maharaj anangpal's mistake??!!!

Frnz i waz thnkn dat Maharaj Anangpal(Prithvi's grandfather) is d base of all d mishap...see na,if he wouldn't hav asked someshwar about making prithvi king of delhi when jc alz arrived there for someshwar's birthday,history might b different.. I think then jc would hav been king of delhi,he wouldn't have any problem about prc and sanyo's love(bcoz he used to adore prithvi very much ...as we all know he called him 'mere sher' nd congratulated him 4 his success on koteshwar yatra..) Then as sanyo was his 1nly heir,automatically prc would hav been king of delhi..and whatever time,weapon,money,soldiers and most of all FRIENDS prc lost bcz of his animosity would hav been saved!! plus JC would hav helped prc against ghori....

yes dear par may be its his mistake may be the condition's mistake😳😳

u c dear tis has been discussed before numerous times n wat ur sayg is absolutely rite...infact many of us feel the same...if jc wud hve been the king...major problms wudnt have occured bt in reality its completely diff...mistakes did happen n wat we term as mistakes mayb it wasnt.....i hope i mke sense!

Originally posted by: mehraan

u c dear tis has been discussed before numerous times n wat ur sayg is absolutely rite...infact many of us feel the same...if jc wud hve been the king...major problms wudnt have occured bt in reality its completely diff...mistakes did happen n wat we term as mistakes mayb it wasnt.....i hope i mke sense!

yes right di😳

Originally posted by: mehraan

u c dear tis has been discussed before numerous times n wat ur sayg is absolutely rite...infact many of us feel the same...if jc wud hve been the king...major problms wudnt have occured bt in reality its completely diff...mistakes did happen n wat we term as mistakes mayb it wasnt.....i hope i mke sense!

i'm a new member here..so i dint kno wedr dis is prevsly discsd r nt😊 2ndly.ev1 i made it clear dat HISTORY is HISTORY,nd watevr diffcltz prc faced wer essence f prc...PRITHVI is PRITHVI coz f dat r he wud hav been someone else! But a thot came 2 my mind nd i put forth it...😊u c many a tims v can't c both sides f coin....😊 so wntd 2 c ur viewz oer it😊

Originally posted by: maria_awan

hi u r absolutely right i agree with u if anagpal didnot give delhi throne to prithvi history would be different today and prc and sanyogita had a great life but there is also jc mistake he should have understand that prithvi doesnot take it with this with his wish but he is a stupid number one😡

Originally posted by: manatated

Frnz i waz thnkn dat Maharaj Anangpal(Prithvi's grandfather) is d base of all d mishap...see na,if he wouldn't hav asked someshwar about making prithvi king of delhi when jc alz arrived there for someshwar's birthday,history might b different.. I think then jc would hav been king of delhi,he wouldn't have any problem about prc and sanyo's love(bcoz he used to adore prithvi very much ...as we all know he called him 'mere sher' nd congratulated him 4 his success on koteshwar yatra..) Then as sanyo was his 1nly heir,automatically prc would hav been king of delhi..and whatever time,weapon,money,soldiers and most of all FRIENDS prc lost bcz of his animosity would hav been saved!! plus JC would hav helped prc against ghori....

This is what i feel...Afterall history is history...essence f prc lies in difficulties he faced...bt stil i felt lik sharng dis wid u...pz comment....wud realy lik 2 kno hw mny f u agree nd ofcourse hw mny disagree😊

yes manatated I agree Anadpal was the one who created this rivalary..Well I agree JC was not as good as PRC was for Delhi's throne..but If JC would have sat 3 families would have bonded easily & would have fought enemies like ghori together & PRC & Sanyo would have stayed happy & so would have PRC's friends lived a longer life!