anjalibc thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#1
one eliminated contestant be brought in. If Mithunda said Retired injured , like in cricket but they get someone else to play , isn't it. Then why not bring back Vrushali or Bhavna. They both were really good.

Created

Last reply

Replies

14

Views

1.8k

Users

9

Frequent Posters

hindu4lyf thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#2
I've been tryna figure that out myself actually. It doesn't make sense at all cos i'm sure it's scheduled to finish on a certain date so how can they just take 2 out? Wouldn't that screw up the scheduled timetable?
and I doubt they're gonna bring back another wild card :(
rangeela_bakait thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: anjalibc

one eliminated contestant be brought in. If Mithunda said Retired injured , like in cricket but they get someone else to play , isn't it. Then why not bring back Vrushali or Bhavna. They both were really good.

or tanvi. she was another cutie. in time she might even learn to dance.😆
RainshineDiva thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#4
It's only fair to bring back Paulson - because he was also a retired injured person in a sense.

The others are out because of the janta's votes, as much as it is sad to see good talent go, that's the reality.

Whatever action the channel takes, they have to be very fair in how they tackle this matter... cos it's affecting someone's life.
anjalibc thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: RainshineDiva

It's only fair to bring back Paulson - because he was also a retired injured person in a sense.

The others are out because of the janta's votes, as much as it is sad to see good talent go, that's the reality.

Whatever action the channel takes, they have to be very fair in how they tackle this matter... cos it's affecting someone's life.

Right. But Paulson was also like Mangesh unfit. So no question of him returning , unless the doctors declares him fit . So good you pointed out actually they should bring back two person from the eliminated ones as the voting is not always genuine . So give them another chance to woo the public . It should be decided by the public only from atleast 4 eliminated ones with a dance competition. Not like last time Mithunda choose Sunita with a fear or threatening from Assam may be.
Anyway, can anyone please take up the matter with Zee as the show is really doing fine and should not end soon with two unfit contestants being out.
Edited by anjalibc - 16 years ago
chutneyx4404 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#6
Bhavna and Vrushali are good dancers, agreed. But if janta didn't vote for them then, they aren't going to vote for them again. I mean, they wouldn't win even if they came back. Same goes for Paulson, because he did come back for Wildcard round, but people didn't vote for him. So if they try to bring him back again, he's still not going to get votes. Honestly, I think wildcard is ineffective when it comes to public voting.
hindu4lyf thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 16 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: chutneyx4404

Bhavna and Vrushali are good dancers, agreed. But if janta didn't vote for them then, they aren't going to vote for them again. I mean, they wouldn't win even if they came back. Same goes for Paulson, because he did come back for Wildcard round, but people didn't vote for him. So if they try to bring him back again, he's still not going to get votes. Honestly, I think wildcard is ineffective when it comes to public voting.

I used to think the same till wild card contestant prachi desai came back and won JDJ2
RainshineDiva thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#8
There's a limit to how many times the same contestants should come and go from the show. Beyond which the process of elimination loses all meaning.
Tamedtempest thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: RainshineDiva

There's a limit to how many times the same contestants should come and go from the show. Beyond which the process of elimination loses all meaning.

very true and besides in the end only one will win....so why create this mess??
anjalibc thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: chutneyx4404

Bhavna and Vrushali are good dancers, agreed. But if janta didn't vote for them then, they aren't going to vote for them again. I mean, they wouldn't win even if they came back. Same goes for Paulson, because he did come back for Wildcard round, but people didn't vote for him. So if they try to bring him back again, he's still not going to get votes. Honestly, I think wildcard is ineffective when it comes to public voting.

No it is not like that. Bhavna and Vrushali did not go out bec Janata did not like them . It is bec too many choices were there and on that particular day some one else danced better. Now it would be only between 4 dancers and so possiblity of getting and entry.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".