who is a true Rajvansh? - Page 2

Bani Me and Sammy analyszed it too the one in bold

Not if Anmol would have called Ragini his sister 🤣

Excuse me for the PATHETIC joke. Couldn't keep shut, lolzzz. 😆

Originally posted by: Omshanti1111

your answer is very right...but Karan himself made his exit saying that he did not want to stay in the RH...

Seondly, if suppose Ragini had not married Anmol and Anmol was just taking care of the family, its not long that the society would have disreputed Ragini using Anmol's name. The same goes, if Anmol was nowhere, and Alekh was normal and unmarried and Ragini also...then you an understand what I mean...

Ragini has not been shown so indpendent as to handle the business family etc...I would have been surprised if Ragini was shown such. Its good to see that she has matured, but she as a business tycoon would have been much to digest.

Anmol's essence was to get a "man" for the family to take care of a grieving Ragini, for Vasu-Indu who almost had lost two sons and more to get a father for Tamanna...Anmol's essence is much more than what is shown, if we think neutrally. Not all people can take regulat insults and live with the hope that his married partner will treat their marriage in the proper way. There are many things to note in the character Anmol. I am very glad that the creatives sketched this character of Anmol, after Sadhna died...

No self respecting son would back out when his family needs him most.Karan would have come back and taken all rsponsibilities like I said earlier if only remembered by cts.This is the biggest blooper by cts and no way justifiable. There are lot of women whose husband have passed away and they have lived their life with dignity and honor in this sociaty and I am proud to say my grandma is one of them, I am sure Ragini would have done it with same elan and with dignity too.

many people forgive what others have done..

Originally posted by: tamushi

No self respecting son would back out when his family needs him most.Karan would have come back and taken all rsponsibilities like I said earlier if only remembered by cts.This is the biggest blooper by cts and no way justifiable. There are lot of women whose husband have passed away and they have lived their life with dignity and honor in this sociaty and I am proud to say my grandma is one of them, I am sure Ragini would have done it with same elan and with dignity too.

have you seen the movie "Babul"...this stuff has been well shown there...why Rani Mukherjee's re marriage was shown....also, Sarika (amitabh's sis-in-law) led the life of a widow and at the end what dialogues she uttered...

I am not disagreeing that Karan could have come back, but Karan would have done that as a duty. But Anmol's service is totally selfless, though its also in a way to deal with that Ranveer saved his life..

Originally posted by: Omshanti1111

many people forgive what others have done..

1. .look at Sakshi, Mmaji did her kanyadaan and Kaushi did her bidaai and look at the lady...how she manipulated them? Its Vasu who manipulated, but Kaushi all along treated her as a daughter.

2. Look at Vasu: How she treated Sadhna before, Sadhna saved her life and how easily she gave Khushi to someone like Sakshi,

3. Look at Malti.

4. Look at Kaushi: what not Sadhna did for her, and she cannot see Tammy and Khushi in an unbiased manner.

5. Look at Tarun, Ajay

There are many people in this world who are ungrateful..thats where the term "aisaan faar amosh" comes,,,

That Anmol did not forget the favour of Ranveer, is the most solid example of his true character...

Yeah. I agree here :)

But hey, once Sadhna saved Vasu's life, Vasu became good towards her. So practically speaking, Anmol should save Vasu's life to win her trust.

Ok..Now I am thinking about who could cause harm to Vasu? Itni himmat kiske paas hain? 🤣

Originally posted by: shanti05

Bani Me and Sammy analyszed it too the one in bold

Seondly, if suppose Ragini had not married Anmol and Anmol was just taking care of the family, its not long that the society would have disreputed Ragini using Anmol's name. The same goes, if Anmol was nowhere, and Alekh was normal and unmarried and Ragini also...then you an understand what I mean...\

Ragini has not been shown so indpendent as to handle the business family etc...I would have been surprised if Ragini was shown such. Its good to see that she has matured, but she as a business tycoon would have been much to digest.

If Anmol was just like a care taker then society wud have made Ragini a kalankini and told that she was meeting up with this person and taking his help what relationship do they have and all

Then there wud have been more accusations on her

So this was the only way I think the creatives cud have done
and made Ragini stronger. otherwise to handle Alkeh and the kids it wud have been impossible

u r absolutely right...I wrote about the "kalankini" part in another post "how would Biaai end"...

Originally posted by: Ashrozia

Yeah. I agree here :)

But hey, once Sadhna saved Vasu's life, Vasu became good towards her. So practically speaking, Anmol should save Vasu's life to win her trust.

Ok..Now I am thinking about who could cause harm to Vasu? Itni himmat kiske paas hain? 🤣

May be Sakshi should throw Vasu into the fire...😆

And should fall in it too. Then Anmol can save both of them, thus winning Vasu's trust. And hopefully, this would change Sakshi too..HOPEFULLY, lolzzz. 🤣