Will another 26/11 attack lead to Indo_Pak war?

Indradhanush thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#1
This paper suggests another 26/11 attack may lead to full scale Indo-Pak war.

I doubt this paper.

Most of these analysts don't have real idea of the ground situation in India & Pak.

With their own Af-Pak policy biting dust and Taliban on verge of winning again, I really doubt their credentials.



US fears another Mumbai type attack to ignite Indo-Pak war

Washington, July 22 (ANI): The United States has expressed fears of yet another Mumbai type attack on India aimed at igniting a war with Pakistan.

Talking to media persons on his special aircraft enroute to New Delhi, US Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen, while praising India for showing restraint after the ghastly 26/11 attacks, said that extremists may try to repeat the incident that left 166 dead and over 300 injured.

"I've worried a great deal about a repeat attack, of something like that," The Dawn quoted Mullen, as saying.

Mullen stressed that he alongwith the Obama administration is focussed on making sure "this doesn't happen again".

He pointed out that the Mumbai terror attack showed that how a handful of militants could have a "strategic impact" and bring two nuclear powered nations on the threshold of a full-scale military conflict.

"One of the things that struck me then and is still of great concern is that those terrorists could bring two countries closer (to possible conflict). It didn't bring them to the brink (of war) but it brought them closer," Mullen said.

Responding to a question over India's stand that Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) had provided support to the Mumbai attackers, Mullen said that after the incident he had conveyed his "grave concern" to that country, including the leadership of the ISI.

Mullen also acknowledged that the Obama administration has certain 'disagreements' with the ISI over its alleged links with militant organisations fighting against the US led allied forces in Afghanistan.

"The United States sometimes seeks "certain clarifications" from the ISI "on why certain things are done," the top US military official said.

Mullen is likely to visit Islamabad also following his two-day tour to India. (ANI)
Edited by Indradhanush - 15 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

15

Views

1k

Users

11

Likes

4

Frequent Posters

SolidSnake thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#2
Nothing earth shattering. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that any grave terror attack originating from Pak "may" lead to Indo-Pak war. Remember Op Parakram after Parliament attack.


Indradhanush thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: SolidSnake

Nothing earth shattering. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that any grave terror attack originating from Pak "may" lead to Indo-Pak war. Remember Op Parakram after Parliament attack.

Which lead to nothing, it was such a damp squib, such a large army operation resulting in nothing, India succumbed to pressure from US (surprise..!) and even changed Lt Gen officer (Viz) I think from strike corps. huh....


Nothing ever will happen. This assurance is what has kep terror camps alive.
Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 15 years ago
#4
Tension would be high and there is great possibility of a war.
India will blame Pak for shielding terrorists.
In the end civilians will suffer n die.
200467 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#5
I don't think Indian govt has the guts to declare a war on Pakistan. Too many complexities involved.
return_to_hades thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 15 years ago
#6
Btw which news source is this article from.

The date is July 22, of which year? Why is it being posted and discussed September 12th, 2010?

That being said, the Indian government overtly conservative and cautious when it comes to foreign policy and international politics. I doubt they would declare war unless Pakistan would officially declare war (which they to0 don't have the courage to openly do).

chal_phek_mat thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: return_to_hades

Btw which news source is this article from.

The date is July 22, of which year?

assumption it would be 2010 since that is somewhere around the timing when US Intelligence sounded those warning bells
Why is it being posted and discussed September 12th, 2010?
There were 2 suspected tourists(cant call them Terrorists since it would be un-PC, racial/regional biased targetting) went missing from the scanner of Indian intelligence in Mumbai while there was an outburst of voilence on the eve of Ramadan in Kashmir and the ongoing festivities of Ganeshustov in Mumbai😉



gopalbhai thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#8
Another similar attack would force India to undertake missions to destroy the known terror camps inside Pakistan. War may not even be declared.
Indradhanush thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: gopalbhai

Another similar attack would force India to undertake missions to destroy the known terror camps inside Pakistan. War may not even be declared.

Dear RTH. The article is garden fresh. Read the more palatable version
Now to the bigger part. If it would ever lead to war. Is impossible mostly because of nuclear deterrant on both sides.
After the terrorist attack on Parliament, the cabinet asked the forces to act against Pakistan. There was just one condition — action must be immediate and should not go beyond two weeks.

According to reports, the first Army plan was for several thrusts across the Line of Control, to be launched in early January. The second, after the Kaluchak massacre, was for a deep strike into Pakistan through the Rajasthan border. Both plans were infirm. India did not have the numbers and firepower to punch across the LoC, or sufficient special forces to undertake the task in an effective manner. The second plan's strategy of thrusting deep into Pakistan would have meant an all-out war with its attendant risk of the use of nuclear weapons.

Confronted by the cabinet mandate, the armed forces wanted a month's time frame, a window that was simply not available. Indeed, it has not been for a long time.
The 1965 Indo-Pak war lasted 22 days, and the 1971 conflict for 14. As the record now shows, on both occasions India came under enormous pressure from the UN and the great powers to stop fighting
Indradhanush thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#10

In the paper ; the possible nuke flash-Kashmir, there is descriptio n of scenario in which Pak will use Nuke s.


The most probable scene is Indian army forcing thorugh Rajasthan or Punjab border in full conventional power which would be difficult fo.r Pak to contain and they will resort to using small yield nuke on the frontal column of advancing indian army, this will have multiple effects.

Related Topics

Debate Mansion thumbnail

Posted by: Viswasruti · 2 months ago

Reflections on 2025: War, Terrorism, and a Fractured World Echoes of Pain and Courage: The World in 2025 As 2025 comes to an end, the world is...

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".