why not censor SUNNY LEONE?

lippi thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#1

This is very much of a valid point.

Bringing her into the show means giving her popularity amongst the community.

Popularity will mean that people will search for her on the net!

Considering the job that she does...it's not very appropriate for children to be getting involved in this kind of stuff. 😡


http://www.india-forums.com/tellybuzz/buzzin-hot/10816-why-censor-facebook-when-you-dont-censor-sunny-leone.htm
Edited by lippi - 13 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

8

Views

3.4k

Users

8

Likes

15

Frequent Posters

-Moderator- thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#2
I noticed that timesofindia,com ( a leading newspaper website) has those nude pics of veena malik and articles containing vulger language on their front page. I know this site is meant for all age groups and wondering how can you really stop kids from accessing that kind of information ? Those kids who surf internet frequently usually are used to those pop-up windows with pics which should be really censored. Those kids who watched Pamela Anderson last year, do you think they searched for her leaked sex tape too ? or ashmits MMS leaked video ? 😕

The point raised in that link is valid but censoring sunny leone is not the solution. Looking at Sunny's popularity, veena malik already showed what she is capable of and probably Mahesh Bhat might cast veena now is Jism-2. Now wait for Poonam Pandey to prove that she is better than sunny 😉 And kids are going to read these kind of article everywhere on leading news related websites.

Sunny is already here and famous so censoring her will only give her more popularity 😳
return_to_hades thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 13 years ago
#3

Honestly, I don't get the logic of the argument in the article. It is attempting to draw a parallel between two separate and disparate issues.

The reason censorship of Facebook is being considered is due to the numerous numbers of inflammatory messages. It is akin to the reason why China censors the internet (subduing anti-government groups) or Pakistan censors the internet (subduing anti-Islamic content). It has less to do with censorship of harmful material (illicit drug sales, child po*nography) and everything to do with trampling of free speech (shutting out 'unwanted' voices).

The other thing that defeats logic is how do you 'censor' a person. Basically censorship by definition means editing out content that is offensive or unsuitable for audiences. Sunny Leone is a person. Personhood in itself is neither offensive nor unsuitable for audiences. You simply cannot 'censor' people. How do you go about determining what person ought to be 'censored' in what context. Suppose if Sunny Leone was hit by a drunk Salman in an accident, do we 'delete' Sunny from the news? Suppose Sunny Leone made a million dollar donation to Anna Hazare's campaign, do we delete the donor from the news.

Moreover how do we determine what internet search will lead to objectionable content - Just think of the news and newspapers, you see things like rape, murder, war, genocide etc. If you google any of these words or the people in these news stories, you will be led to graphic sex and violence unsuitable for people. Then there is the fiend Photoshop. There are dozens of Photoshopped po*nographic images out there of popular actors and actresses. There are leaked sex tapes, leaked home videos or illegally obtained photes.

There is no such thing as safe sites. Even with filters, you could run into objectionable content. Lets just stick too good old fashioned censorship shall we please, the way censorship was meant to be. No tits or vags on television channels except for the ill 'timed' wardrobe malfunctions during live shows. No public lewdness or offensive content, do as you will on your private internets.

EmAsh thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#4
Someone should banned your post. People like you don't make sense to me. Is po*n star or strippers or prostitute aren't human? They are way better then your Indian politics. Professional life is professional, it doesn't defined how you are as human. Your govt. steal money from their own people, they are corrupted. They feed people like Kasab. They don't mind when venna malik have nude photo shoot.
lippi thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: EmAsh

Someone should banned your post. People like you don't make sense to me. Is po*n star or strippers or prostitute aren't human? They are way better then your Indian politics. Professional life is professional, it doesn't defined how you are as human. Your govt. steal money from their own people, they are corrupted. They feed people like Kasab. They don't mind when venna malik have nude photo shoot.



I'd rather not reply to people like you, but the fact you have pointed at me has led me to write this reply.

Its a free forum, everyone has the right to express their opinion and so do I.

You're not a moderator. You are no one to make decisions about who's post should be banned and who's post shouldn't be banned.

Back to Sunny, If she was a prostitute, I would have much more sympathy for her!

As far as my morals are concerned, a person who decides to take up this profession does not deserve any sympathy. I feel sorry for her parents who may be hiding their face with shame.

She wants to take up this profession, she can do with all her wish!! But giving her popularity in a country like India is wrong!

Many youngsters are not even aware of the word po*nstar but thanks to MISS SUNNY LEONE, they are all loosing their innocence.

It is natural for any person watching a Reality show to search for a contestant they may like. And what will come up when they search for Sunny??

And where the question comes of Veena Malik and Poonam Panday. I think it is very wrong to compare them with Sunny. Don't know about Poonam but Veena was a much better contestant than Sunny. Sunny is two-faced and a bully supporter!!

I have not seen any videos of Veena or Poonam on youtube that reveals their personal life on the bed. There is no comparison between them.
Fossil2 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#6
basically, acco to BB, it is perfectly okay to bring in a po*n star from abroad.. but when she introduces herself it should appear to TV viewers like this: "hello I am sunny leone, I am a (beep) actress and I have acted in several (beep) movies"


thayani2007 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#7
Channel does not have guts to show what Sunny Spoke. Sunny makes have living showing her body - it is her life. The way she screamed that she is ... and if someone likes it they can and if not she doesn't care. Her body language changed and it looked she was frowning within. SKY immediately hugged her because he wants to improve his career graph and probably Sunny promised him. When they can bring in a po*n actor and make PM advise her and also Sanjay Dutt instigating her to tell the truth indicates that they wanted good TRPs. Atleast now they should show the clipping instead of Beep sound.
natasha.princes thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#8
she just sucks... hate her
AngryBird thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#9


Why don't you censor Bollywood first? Rot starts here right at home! :)

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".