Originally posted by: driftingaway
no not really. How have they promoted independence or equality or freedom of speech in anyway? If anything, they are showing some warped perception of how education and knowledge is not of any importance to women (Sandhya being constantly taunted and being subjected to snide remarks for being an educated women in almost every single episode.) Why is her education such a hurdle, why is it being portrayed as a barrier/something negative?
Has Sandhya, the main protagonist of the show, ever told Bhabho to cut it out and attempted to explain the importance of an education, in a firm manner? No. All Sandhya does is make a 'painstricken' expression shed tears, and apologise. Apologise for what exactly? For allowing her parents to equip her with important lifeskills through an education? For wasting her life away by trying to live with uncouth/immoral people like Bhabho? *shrugs shoulders*
Morever, the storyplot is such that now Sandhya has to PROVE that she is worthy of being a daughterinlaw as if being well read makes her inept or something? Im not indian, ive never been to india, ive grown up on bollywood, and wow watching shows like DABH and Pratigya just makes me ponder ... damn India sure is regressive. 😲 So forward technology wise but then they have backward shows like DABH airing on starplus with top viewership. What does that say of the viewers who watch shows like this?
There are so many other shows on starplus that 'claim' to raise social awareness but if anything glamourise things like domestic abuse, polygamy, and now we have DABH that is almost 'anti education'. Have you seen how unrealistic these shows are? Its like all the main protagonists are carbon copies of each other. They are gutless and 'endure' everything as if it is the right thing to do. they're all Tulsi/Parvati/Prerna's! If there is any show that is actually worth watching and attempts to raise social awareness it is Maryada. Unfortunately, shows like Maryada dont get the attention and praise they actually deserve.
Sorry for butting into the middle of the conversation like this, but I just wanted to add my two cents.
There are shows that are regressive, they glamorize physical abuse and stuff, but DABH is certainly not one of them.
Glamorizing is when the wrong thing is shown as right, which is definitely not the case here. Anyone who watches Bhabo's actions can figure out that she's not correct, because the show is portraying her as a bad person, an obstacle to Sandhya's dream. When the creatives start portraying Bhabho as the right/morally correct person in all of this drama, then it would be considered glamorizing.
^I'm not saying the show might not become what you mentioned in the future, but at the moment, it's not regressive. It's the opposite, if you ask me. Because it is definitely raising awareness, it is telling you of a story that depicts a reality, even if exaggerated as hell. It would've been regressive if Bhabo's actions were glorified/glamorized, which is not the case here.
And plus, the show has two sides. One, we have one side where the whole city was proud of Sandhya's achievements, where as Bhabho took it as in insult. Sandhya's parents had encouraged her to study, to get an education so she could be independent, while Bhabho is the complete opposite. I think the show is just trying to show the two kinds of people (the regressive aka bhabo/bhabo's family, and the progressive aka sandhya's family/the city).
^ Once again, I'm not trying to say that Sandhya was right in not speaking up, definitely not. Hell, I was pissed when I saw that she was crying like an idiot the entire time. And what makes it worse is that Suraj is not even supporting her in this. Well, he is..but not as much as he should've been. When he married Sandhya, he took on the responsibility of another person. He should be supporting her truly in all of this, but he's not. I keep changing directions, sorry! okay, back to the original point. I'm just trying to say that the show is not regressive, it's not spreading the wrong message, in my opinion.
Pratigya would be considered regressive, definitely. It wasn't that way in the beginning, but it slowly turned towards another direction somewhere in the duration of the show. The show lost its theme and purpose, after the first two months or so.
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon would also fall into the list. Actually, that would be the one show that would certainly fall into the regressive/glamorizing list. The main character was physically abused(by the other main character aka the 'love of her life') and yet, there were people who were completely supporting whatever he was doing. Hell, they actually liked that he held her to abusively, because it's "passionate". That, would be glamorizing. When even physical abuse is shown as 'passionate' and desirable, even, then the audience will start thinking that as the truth.
and I definitely agree about the 'all of the protagonists are carbon copies of each other'!! It always feels like I'm watching the same character on screen even if I switch shows :D
p.s. this definitely turned out longer than intended. sorry?
Edited by stillunwritten - 13 years ago