One for gender equality

Page

Next Last

andysah

@andysah

Explorer

Posted: 17 years ago

I really love that DID show is doing so much for gender equality. Like 1 girl, 1 boy elimination. Also out of 6 wild cards, 3 exactly has to be boy and 3 girls.

I have a proposal. Why do we have such lopsided sex ratio among the judges? 1 woman for 3 men. I mean come on 25% ratio is not seen even in Saharan Africa.

Can we substitute 1 male judge and replace him with a female?

Also we saw Kamlesh perform. Why no Kamla? Everything exactly have to be equal in the universe.

Quote

Frequent Posters

ana2008

@ana2008

Explorer

Posted: 17 years ago

If we follow your proposal,the world will be a perfect place to live :D

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Dabulls23

@Dabulls23

Stunner

+ 2

Posted: 17 years ago

They have to find one Kamla with some handicap.....

SOmetime I prefer better judging than gender equality as long as they are knowledgable and fair.....and not drunk like Mithun 😳

Quote

Namrata_12

@Namrata_12

Dazzler

Posted: 17 years ago

i really dont mind them replacing one judge with a female i really think they should replace mithun da because he really doesnt know how to judge.

Quote

Tamedtempest

@Tamedtempest

Navigator

Posted: 17 years ago

nooooooo repalcing! they should get two female grandmasters!

Quote

andysah

@andysah

Explorer

Posted: 17 years ago

How about Madhuri and Sridevi as two female grandmasters, followed by guest appearance by the original dream girl Hema Malini? Dream on..

Mithunda will be wide awake in presence of these two beauties then...

Quote

@-JC-

Rocker

+ 3

Posted: 17 years ago

Why does it matter. The actual judging i feel is done by the choreographers. Mithun da is just a representation of "janta" ya rite.. more like the producers. Newho... i don't think its a great issue about the judges. Because they've been judging the contestants fairly be it girl or boy. And the girls and boys are given equal opportunity.. so i have not complaints about this show due to that. But now that voting has started.. we'll see how unbiased the janta is about gender.

Quote

andysah

@andysah

Explorer

Posted: 17 years ago

You have a completely different idea about gender biasedness. See my idea is excellence should be rewarded, does not matter if its from a boy or girl or RuPaul.

In this show the average standard of the boys is way better than the girls. But still they are being judged in an antiquated rule - every week 1 boy and 1 girl is eliminated. Now in WC also, 3 boys and 3 girls are selected + 1 boy since the selected crop is now 4 boys & 5 girls. You are saying this is equal opportunity but I believe this is biased behavior. Even if Junta is unbiased, if they still continue with the old rule, i.e. the least voted boy and girl gets eliminated, how does that help?

Mithunda does sometimes eliminate based on his own rule like he eliminated Sunita or Mangesh.

Quote

Tamedtempest

@Tamedtempest

Navigator

Posted: 17 years ago

Originally posted by: andysah
You have a completely different idea about gender biasedness. See my idea is excellence should be rewarded, does not matter if its from a boy or girl or RuPaul.
In this show the average standard of the boys is way better than the girls. But still they are being judged in an antiquated rule - every week 1 boy and 1 girl is eliminated. Now in WC also, 3 boys and 3 girls are selected + 1 boy since the selected crop is now 4 boys & 5 girls. You are saying this is equal opportunity but I believe this is biased behavior. Even if Junta is unbiased, if they still continue with the old rule, i.e. the least voted boy and girl gets eliminated, how does that help?

Mithunda does sometimes eliminate based on his own rule like he eliminated Sunita or Mangesh.

I think I agree with you (I'm a little unsure of your viewpoints😕😳)

You are right about how the standard set by the boys is higher than the girls (excluding mandakani, she is a very strong contestant even Terrence Sir said it in the march 21 limelight episode, he is so happy to have her in his team).

I think it should just be the two weakest contestants facing off, not two boys vs two girls.

What purpose does the boy/girl elimination serve? Maybe they were trying to give the girls a fair chance because the show was going to go to public voting...and unfortunately girls get eliminated first...At the same time it's not fair to the boys, they work really hard and the girls are shielded in this way.

anyway, good intentions were not executed well.

Quote

andysah

@andysah

Explorer

Posted: 17 years ago

#10

Initial post was sarcastic. Sorry that I confused you.

Also I really wanted to see Sridevi. Where is she nowadays?

Another reason could be that it is difficult to pair dance if there are no girls left. And Hindi music is mostly romantic songs, would not like to see two boys dancing with these songs.

But the masters can choreograph 2 boys with 1 girl as they did before. Also at the very extreme they can make the boys dance with professional dancers. They can also dance as a faceoff style, that would be interesting. Let them faceoff against each other and show us who can dance the best.

Now if they persist with this rule, it would be Rakhi vs Salman, if the current trend of weakest dancer continues.

Quote

1 2

One for gender equality

Related Topics

Explore Topics