Masters keep saying then and again about how they love some as performers, how some are their favourites and so on. Yet those two who hardly got those praises for their own solos were the two best today, according to mass opinion. Yet again, some have been saying forever on this forum about how underrated Punit and Kunwar are! I was one of them for instance. So the question is, do the masters sometimes get amazed by some of the contestants, and end up becoming biased, while other, more deserving candidates get sidelined. Namely Kruti, Kunwar and Punit in my opinion. By the audience as well as by the masters. Do we need less candidates to be there so that we can see them getting good choreography and wonderful praise?
Just wanted to know your opinion. This is not entirely mine for sure. Just a thought that flashed through my mind. Since I don't think Terence ever underestimated Kunwar for example. He was always given chances of doing mind blowing choreography. 😃
P.S You'll excuse me but I can't call Kunwar... Amar. I just love Kunwar the name too much! 😳😆