About Ramadan - Page 12

Created

Last reply

Replies

115

Views

9.5k

Users

21

Likes

135

Frequent Posters

blue-ice. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: angie.4u

Hey what about our soldiers ? 😲 They are doing their duty ! 😕 So are the soldiers of the opponents !!!



I said innocent people.........terrorists are not soldiers........they do not kill people in the line of their duty.........they just kill innocents........
344471 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: blue-ice

No religion teaches to kill the innocent..........if someone is killing innocent people they don't belong to any religion.........that is my definition ......don't care for anyone Else's definition........



Seems like you missed my point. I wasn't commenting on what a religion teaches or preaches. It isn't about what the religion mandates its followers to do, but rather how loosely the followers interpret their religion and relates with it. The point is that we can violate or transgress an aspect of our religion but still belong to that said faith.

Religion is a huge spectrum. Things aren't always in black or white. There will be as many definitions of the word "Muslim" (or for that matter, the followers of any other religions) as many definers there are out there.

Think of it in this way - Indian law makes murder a criminal act. It is considered a brutal and heinous crime that is outlawed by the nation. Now what if an Indian citizen commits a murder - will that immediately make him a non-Indian for his violation of the law? Of course not. He will still remain an Indian - albeit an Indian who has disgraced his country by his unlawful deed - but an Indian nonetheless.

The fact is that Kasab considers himself a Muslim. A lot of his actions and thoughts came from his interpretation of Islam. This, however, sheds more light into his own nature than the religion that he claims to be inspired from. But that is another conversation best left for another day.
Edited by PhoeniXof_Hades - 15 years ago
_Angie_ thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: blue-ice



I said innocent people.........terrorists are not soldiers........they do not kill people in the line of their duty.........they just kill innocents........

I actually meant soldiers , the genuine soldiers employed in the armed forces. They sometimes kill innocents in the line of duty. Now who would qualify as innocent is again debatable .Most would consider the civilians as innocent. But what about soldiers who are risking their lives as part of their duty and no other ulterior motive . Are they also not innocent ? The whole idea of deliberately taking a human life other than in self defence appears to be so horribly wrong !!!

Talking of self defence, the soldiers could be said to be acting in self defence – for defending ones country against aggressors. I wonder whom the terrorists are defending themselves against ! ........... Against different ideologies perhaps ?! ..They could consider that as a threat to their way of life and go all out to defend that. It all boils down to ones perception.
Unless that person is capable of seeing other ppl's POV he is unlikely to realize that what he did was wrong, according to others.

Now don't get me wrong folks ! I m not defending any terrorist here 😆 In "my" perspective any deliberate killing is BAD ! We ought to leave the killings to the natural calamities which have lately increased in frequency and to the diseases out there. 😛 Rather than wasting our energies in killing each other it would be much better to use it to challenge the natural killers like floods, earthquakes, cyclones, tornados and the emerging diseases .

Anyway, we have drifted away from the topic and from what POH had said above.. Now to get back to it…
{ originally posted by POH
But what makes one a Muslim/Christian/Hindu etc then. Is there any clear-cut definitions of them. To even more conservative/religious people, we too aren't real "Muslims/Hindus/Christians" either.}
Wel, said POH 😛
I wonder who has the authority to decide about these definitions and thrust it down on others? Why cant a person be allowed to use ones own intellect to decide for himself. Those claiming to be knowledgeable about the scriptures , religion(any) should be ready to offer convincing explanation to someone who has doubts. Simply saying …it is so and so and you have to do so and so, becoz it is written by so and so .. is so outdated !
A ritual followed half heartedly without the spirit behind it serves no purpose.
blue-ice. thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 15 years ago
Will you consider an innocent killed by a soldier who is defending his country and an innocent killed by a suicide bomber the same.........the difference is in the intention...........the intention of a soldier is not to kill innocent civilians but sometimes they do get killed and its a collateral damage that every war has......
on the otherhand a terrorist plans to kill innocent people...what was 9/11....those terrorist were not on the battlefield....they knew very well that the only people killed will be innocent people.....what happened on 26/11, or on the local trains,in mosques and schools in Pakistan............who would blow up a school or a place of worship...

I fail to understand how one can even draw a parallel between the killings by a soldier VS. that by a terrorist....there is nothing to compare...

Regarding the religion....Was there any religion in the beginning...its nothing but man-made division.....Its not a science that I have to accept it the way it is...I am free to draw my own conclusion..so are you....we don't have to agree.... and for me terrorists do not belong to any religion....
return_to_hades thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: *Woh Ajnabee*



Absolutely. All those things are definitely permitted and not just that - I think they're required (or should be at least). I always get the question of how come chewing gum isn't allowed - well, chewing gum results in a calorie intake which defeats the purpose of fasting.



I always thought it was because chewing gum is usually for enjoyment - flavor, or just habit; because you do get zero calorie gum too. There are so many things with no calorie intake really. But they are more food and drink rather than hygiene necessity.
return_to_hades thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 15 years ago

Originally posted by: *Woh Ajnabee*



For example, my dad is a smoker (big sigh, I know) and since you can't smoke when you're fasting, he's does end up being mr. crankypants sometimes. I always get into an argument with him over that - I tell him to stop fasting if he can't deal with it and is going to be so angry all the time, but he refuses to do that as well. 😆 Awww, but he tries really hard to control his temper. Although now I know that my rage issues are so intense because I get it from both my parents, haha.



Here's what I don't get about fasting smokers. If you can not smoke for almost 14-16 hours - then why not more? Won't this be a great time to quit?

Smokers do get very cranky without their smokes though. Although there are people who get grumpy when they are hungry too. I used to, but I'm better now. My sister can be a beast though.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".