Posted:
Someone wrote in one of the threads that Nauman did a very good thing by selecting Palak as his competitor and that he finally proved that he was "Gutsy". IMO, Nauman is everything but daring. Here are few of the things to show how "Gutsy" is Nauman :-
1.) He backed out as soon as he saw those two wrestlers.
2.) When he was asked whom he wants to challenge in order to make a wildcard entry, he choose Kiri when there was Samrat, Sandeep and Pradeep. He gave some nonsense as excuse for picking Kiri and Rannvijay mocked him telling that he picked Kiri only because he was weak and that he didnt want competition.
3.) When he was asked in last episode why he picked Palak, he gave some sh#t reason and again Rannvijay chopped him by letting out the whole truth about how Nauman thought Paulomi might get the chance to decide who is the winner.
Nauman is a cool and casual guy. He is also a big flirt in real life. Now that doesnt really make him a bad guy. But he is far from daring and gutsy and he lacks the spirit which Sufi and Samrat has. And everyone's favorite Rannvijay himself doesnt like Nauman and he openly shows it on the show. Always notice how Rannvijay mocks Nauman after every decision Nauman takes. Thats because it a well known fact that Nauman plays very safe and is not at all a very "gutsy" person. Now if there was one person whowas gutsy, it was Sufi. He went to the wrestler's task and performed in it. He was reasy to take part in the rugby task inspite of fractured leg but was advised not to. He was given an option between Karisma and immunity and he chose Karizma when he had chances of getting voted out that show. That is now daring. Even Samrat was daring.
I like Nauman and I really hate Palak and Paulomi for calling him "Soft "girl" who cant do Manly work". He can perform well but he is no match to Samrat and Sufi. The last three tasks, he has performed really well and when he won the task of walking between two Hot Balloons, Rannvijay mocked him by telling him not to feel that happy beating "girls" and asked him whether he could beat Sufi and Samrat in the last tasks.
The bottomline is that Sufi > Nauman and even the Man of this Forum, Mr. Rannvijay, finds it. Look at Rannvijay when he praises Sufi and look at him mocking Nauman. It is clear evident.
