Achha guys, tell me one thing. Seemed like both Jagya and Gauri were asking for Gauri's rights as a child bride. Both of them kept addressing their argument to Dadisa, stressing on the fact that they were already married by Dadisa in their childhood and thus Gauri should be accepted as the rightful bahu. Even today Gauri kept stressing the fact that she was deprived of her rights as a child bride and she had to live with that trauma, so now she needs to be rightfully accepted.
So what is the argument? Is Gauri claiming rights on the basis of her current marriage or the previous marriage? Seems like both of them were harping on the child marriage only😒 So what exactly is the issue here: child marriage bigamy and the rights of the second child bride?
Jagya's choice is thus valid only because J &G are already sanctioned through child marriage?? 😲