Originally posted by: The_Best
Not a kzk2 fan, but Parth looked better with Erica or Rishita than he does any day with Bhavika. He and Bhavika look unnatural. It’s like makers are forcing their scenes just because they forced Rishita to get out from the show. So now suddenly they are giving so many close scenes between Parth and Bhavika to attract young viewers and force some chemistry between them. Since trps are closed, we don’t know if they are actually liked.
Erica was a horrible choice for prerna 2.0, but she did have some chemistry with Parth. Bhavika may be a better actress, but she doesn’t have that chemistry with Parth. She would’ve also not fit Prerna face wise. Shweta was perfect as Prerna. No one comes close, but if they wanted someone from new gen, they could’ve taken Aishwariya Khare. She is a good actress and would’ve been a way better choice for Prerna 2.0. Not sure about Parth if she would’ve had chemistry with him or not. If not, then they didn’t have to take him. Could’ve taken someone else who was good and also had chemistry with Aishwariya
omg thank you so much for the validation. i was surprised to see a lot of parth fans going gaga over him and bhavika’s pairing in Reddit and i was starting to wonder is it just me that dont connect to them fully because i really liked the previous pair or what?!
I dont watch the show for a while but I came across some pics and scenes like in the pics they at least have some chemlstry but in the actual episodes its so dull! It doesnt hit the same way for me the way it did for him and Rishita.
@bold this is exactly what I feel , it came across as unnatural to me, at least based on the theme of shkh. esp when his character is a religious mufti, who is openly romancing and getting cosy with his ex this just doesnt sit well with me.
i thought maybe their chemistry might have worked in kzk kinda show where romance is needed , but if even kzk fans dont see it then that kinda proves my point right about their unnatural chemistry.
454