Torturing of suspects and criminals - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

22

Views

2.2k

Users

10

Likes

12

Frequent Posters

576345 thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

Interesting questions.

It often is like a logic problem to deduce, who is plotting what, with whom, against whom, where, how, why and to what effect. If one could torture out a solution to a logic problem, then so be it, that's the only recourse. I'm inclined to think that intelligence is the better way of solving this logical nightmare. Not because I have any sympathy for evil doers, but simply because I don't think we can really torture a solution out of anyone.


The experts seem to think that torture doesn't produce useful information: https://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/05/interrogation-experts-from-every-branch-of-the-military-and-intelligence-agree-torture-doesnt-produce-useful-information/

I suppose we could safely assume that the experts know more than we do so how about taking torture off the table and substituting it with "use of force"? And if not use of force, what other viable options are available?

I guess the question boils down to which takes precedence? Protecting your nation by any and all means necessary OR protecting human rights whether or not the human in question belongs to your nation or not. What would one do if one is the commander-in-chief entrusted with the security of the nation?


Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#22

Originally posted by: ..kiran..

I personally think it's completely unacceptable. What's the difference between lawbreakers and lawmakers then?

I understand the utilitarian argument, that places the good of the most number of people over the bad done to one person.
But I disagree, because nothing can justify torture. No matter who does it and for what reasons. What's wrong is wrong. People have dignity, even the worst of terrorists are people with real emotions, just like you and I. Some would not even be evil, just supremely misguided. And nobody is completely bad, just like nobody is all good.
The worst part with these torture tactics is, there doesn't really seem to be any set procedure, or limits. Or if there are, I hardly think there is an effective checking mechanism.
I think the second video Summer3 posted is the one I think it is (I didn't want to watch because I found it disturbing enough the few times I did). Clearly, so many would abuse their powers and think it justified. This is just one incident that was leaked. I don't think it's far-fetched to hypothesise that there are many many more incidents out there. The whole secretive nature of this thing conveniently allows soldiers and whoever it is to just do whatever they like. Probably even as we speak, as you're reading this.
And the fact that many of these tortured suspects (some of them overly brutally tortured) are innocent! Everybody is so terrorised by the idea of terror that they'd just report any suspicious anything. And there you have it, a life ruined, a person's dignity stripped.
Some would say, 1 innocent down, but hey we got 10 real terrorists. I think everytime an innocent is condemned, or worse, killed by torture, before he could have been proven guilty, there's a huge unjustifiable failing of the law system. It's like a bit of humanity dies with that one innocent person. (I got that line from somewhere, but I'm not sure where. It just stuck because it makes so much sense to me)
Okay, maybe I am too idealistic. Maybe I should be practical. Maybe I should say, the 10 real terrorists are a good catch. The whole "humanity dies", "dignity, etc" thing - it's just words, just rhetoric. We have to make the world a better place, and a few sacrifices here and there are unfortunate but necessary.
But even practically, my feeling is that everytime 1 innocent goes down, 10 other innocents become terrorists. The whole system and the unfairness and brutality of it creates such fury among people that the best of them resort to violence because it seems to be all the world has come down to.
The terrorists didn't spring up from nowhere. Yes, they are wrong, insane, cruel, and all of that. I don't want to defend what they do, because there is nothing that can just justify such acts. I will never endorse such a thing. All the lives lost, families ruined, all because of some sick agenda. Really horrible.
But they are after all normal people. It is circumstances that have shaped them. The US has been interfering in the Middle East for the past century (and is continuing to do so, largely for political and oil-related reasons). That's where the Taliban terrorists came from. I hardly think it was a random, "hey let's jihad, guys!" thought that popped out of nowhere. It was resentment that had been boiling for so long due to various injustices that they had been subjected to that has turned into an anger so wild they have become almost animal-like, devoid of emotions and rationality.
That's done. It's quite certain that nothing can be done to make them realise how wrong this whole thing is. Rehabilitation sounds absolutely ridiculous in the light of what they have done and how far they have gone. They completely deserve to be punished, to be brought to justice. And I am all for that.
But I really feel the current system is perpetrating the vicious terrorism cycle, creating more terrorists everyday, by causing more resentment and anger in people. And practically, that doesn't work.
On the level of principles, even less so. The very essence of justice is being perverted, supposedly in the interests of justice. I think violence is the last thing we need in the world today.

Ah you have the heart of Buddha.So basically your view is violence begets violence.
Perhaps violence should be the last resort.
If we go too easy on the criminals our prisons will be full. some deterrent is necessary but we do not have to be barbaric. Some US soldiers killed themselves being unable to withstand the tortures of prisoners being carried out in the Middle East wars.
So I believe you are against capital punishment.
People commit crimes due to a variety of reasons but in some cases some of them have mental problems or chemical imbalance and will not respond to treatment and are repeat offenders. In such cases they have to review case by case.
_Angie_ thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#23

Originally posted by: K.Resurrected.

I suppose we could safely assume that the experts know more than we do so how about taking torture off the table and substituting it with "use of force"? And if not use of force, what other viable options are available?

I guess the question boils down to which takes precedence? Protecting your nation by any and all means necessary OR protecting human rights whether or not the human in question belongs to your nation or not. What would one do if one is the commander-in-chief entrusted with the security of the nation?

A question fit for the devil himself . But as they say an idle mind is a devils workshop...no wonder the devil never gets bored . So lets get him working .😈

Option 1- CIC who loves evil with a passion

Action preferred- Use all the torture methods available whether you get anything useful out of the suspect or not. Enjoys the spectre.

Option 2- CIC who loves evil but not with a passion

Action preferred- Torture the suspect 'evaluate efficacy- increase the intensity- re-evaluate...

Doesnt enjoy the spectre but goes about it in a stoic manner.

Option 3- CIC who does not love evil and neither is passionate about the nation

Action preferred- detain the suspect hoping and praying that he would eventually relent and spill

He does not care much about the outcome. Its all in the hands of providence.

Which of the 3 CIC do you identify with? Those who do can stop here. Those who dont can explore further.

Option 4- CIC who hates evil with a passion ,

Action that should be preferred: Use of technology .

No increase the WL in karma points, saves his soul and nation both.

1- Mind reading devices ' https://www.livescience.com/7718-mind-reading-device-sends-twitter-messages.html

2- Narco analysis with or without hypnosis or polygraph testing (has its share of skeptics)

With some fine tuning I think the former can be used to solve the above dilemma. Some misgivings regarding liberty and ethics would still haunt the queasy.

Edited by angie.4u - 14 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".