Interesting Article on Aishwarya Rai

poppy2009 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#1
https://sify.com/finance/aishwarya-rai-limited-imagegallery-others-klgpQzeaibc.html
Aishwarya Rai has an 'adjective' problem. She is reportedly the highest paid actress in Indian cinema with her pick of the best roles, banners and directors. Each of her movies in 2010 - Raavan, Robot, the recently released Action Replayy, and soon to premiere Guzaarish - is a five-star production that most actresses can only dream about. This is the face that has launched a thousand magazine articles, and yet not one word in them reveals the woman behind that immaculate visage.

Nearly two decades of constant media attention later, she remains a glittering icon, more symbolic than real, defined entirely by how she looks. "I don't know of anyone who is crazy about Aishwarya," says filmmaker and critic Paromita Vohra. "[Hers] is a sort of empirical or quantitative success, by virtue of ticking off all the correct surface qualities." And that perfect 'surface' is all that everyone talks about.

Her leading men tend to be oddly laconic in their compliments. Take, for example, Hrithik Roshan, an actor with whom the reigning Bollywood queen shares true celluloid chemistry.

Earlier this year, Roshan described the lowly Kangana Ranaut as 'an incredible actor' with 'no ego' whose 'spirit and enthusiasm is infectious'. Yet in a recent interview promoting Guzaarish, Hrithik Roshan was more reserved: 'She is one of my favourite co-actors. Ash and I have proven to be a 100 per cent success.'

Her Action Replayy co-star, Akshay Kumar, worked just as hard at saying very little. Describing the experience as 'interesting', he added, 'it's also refreshing to work with someone with whom I have not worked with for a while.'

Rai's staunchest admirers tend to damn her with impersonal praise. Directors and dance choreographers rave about her 'work ethic', while fans laud her 'dignity' and 'poise'. The most her own husband can do is describe her as 'a true professional'. At best, she's a perfect looking, perfectly behaved actress, a model of good behaviour than a flesh-and-blood woman of substance. 'Perfection can be its own curse; it may be admirable but not appealing,' says author Sanjay Suri.
Ash's critics, on the other hand, have no problem in getting specific and personal - accusing her of being all 'surface', all the time. She's been attacked as 'fake', 'manipulative', and 'self-obsessed'; a 'cosmetic wonder' with an 'impeccable hype record'. In comparison, her most vigorous defenders only get personal when they attack her attackers.

'Throughout her career, the media has painted Aishwarya as 'plastic', an 'ice-maiden', 'wooden', 'artificial' and a 'non-actress'. This, despite the fact that she has acted in more than 40 films ... entered the industry as an outsider, without a godfather. Today her face is more recognised globally than any other Indian actor,' rants author Chetan Bhagat, accusing her critics of 'Ash envy'.

Not that we are envious, but she is merely successful, a descriptor devoid of any emotive attribute. No one defends Aishwarya as funny, kind, goofy, or sweet (or even temperamental and complicated) - except for Rai herself, who has long fronted a giggly, nice girl persona in all her interviews, perhaps in compensation for this lingering silence.
Yet the actress's best efforts to convince us otherwise have come to nigh, and for good reason. Even the most unfair criticism is bolstered by a very real lacuna of personality that has come to define Rai's movie career.

Her screen presence seems to lack a certain human essence, a signature quality that a great star brings to each of her roles. Rekha, for example, exudes a tempestuous sensuality, whether playing a courtesan, housewife, or matriarch, as opposed to Madhuri Dixit's effervescent sex appeal, Kajol's spunky independence or Rani Mukherjee's girl-next-door sincerity. This unique quality gives nuance, depth, and texture to each of their roles. It makes us, the viewers, both love the character on the screen and the person who makes her real.
'Movies are powerful because they create a sense of intimacy. In the dark confines of the theatre, the viewer feels connected to the actor, begins to feel like he knows him or her,' says film historian Theodore Bhaskaran.

With Rai, no such connection is possible because she emits nothing. In each of her films, she is a blank cipher wreathed in perfect clothes and lighting, without the tell-tale, ragged edges of the human presence behind the mask. As Gertrude Stein said famously of the city of Oakland, 'There's no there there.'

A reason why one BBC reviewer notes, 'the incandescent beauty and artistry of Aishwarya does indeed keep the audience watching, though not necessarily emotionally engaged'.

In the place of self is static which she flails to disguise by over-acting. As she rightly boasts, Rai favours character-driven roles, lavish period productions, and talented directors, but more so in the hope that they may help camouflage that lack of affect. Much of the invective hurled at her acting - plastic, robotic, wooden - is but a futile attempt to explain that puzzling absence.
Whether she's playing a Rajput princess or holding a press conference, Rai's public avatar is a gleaming, polished surface that deflects all attempts at intimacy.

