Originally posted by: qwertyesque
For the Jews its more like Close encounter of Hades kind.. poor rabbi..😆😆
SHUBHCHINTAK 20.2
INNER VOICES 21.2
GIRLS IN HOSTEL 19.2
How did bhumi go from being a good actor to expressionless?
Do Deewane Seher Mein - Official Reviews And Box Office
🏏ICC Men's T20 World Cup 2026 M40: AUS vs OMA at Pallekele🏏
Sbs segment : double dhamaka- spoiler!
Kriti Sanon Rashmika As Lesbian Couple In Cocktail 2
•• Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2 ~ Chat Club #2 ••
Any fans of Shilpa Rao here?
Mr. Shivprasad Deshmukh - Little Bit of Context and his Point of View
Originally posted by: qwertyesque
For the Jews its more like Close encounter of Hades kind.. poor rabbi..😆😆
Originally posted by: qwertyesque
the whole heartedly sounds more like a whole meal diet!!! I too agree... it doesnt cost to believe..
Answer the Five Questions:Why Science dont have an Answer about God!!!?Do we humans need evidance to believe!?why?Is there any experience that has or would convince you that there must be a being you might call God?Alternatively is there anything that would convince you that God could not possibly exist?Would that evidence convince everyone that no other scientifically viable conclusion is possible?Post your View and comments!😊
and whats that reality if not realization of God!!😊Originally posted by: mind-googling
If we attribute the origin of everything everywhere and the laws of nature to ONE thing and call that one thing God, then the fundamental and ultimate object of science is to find out God.
If we're talking about an intervening god, that listens to our prayers and wishes, judges us humanly and humanely, etc, the possibility of such a thing existing is really slim, unfortunately. If such a god exists, what accounts for the indiscriminate killing of lives by natural disasters?
'God' is all about supposition, in the end.
And, science involves everything that is a reality.
😊
Originally posted by: qwertyesque
and whats that reality if not realization of God!!😊
Originally posted by: mind-googling
If we attribute the origin of everything everywhere and the laws of nature to ONE thing and call that one thing God, then the fundamental and ultimate object of science is to find out God.
If we're talking about an intervening god, that listens to our prayers and wishes, judges us humanly and humanely, etc, the possibility of such a thing existing is really slim, unfortunately. If such a god exists, what accounts for the indiscriminate killing of lives by natural disasters?
'God' is all about supposition, in the end.
And, science involves everything that is a reality.
😊
Originally posted by: PhoeniXof_Hades
When we talk of God, we usually mean the latter. If we are talking about the former one, then God becomes synonymous with nature; why really call it God then?
Originally posted by: mind-googling
Everything that is real falls within the scope of science. Humans have not been able to uncover or discover much so far. Human ability and success so far to know through science should not be confused with science itself. Science is an approach.
^About real or reality..I think reality is beginningless and endless....bt our mind has a beginning and an end, hence the mind and reality cannot meet each other...I think mind is impotent, incapable of knwing the beginningless and the endless...& the mind exists between birth and death...Try to feel with heart then we can see the differnce ..