eye witness vs. circumstantial evidence

tinoo thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#1
it is obvious that one of the bhakths who is disturbed about karmanand will suddenly speak up.
Good for him - and that will sway the case.
However, it was surprising how quickly anandi was dismissed today on grounds that she was presenting circumstantial evidence and not eye witnessed evidence.
If there was no bhakth in the picture -- then how exactly would anandi proceed?
I think her lack of research would actually have gone against her and that asha would end up in jail instead for defaming the sadhu...
and this is what anandi needs to understand about having an education and getting out of the damn haveli.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".