All we're left with is her undeniable physical perfection, which however eye-popping does not elicit frail, mortal desire. 'She's someone you'd want to behold, not hold. She is like crystal, the finest piece you might find at Swarovski,' says Suri.

'But she is all appearance, and the appearance itself overwhelms her and those who look at her so very much that she cannot be allowed to be anything but her appearance.' Yet it's that flawless, upmarket 'appearance' that reflects the true aspiration of new India: to be beheld in speechless admiration.

As long as Rai remains picture-perfect, we'll never tire of looking at her. She is, after all, the prettiest trophy mounted on the walls of our rising, shining India.

Created

Last reply

Replies

21

Views

4.3k

Users

18

Likes

49

Frequent Posters

lovanika thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#2
Well...what can I say....but to survive in this world for such a long time and gain respect of people is not just thanks to her pretty face....
Edited by lovanika - 15 years ago
233283 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#3
This article basically sums up my thoughts on Aishwarya. I have tried very hard to like her over the years but it just does not happen. I like her for a little while after watching movies like Raincoat, Provoked et al...but then its back to square one again. Her personality is so alien, non-human....she just does not react. Its like a brick wall....very hard to connect to. Yea, I've never heard even her own husband say anything personal about her other than the usual euphemisms-good wife, good actress, good daughter...blah blah. What gives????
BheegiBasanti thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 15 years ago
#4
Interesting...I agree with the author's perspective!
ibelieveinpink thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 15 years ago
#5
Worst article ever!! I disagree to the core!!
bollywoodbabe1 thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#6
I also totally disagree with this article!
Edited by bollywoodbabe1 - 15 years ago
Enycedoll thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#7
the journo lost all credibility when he said 'lowly kangana'...that is not how you want to convince ur reader of your point..didnt even bother reading past that line.
Edited by Enycedoll - 15 years ago
mademoiselle1 thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#8
Nailed it.. all i would like to add is that my heart isn't large enough to be her fan.. i could never be a fan of a celeb who never seems warm enough.. never seems to reach out to people..never cracks a joke.. lol.. doesn't have a funny side.. doesn't make extra effort to connect to fans.. is not vulnerable..does not seem like someone who makes mistakes. does.not seem earthy...doesn not flatter the audience or ever try to understand them.. i would say yes even though the relationship between a star a fan is not the most truest one.. but still whatever theories people might have as to how every celeb is fake.. but i like watching celebs who are vulnerable.. who make an extra effort to connect to fans.. who talk about their mistakes.. life.. and all.. who go an extra mile to flatter the audience.. who make me feel.. yaar hai.. yeh to bohot bada celeb hai.. par phir bhi dil hai hindustani..lol.. simple.. earthy whatnot.. i try not to be selfish.. but for me.. i don't care if a celeb has the most beautiful face in the world.. for me.. if a celeb even after reaching the biggest heights.. does those simple things to woo the audience.. then that celeb rocks!!!
Edited by mademoiselle1 - 15 years ago
sentimentalfool thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#9
I disagree with this article completely. For example, I have never connected with someone like Kajol at all onscreen-she is so OTT and a turn off. I connect with Aishwarya in all her movies. It all depends on your own cinematic experience I guess.
31609 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#10
i disagree with this article too...I connect quite well to aishwarya onscreen.......the "ice maiden" tag is such a stereotype and seems to be stuck with her forever...but acc to me, she tries out different things and tries to keep the audience engaged by giving them "a new aishwarya" in every film.....just when u thought she was taking herself too seriously with gurus, jodhaa akbars and raavans, she goes and does robot and action replay....i dunt say all of her roles work, neither do i say she performs well in all of them...but the point is...she attempts to be different in each film of hers and that effort is very much worthy of appreciation because she tries to give the audience something fresh each time.

As far as her acting goes....i always found her decent...infact gr8 in films like guru, HDDCS, raincoat etc...she bought a lot of realism and conviction to those roles. She does have a screen presence...if kajol's spunky, rani girl next doorsy, then ash also has a very elegant, "todays-indian-woman" kinda vibe abt her onscreen.

i hate it when ppl attribute a superstar's success to just a singular thing....oh kats successful coz shes got salman or shes lucky, ash's successful coz shes got looks....a big BOO to such comments because success is never about having a single thing in ur favour....there are many more things which contribute towards it and yes...failure, hardwork and struggle are integral. Everyone who is successful in the industry today, totally deserves to be where they are.

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 24 days ago

https://x.com/i/status/2015979260247474489

https://x.com/i/status/2015979260247474489
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: Rosyme · 1 months ago

Aanand L Rai and Dhanush to reunite for a period action romance after Tere Ishk Mein? | Hindustan Times...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 21 days ago

Hrithik Roshan and Aishwarya Rai cute advertisement This is so cute it could have been a movie...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: mintyblue · 29 days ago

You know that moment in Chand Chhupa Badal Mein — when she slowly lifts her dupatta and looks at Salman? That’s the exact kind of beauty I’m...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".