Right to die with dignity - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

73

Views

7.9k

Users

11

Likes

30

Frequent Posters

return_to_hades thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 14 years ago
#21

Originally posted by: Mister.K.

the lack of dignity is not in dying painfully or in living painfully. the lack of dignity is in not knowing why the heck we are here in the first place and what the heck we are supposed to do once we are here. there's no dignity in ignorance, living like lab rats as we are.



There is not one human on earth who is not 'ignorant'. No matter what we try we will always be 'ignorant'. In the end its not about who knows what, but who is aware that they are 'ignorant'.

There is no surer sign of ignorance than the confidence of knowing it all, or more than others.
413342 thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#22

Originally posted by: return_to_hades



There is not one human on earth who is not 'ignorant'. No matter what we try we will always be 'ignorant'. In the end its not about who knows what, but who is aware that they are 'ignorant'.

There is no surer sign of ignorance than the confidence of knowing it all, or more than others.



I see what you are saying but the ignorance I was talking about is of a different nature. The ignorance I was talking about has pathos.

Living as we are, not having access to a "how-to-live" manual, not knowing the purpose of going through the motions but doing so anyway, mechanically, because we are supposed to...that is the kind of ignorance I was talking about. To me, that doesn't have any dignity what-so-ever. If someone's videotaping us, we would look down right silly (and undignified).

Now, is it our fault? Absolutely not!



Summer3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#23
So basically, if I understand correctly from Mr. K, most of us are just loitering and taking up space ( Not knowing the purpose of our existence or not attempting to unravel the mystery is to be classified as an undignified and pathetic life ).
If such is the case then it will not matter if we lived or died as it would be the coming and going of another insignificant character.😆
But I guess in life if we have loved then we have not lived in vain.
The scriptures advise those worldy persons who cannot give up attachment to live a proper life along the lines laid down and aspire to live a hundred years.
Isa Upanishad
444789 thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#24
Mr. K ka diet secret kya hai ji 🤔 😆 😆 😆 . Aise kya khake aata hai aur itna acha posts likhtha hai .. hai ji ?
413342 thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#25

Originally posted by: Summer3

So basically, if I understand correctly from Mr. K, most of us are just loitering and taking up space ( Not knowing the purpose of our existence or not attempting to unravel the mystery is to be classified as an undignified and pathetic life ).

If such is the case then it will not matter if we lived or died as it would be the coming and going of another insignificant character.



Mostly right Summer, but not quite what I wanted to convey.

Your topic is about the right to die with dignity. I know what you mean there; you were probably taking about mercy killing.

I was asking - why talk about dignity at death when, even during our entire lifetime, we never had it.

Dignity is defined as a state of being worthy of esteem or respect. And lack of dignity at death implies that the person who is about to die is so helpless that, in his/her own eyes, they would feel unworthy of esteem or respect when they are on life support.

My point is, when during our lifetime, were we not helpless? When during our lifetime, were we not on support? When during our lifetime, were we not fragile?

Edited by Mister.K. - 14 years ago
Summer3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#26

Originally posted by: Mister.K.

Mostly right Summer, but not quite what I wanted to convey.

Your topic is about the right to die with dignity. I know what you mean there; you were probably taking about mercy killing.

I was asking - why talk about dignity at death when, even during our entire lifetime, we never had it.

Dignity is defined as a state of being worthy of esteem or respect. And lack of dignity at death implies that the person who is about to die is so helpless that, in his/her own eyes, they would feel unworthy of esteem or respect when they are on life support.

My point is, when during our lifetime, were we not helpless? When during our lifetime, were we not on support? When during our lifetime, were we not fragile?

Okay got your point. Normally most everyday average persons ( no matter how bad a shape they are in) will always try to put up a "false" front and save some pride; especially in cases that pertain to health and economic well being. Basically putting up appearances as they say.
So Mr K , a life that is not lived in compliance with proper ethical conduct is considered to be undignified I guess.
Deeper spiritual stuff being ignored in this case.
Summer3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#27

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

Ah the complicated issue of Euthanasia.

Its a complicated issue, but I believe in the right to die with dignity. It definitely is not an easy choice. I've seen loved ones suffer excruciatingly in the final stages - who would have wanted to pull the plug but could not. Not that I want to let go, but I personally feel it is humane and compassionate to let people make that choice and save themselves some of the suffering as well as embarrassment of vegetated living. I would want that for myself. But I do know some people who want to fight till the very last breath no matter what. So its a choice people can have in their living wills.

Of course there are no clear cut answers, some people will give up to easily and some people will hang on too stubbornly (I know pro-lifers don't think there is any such thing as hanging on too long or too stubbornly). However, that is why I feel the legal framework should make room to allow some forms of Euthanasia for terminally ill or vegetated humans.

Alright the contention of wanting to die over pimple, wrinkle is ludicrous. If there is anyone out there who wants to, then they totally deserve to be eliminated for good riddance sake. Same goes for all those cry me a river jilted lovers and lonely hearts. If you can't grow some and live on for the few who do matter, then sorry you aint worth the burden on the biosphere.

Rape or abuse victims is a tricky situation. Actually even war veterans or people who witnessed murder, traumatic accidents suffer suicidal tendencies. Many clinically depressed (alright I know jilted lovers can also get to this point) people also suffer suicidal tendencies. One cannot look down on them. However, they dont need death with dignity, they deserve life with dignity. What they need is a support system that gives them strength and courage to live and move on. This is not a situation I would support euthanasia for.

