forcing a person to be good or bad...unless in extreme cases (like terrorist groups) ..
- so that leads to choice of what want u want to be

Choice/decision/intellect/conscience
-Rashi chose to be bad, because it is easy way of getting what you want..Her conscience or intellect never warned her when doing bad
- Gopi sticked to goodness, how much ever it might be difficult to hold on to it...her conscience and intellect does not allow her to do or think bad

My Conclusion: (purely my opinion)
-At the end , it is nothing but Rashi's conscience is which is to be blamed...
-Nature, Nurture has it's share..but at the end of the day ..she is a human being (very inhuman in nature) with intellect to differentiate good and bad and she is soley responsible for everything

- i do not blame urmi or jithu for her being evil...it's rashi who is to be blamed solely as she has to think what is right and wrong

- now don't say rashi does not have intelligence and she is getting affected .. when she does not have intelligence...how is she thinking, planning and executing all the kalakries...

-she is intelligent enough to think about good and bad... but she chose to be bad at the end

P.S:very very sorry for the long rant... couldn't fit this in a small para😉