Lali was 'bought' n brought to the Haveli for the purpose of giving a waaris to the family.... TRUE loha is Happy that Lali has concieved their waaris.... his son's son. AGREED
Now my question is whether the child is Ranjvijay's child or sekhar's chils,should it make any difference to loha or Lali..?? To Loha - probably not (although i suspect deep in Loha's heart he prefers it to be Shekhar's son as he has a greater respect for Shekhar than he has for Ranvijay).
To Lali - well if you discount the fact that Lali is a human being with a heart, then yes it makes no difference. But the fact is LALI IS A HUMAN BEING, she has a HEART. She LOVES Shekhar with all of her being. Even when she had the chance to run away, she returned when she heard that Shekhar may lose his life. YES IT MAKES A DIFFERENCE TO LALI!
Though Sekhar calls Lali his DharamPatni.... it's not true..... his Dharam patni is Siddeshwari and it is against Dharam thathe's sleeping with another woman in spite of having a wife..... TRUE - in the eyes of society and law Siddeshwari is his wife or DharamPatni (not knowing Hindi, i'm not sure of the nuances of the word). True also that it is against Dharam (assuming it means the same as the pali Dhamma) that he's sleeping with another woman. But what makes a DharamPatni - is it the one who you legally marry, be it in front of the sacrificial fire or the magistrates? or is DharamPatni the one who is faithful and self-sacrificial for the sake of her DharamPathi (not sure whether word is correct for husband), who goes over and beyond the call of duty to take care of her DharamPathi.
Siddheshwari may be a Dharampatni in the yes of of society but in reality is she one? THAT is the question! Wasn't it Siddeshwari who had no thought of being a companion to Shekhar, preferring the companionship of her mirror and ornaments? Wasn't it Siddheshwari who refused to go with Shekhar to start a life of their own? Wasn't it Siddheswari who tried to make her husband lose the race without any thought that it may endanger his life? Is that the meaning of a Dharampatni? She may be Shekhar's wife but she is no Dharampatni!!
So it Lali can be with Sekhar,Why not ranvijay instead of Sekhar?? Again, Lali's rights as a human being as been discounted! Lali was not a party to her being bought as a dasi. Lali had gone to the haveli with the idea that she was being reunited with her husband. In her eagerness and excitement of her union, she mistook Shekhar to be her husband. Lali fell in love with her husband only to be rudely awakened to the fact that he was not the Ganeshiya of her thoughts. But Lali DID FALL IN LOVE WITH SHEKHAR, we cannot overlook this fact and to say that it does not matter whether it is Ranvijay or Shekhar means that to you Lali is a paid commoditee and hence has no rights to feelings. But please remember Lali is not a thing, she is a person like you, like me. Please put yourself in Lali's shoes and then tell me it does not make a difference.
If Ranvijay is married,So is sekhar?? and anyways,Lali's with sekhar at the cost of siddeswari's honour! I agree that there is a dilemma. Because as much as Lali has feelings, so does Siddeshwari. But i suspect Siddeshwari's feelings are far shallower and less nobler than Lali's . I also feel for Siddeshwari but am not sure whether her sadness is really to the loss of her husband, Shekhar or that the loss of her husband means loss of her material comforts. If truly she feels the loss of her husband then i do feel sorry for her because of her shallowness, she lost the interest and love ofher husband. I don't think Shekhar really loved Siddeshwari in the sense of a sacrificial love - to him she was a sweet thing, a sweet companion - all very shallow because Shekhar too lived a very shallow life prior to Lali's appearance. But unlike Siddeshwari, Shekhar was a deep character and that depth was shown when Lali appeared.
Now for Lali it is her JOB to give a Waaris to the thakur family with a thakur's Son. none of ranvijay or Sekhar are her Husbands..... she loved Ganesia ,her real husband. Anyways she knows it's just her Job to give a waaris to the family..... she should be the mother as per Loha's condition.... So Why does it matter whose Son the child will be as long as it is one of Loha Singh's son's Waaris??😲
What say?????????????????? Please read above on my say!!
Cricket