I think euthanasia is fine.
Escapism is not acceptable, when a person just wants to call it quits and kick the bucket.
But I agree at time the personal tragedy or suffering is just too much for an individual to bear.
Japanese of old are well known for "harakiri", ending their lives to atone for mistakes made by killing themselves and cutting their belly (also called seppuku). Disgrace or defeat were the reasons for killing themselves.
_Angie_ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#28
More than anything else its a feeling of dependency and being a burden on others that make a terminally ill patient or a bedridden person opt for euthanasia. When a person feels loved and wanted s/he retains the spirit to fight all odds. But at times a person may feel that one has lived ones lifes purpose and theres nothing more useful that s/he can contribute and would like to pass away peacefully .Most ppl may not support euthanasia in cases where the person is not terminally ill or leading a vegetative life.
Should every person have the right to die when they want to or should it be reserved- if at all , only for those who seem to have reached a point of no return to any useful life - and who decides that- the person himself, his close relatives, the doctor, or the state ?
I think its best to let an individual decide that but while one is living why not just live fully so that when death knocks there are no regrets
and one is ready for it
I m reminded of the following lines ..I think it was Osho...
If you are alive there is inconvenience.

If you are alive there are challenges.

If you are alive then every moment you have to face reality, encounter reality.
...
Every moment you have to be ready to change and to move.

Reality has no security and that is its beauty.

Life has no security and that is its beauty.

Because there is no security, there is adventure.

Because the future is unknown,

nobody knows what is going to happen the next moment.

That's why there is challenge, growth, adventure.

If you miss adventure, you miss all.
Summer3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#29

Originally posted by: angie.4u

More than anything else its a feeling of dependency and being a burden on others that make a terminally ill patient or a bedridden person opt for euthanasia. When a person feels loved and wanted s/he retains the spirit to fight all odds. But at times a person may feel that one has lived ones lifes purpose and theres nothing more useful that s/he can contribute and would like to pass away peacefully .Most ppl may not support euthanasia in cases where the person is not terminally ill or leading a vegetative life.

Should every person have the right to die when they want to or should it be reserved- if at all , only for those who seem to have reached a point of no return to any useful life - and who decides that- the person himself, his close relatives, the doctor, or the state ?
I think its best to let an individual decide that but while one is living why not just live fully so that when death knocks there are no regrets
and one is ready for it
I m reminded of the following lines ..I think it was Osho...
If you are alive there is inconvenience.

If you are alive there are challenges.

If you are alive then every moment you have to face reality, encounter reality.
...
Every moment you have to be ready to change and to move.

Reality has no security and that is its beauty.

Life has no security and that is its beauty.

Because there is no security, there is adventure.

Because the future is unknown,

nobody knows what is going to happen the next moment.

That's why there is challenge, growth, adventure.

If you miss adventure, you miss all.

When things become really unbearable most tend to commit suicide.
But when one is too old and sick I think one should be given the option to just go off peacefully.
All young persons should not give up and take some counselling if necessary.
Often social or family pressures can drive many persons insane.
Some are born with great physical deformities or handicap and that too is another question and can be a social problem as not everyone has the mental strenght to carry on.
Edited by Summer3 - 14 years ago
Summer3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#30
Now this is shocking
A Father kills his son and then kill himself
He must have felt sorry for his son who is abnormal.

Sep 27, 2010

Father, son found dead

By Jermyn Chow and Mavis Toh

Double tragedy

TIMELINE leading up to the discovery of the deaths of father and son:

SATURDAY MORNING: Mr Shariffudin Abdul Kader, 56, leaves home with son Shah Amin Shariffudin, 19. AFTERNOON: He rents a Toyota Altis. 8PM: Father and son check into Copthorne Orchid Hotel in Dunearn Road.

SUNDAY, 3AM: Father leaves hotel.

5.20AM: Father's body found at Block 35, Marsiling Drive. Pronounced dead at 5.30am.
6.45AM: Police approach hotel staff and discover son's body with string around his neck. Teen was born with mental disabilities.
He was believed to have been strangled, and paramedics pronounced him dead at 7.30am - two hours after his father's body was found.
Mr Shariffudin, the nephew of Mr Rashid Hussain, founder of Malaysia's RHB Bank, is married to Madam Jasmin Abdullah, who is also known as Chong Guat Lean.
The couple also have an 18-year-old daughter.

The son's body being taken away. -- ST PHOTO: WONG KWAI CHOW

View more photos

BUSINESSMAN Shariffudin Abdul Kader spent the better part of Saturday with his favourite child, driving him around in a rented Toyota Altis before they checked into the Copthorne Orchid Hotel in Dunearn Road at 8pm that night.

Nine hours later, Mr Shariffudin was dead, his body lying at the foot of Block 35 in Marsiling Drive in the Woodlands area.

The 56-year-old had apparently jumped from the 12th storey of the 25-storey block.

Police converging at the scene found an electronic key card to his hotel room on the fourth floor, and a note which simply said that his son could be found at the hotel.

There, officers uncovered a grisly find: The lifeless body of Mr Shah Amin Shariffudin, 19, laid on the bed and covered with a blanket.

Police are not ruling out foul play although they are investigating the two cases as unnatural deaths.

Read the full story in Monday's edition of The Straits Times

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".