Let's talk about right, and rights. - Page 4

Originally posted by: Dyehard

Yes Pooja, his IS a ruthless decision. Yes it is making life tough for the Saxes, and for Kriya. But he does not care. Because he is more concerned with his duty and image as a Police officer and he does not mind if the Saxes cut off the rishta. He has to make a choice and he has made a clear choice. How can we say that a person does not have the right to make a choice? He is also offering a similar choice to other people and it is up to them to make it. he is NOT kind, but he has a right, I am trying to make that distinction here! Have I been able to say that lucidly?😕😃

I can see what u are saying Dye...but I still don't think he has the right to force the saxenas to choose between the two families...Nobody is forcing him to bond with the thakurs...but he can't force the saxenas to do the same as well by making them choose ....thanks to the condition!! 😊

Originally posted by: pragati.tankha

u r surprising me day by day..............🤣 don't behave soo much intellegently.......😆😆

what u want me to always have behooda chats?? 😲😲🤣

Originally posted by: SaacheeSyna

what u want me to always have behooda chats?? 😲😲🤣

exactly...at last u undersatnd..........

Dyehard

Beautifully written !!!

I completely agree with you while Krisha anger was justified, that does not give him the right to manhandle his wife especially without trying to understand her state of mind, The poor girl will loose no matter who she supports, on one side saving her sisters marraige by agreeing to the Mathurs condition which was not at all acceptable especially when that deprives a sister from attending her younger sisters wedding, and the other side her husband's respect, both are equally important in her eyes and she has done nothing but made an effort to balance these issues without hurting her loved ones while her suffering has been conveniently overlooked !!!

Originally posted by: Binny1247

Dyehard

Beautifully written !!!

I completely agree with you while Krisha anger was justified, that does not give him the right to manhandle his wife especially without trying to understand her state of mind, The poor girl will loose no matter who she supports, on one side saving her sisters marraige by agreeing to the Mathurs condition which was not at all acceptable especially when that deprives a sister from attending her younger sisters wedding, and the other side her husband's respect, both are equally important in her eyes and she has done nothing but made an effort to balance these issues without hurting her loved ones while her suffering has been conveniently overlooked !!!

Bingo 👍🏼 but is it that simple? why Krishna is blaming her, with which face he is expecting to go the wedding, whereas he had even refused to go inside the saxes and mathur's house, even before knowing this condition. And that too after his heated confrontation at the sagai.

Krishna should be the one to refuse to go to the wedding not the other way around. 😕