But something irks me here... The fact that we cannot say anything against "fan favorites" but can happily bash "evil" people like Palak...
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 2nd Oct 2025
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 3rd Oct 2025
HEY JINDAGI 2.10
BAAT KARO NA 3.10
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Oct 3, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Bingo Blitz - The Ultimate Showdown (Sign-up)
Gen 5 News article Mila
🏏India vs West Indies,1st Test: N M Stadium, Ahmedabad, Day 2🏏
Sunny Sanskari Ki Tulsi Kumari opens well!!
How saiyara became hit
Is 2025 Jahnvi Kapoor's make or break year?
Karan's one sided love for Tulsi
Janhvi -Tiger in Lag Jaa Gale
You have been here for 5 years yet you cannot engage yourself in a decent arguement. Calling my posts immature, Unbalanced and biased doesnt make you the "winner" of this thread.
Let me tell how all this started. I wanted to write a detail opinion on Nauman not being Gutsy and also compared him to Sufi because these two fan favorites and the most popular Roadies rumoured to win the show. I bashed Nauman for not taking part in wrestler's task, not being much "daring" and for giving stupid/fake reasons/excuses. Then I compared Sufi to him and called Sufi a better Roadie.Now what do you do? You claim that you have been reading my posts and that I try to shut up people and stop them from making opinions. Then you defended Nauman as you are his fan and you have all right. But then you also "bashed" sufi in the process. Now here is the difference, I criticized Nauman and you bashed Sufi.Then I reacted to your "statements" and defended myself and Sufi. I also gave a more detailed version of my opinion about Nauman clearly mentioning that I like the guy but I disliked his friendship with Tamanna which I felt was fake and voteout benefit.Suddenly, you take it too personally and start bashing Sufi more and even me.Then I defend myself, in return, again explaining my opinions.Then you call my opinions unbalanced and that everybody on the forum agrees that I write unbalanced posts.Then I ask for proof for that and also in the meantime explained what I feel about debating and discussion.Then you try to end the debate by calling me "immature", "biased" and "unbalanced".Just because I am acting a little "cocky" doesnt make me immature and just because you are posting a polite insulting post doesnt make you a "saint".The main thing is that if you didnt like my thoughts on Nauman, you could have defended him and then you could have left. But no, you tried bashing me and that is when I took it personal. And then on top of that, you are calling me an unbalanced and immature person and claim everyone agrees to that is a direct insult. You have been crying all over that "Dont bash Nauman, it hurts my feelings" and you are directly bashing Me.. where did all those feel talk go? BDW, I am not an emotional person and I dont really feel hurt easily especially if someone criticises me on Internet. I am pretty smart to know that.
Originally posted by: aditisilawat
ok now dear Ihab and t2004sachin you both have to stop your discussions (which indeed is no more counted into discussion category specifically and is or already on the peek of turning into hot talk.) right here. you can sort out matter though pm.
Comparisons are strictly not allowed nor is bashing done in anykind. the post was considered first because Ihab you had kept your views and thats it, we all were here to just take or be a part in the discussion about what you think and what we do. but now since the topic is reaching out of no where please do not post anything here now. If there are more problems then please contact any of the DT member or me.
love,
aditi