As of now , dinanath is @ safe haven...if mohan's news affects judgment , amar wd b scapegoated...if the news turns out 2 b faulty,then mohan wd b scapegoated...
Mohan shd assess this..normally no media can publish without authentication of proofs(attested by koyal) ...without this , they can at the most express doubt on amar's role along with others,because koyal can never attend the court to validate the correctness of the docs she gave to mohan ...
The question is not the right/wrong dilemma ...of mohan ...
But of the validity & accountability of the proofs he got..
if megha's lawyer questions mohan , if he can prove that they are not cooked as
(1) he did know amar's signature,in the first instance & how can he guarantee that the signature cd not b forgeried?
(2) why mohan left all the government officials who r actually responsible to get the materials tested & certified after which only they shd give a written permission to amar to take up on construction on that day?
(3) the bad material wd b purchased by the puchase/procurement dept of dinanath & wd eventually b tested by QC dept of dinanath & then submits it to govt to certify & give permission for construction.In this transaction,if anyone is profited for puchasing the bad material it wd b dinanath only & never Amar...
(4) had mohan verified the signature in a forensic lab & has a report that has verified other factors like amar's finger prints are also on it?
(5) had mohan approached govt depts through RTI so that he has the authentic info regarding the role of govt officials in granting permissions ?
(6) first of all does mohan think that a single entity like amar can do whatever he want on his own...?no project will have a single accountability...had mohan ever tried to find out the other accountables in delivering the quality project,like govt QC dept (nit/JNTU) & PMC consultant apart from govt side executive engineer?
Edited by sreevask - 14 years ago