413107 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#1
Hey!
I saw this on Wiki.
Obviously whoever has written she is 22 must have got the information from somewhere and not just jotted down any first thing that came to their mind...Pooja being 22 is much more believable than 18...i wonder why poooja is trying to sound young, such a joke mate...
Anyways, she can hide the years if she wants, but she cant hide her matured face..ts up to her what age she wants to fake. Preety girl though.
Xoxo

Created

Last reply

Replies

8

Views

1.7k

Users

9

Likes

12

Frequent Posters

yakkudimag thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 15 years ago
#2
Haan..ek dhuan utha tha k woh 18 ki hai...yaar such a joke...maine kaha tha 18 ki woh 18 saal pahle rahi hogi..uske face par dikhta hai yaar..uska age..😆



366791 thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#3
Be careful trusting Wiki - people can edit it and so on But i agree she doesnt look 18
Edited by Aaliyah01 - 15 years ago
apothecary thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#4
yup, wikipedia is not a reliable source...anyone can write anything there...I can just go and write that she's 50 (don't attack me, I was just giving an example pooja fans)
curry-sistah thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#5

wikipedia isnt a reliable source, but i agree she still doesnt look 18. ....teens usually lie and say they are older.. not younger. lol . . but i think i read an article where she said she was 18.

DEEENCH thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#6
really wikipedia its the most fakest site ever..
never believe it.
Micron thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#7
Wikipedia is not a reliable source....anyone can edit Wikipedia information
luv4karan thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: the_Naked_face

Hey!

I saw this on Wiki.
Obviously whoever has written she is 22 must have got the information from somewhere and not just jotted down any first thing that came to their mind...Pooja being 22 is much more believable than 18...i wonder why poooja is trying to sound young, such a joke mate...
Anyways, she can hide the years if she wants, but she cant hide her matured face..ts up to her what age she wants to fake. Preety girl though.
Xoxo


i so agree with all of you ..wiki is not a reliable source.. inspite pooja sayiing that she's 18 - which could be a lie since she looks in her early 20s ... not 18 .. her face is mature looking and anyone can guess her age.. girls tend to lie about their age ... and espeically in acting profession where they want their fans to admire them .. no doubts, pooja is beautiful !!! xoxo😳
Ankita_Mathur thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: luv4karan


i so agree with all of you ..wiki is not a reliable source.. inspite pooja sayiing that she's 18 - which could be a lie since she looks in her early 20s ... not 18 .. her face is mature looking and anyone can guess her age.. girls tend to lie about their age ... and espeically in acting profession where they want their fans to admire them .. no doubts, pooja is beautiful !!! xoxo😳



But yaar in todays generation jahan ladkiyaan bolti hein we are intellectuals...usmei yeh jhoot..vain lagta hai yeh sab.May be she is the one, telling the truth...who knows....but I also agree that if she is 18....she looks mature than that....

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".