Poll
Will Tapasya take Raghu's offer of gambling partnership?
MITTALs CASE 30.12
Being Holmes S4: A Study in Treason (Sign Up Open)
Let's make if official
Love And War Budget Shoots up ,now eyeing Aug/Sep release
Hrithik Roshan is the most beautiful man to ever exist
📚Book Talk January Reading Challenge: Let us Ride On a Joyful Path📚
This actress was the original choice of Chalte Chalte opp Shah!
Kartik Aryan to start work on Bhool Bhulaiyaa 4 / Kabie Khan film!
🏏India Women vs Sri Lanka Women, 5th T20I 🏏
Salman fans are having fan wars in Mandarin with Chinese
💋Lets Sorts out Piano Hindi Songs
yeah u r rite sonali abt mathematic calculations in gambling by few or rather rare ppl do it!!đOriginally posted by: sonali_dg
Abhay , though I agree with a few folks here who are thumbs up for gambling, actually as they said, there are people who make mathematic calculations of probabilty and de-code the way poker machines or any other gambling machines work. They are highly brilliant people who learn to de-code that. I support such people who, atleast have it in them to do that, after all brilliancy has its rewards.
For,others who rely on luck are pure gamblers.As they show in movies, daaru ke adde pe baith ke gambling karo ya transparent kapde pehenkar karo baat ek hi hui fir toh!And for having said the above in an Indian forum I might actually get prisonned!đ For its a known fact that gambling in India is illegal!! I was surprised how they showed it on National TV. Fir se koi Rajya sabha mein issue uthayega like Balika Vadhu's đđ
yeah u r rite sonali abt mathematic calculations in gambling by few or rather rare ppl do it!!đ
but oderwise ppl who generally gamble don't go 4 calculations or theory of probability ( i knew this as in BSc. & MSc. we'd stats as subject esply we've 2 calculate S.D, Mean, Median etc.)but i wonder ppl call gambling as science & maths ( though i m not 2 oppose it bcoz 2 sum little extent it is 4 sum ppl) but so many weeks ago wen i posted abt pyschology & likes & dislikes by prsn reflects prsns mentality & behaviour & gave even names 2 support this "fact" then this was called as incomplete theory & no scientific basis as ppl'dn't read it !!!!!đ„±