Originally posted by: Omshanti1111
Its said People make themselves unique through two ways...one is by birth (being born in a reputed family) or by karma (by actions). It saddened me to read a comment that Anmol never did anything for Rajvanshs, though I have read many comments like this about Sadhna also before. Its nothing new. I even enriched myself reading cthatharacters like Sadhna are too good to believe and thus not reliable.
Both Anmol and Sadhna are not original Rajvanshs, but their contributions to the Rajvansh clan is tremendous. Anmol Sareen could have easily turned down his dying friend's wish and settled for a family with no burdens and must have got enough respect. By accepting the Rajvansh surname, he gained nothing except daily insults. Similarly, by getting Rajvansh name,Sdahna also got her mamaji's house released and got all sort of tensions from Vasundhra Rajvansh, a so called TRUE rajvansh.
Anmol or Sadhna like people act from behind, they never say "I did", they pass their credit to others, they act from back and provide a solid support and make the lives of their family secure. Today, what Anmol is doing, Alekh as a Rajvansh should have done, taken control of the family. Rather, Alekh was so weak, he became abnormal and passed on his daughter's responsibility even to Anmol and Ragini...
who is a true Rajvansh...Alekh, Vasu, Inder or Anmol...what is in a Rajvansh title...is it a Noble Prize? To me, it seems more like a torture being married to a family where there is a Rajvansh like Vasundhara Rajvansh?
Really sad, that people like Anmol or Sadhna were and are targetted, just because they do not boast that "maine yeh kiya". Anmol is the one holding the family, he protected a young woman Rgaini, he gave a name and love of a father to Tammy, he is doing what all Alekh should have done to the family...if Alekh was normal to bear the responsibility, there was no need of anmol for the family.