THARLA TAR MAG! Thread 10 - Page 99

Originally posted by: Sanskruthi

So Arjun had akkal to do DNA test then why the accident?!?! Ani ata ky balpaniche saglech kapde mothe karnar ka hi? Ani Arjun la suddha karayla lavnar?

Originally posted by: Prateekshaa29

that could be a fun track 😅

Originally posted by: Sanskruthi

TTM was good show in the beginning. They had good story... Now they've become typical SP show.

Challa TTM je negative points bole mi atta positive points.

1. Arjun was unlike the typical male leads seen in many TV serials. Although he was an angry young man and initially did not want any woman, including Sayali, in his life, he always remained respectful towards her and never abused or humiliated her. Even before falling in love with Sayali, he understood his responsibilities and took good care of her. In many serials, male leads often mistreat the female lead until they fall in love, but Arjun never followed that pattern. I also liked that he never mixed personal relationships with professional matters or let emotions cloud his judgment while identifying people's intentions, unlike Raviraj, who was blinded by his affection for his daughter. Arjun was a perfectly flawed male lead—serious, short-tempered, yet never toxic.

2. The love story between Arjun and Sayali was refreshing because it was not a typical enemies-to-lovers story. Even when they were not in love, they respected each other as individuals and genuinely cared for each other's well-being. Their relationship was built on mutual respect and understanding rather than constant misunderstandings and unnecessary conflicts, which are common in many television romances.

3. The makers tried to show Sayali first getting respect because of her good deeds and Priya as Tanvi getting hatred because of her bad deeds before bringing in the point that Priya was the fake Tanvi. This approach was much better than the Tamil version, where Roja and Priya were constantly fighting to prove themselves as the real Anu.

4. The makers tried to show the existence of Sayali's Ashram family, unlike the original version.

5. The makers tried to show Sayali actively helping Arjun in the Madhu Bhau case instead of limiting her role to household responsibilities. This was a welcome change from the Tamil version, where Roja was often shown only cooking for that family.

6. The makers tried to show good character development in Raviraj and Purna Aaji. At least in the Marathi version, they tried to show their blind love for Tanvi gradually reducing. Unlike the other versions, where Tiger (Raviraj) and Annapurna continued blindly trusting Priya simply because they believed she was the real Anu, even when Roja repeatedly claimed to be the real Anu, they still believed Priya and treated Roja unfairly.

7. The makers tried to show Raviraj leaving to fight the legal case against Madhu Bhau and occasionally helping Arjun and Sayali, unlike in Roja.

Originally posted by: Aarohi_2005

Challa TTM je negative points bole mi atta positive points.

1. Arjun was unlike the typical male leads seen in many TV serials. Although he was an angry young man and initially did not want any woman, including Sayali, in his life, he always remained respectful towards her and never abused or humiliated her. Even before falling in love with Sayali, he understood his responsibilities and took good care of her. In many serials, male leads often mistreat the female lead until they fall in love, but Arjun never followed that pattern. I also liked that he never mixed personal relationships with professional matters or let emotions cloud his judgment while identifying people's intentions, unlike Raviraj, who was blinded by his affection for his daughter. Arjun was a perfectly flawed male lead—serious, short-tempered, yet never toxic.

2. The love story between Arjun and Sayali was refreshing because it was not a typical enemies-to-lovers story. Even when they were not in love, they respected each other as individuals and genuinely cared for each other's well-being. Their relationship was built on mutual respect and understanding rather than constant misunderstandings and unnecessary conflicts, which are common in many television romances.

3. The makers tried to show Sayali first getting respect because of her good deeds and Priya as Tanvi getting hatred because of her bad deeds before bringing in the point that Priya was the fake Tanvi. This approach was much better than the Tamil version, where Roja and Priya were constantly fighting to prove themselves as the real Anu.

4. The makers tried to show the existence of Sayali's Ashram family, unlike the original version.

5. The makers tried to show Sayali actively helping Arjun in the Madhu Bhau case instead of limiting her role to household responsibilities. This was a welcome change from the Tamil version, where Roja was often shown only cooking for that family.

6. The makers tried to show good character development in Raviraj and Purna Aaji. At least in the Marathi version, they tried to show their blind love for Tanvi gradually reducing. Unlike the other versions, where Tiger (Raviraj) and Annapurna continued blindly trusting Priya simply because they believed she was the real Anu, even when Roja repeatedly claimed to be the real Anu, they still believed Priya and treated Roja unfairly.

7. The makers tried to show Raviraj leaving to fight the legal case against Madhu Bhau and occasionally helping Arjun and Sayali, unlike in Roja.

Please konhi tarihi majhe positive aani negative points read kara aani wapass TTM banva with same cast.

I will send your points to Shilpa ji

Exactly, But the way scams are covered under the umbrella of religion....

And not only Temples, but mosques, church donations all are scams....

I Don't understand why people give donations if they have money and can help then why not do community service and help collectively to the one who need help....

All are thieves......

Irony is Shri RAM Married Sita ( daughter of janak who was found under the earth )

Think about it thousands of years ago... RAM, Janak thought of SITA as blessing... Consider her as avatar of Goddess...not orphan nor paap...

Our Scriptures teach us humanity.... But who wants to learn it...

Originally posted by: Aarohi_2005

Challa TTM je negative points bole mi atta positive points.

1. Arjun was unlike the typical male leads seen in many TV serials. Although he was an angry young man and initially did not want any woman, including Sayali, in his life, he always remained respectful towards her and never abused or humiliated her. Even before falling in love with Sayali, he understood his responsibilities and took good care of her. In many serials, male leads often mistreat the female lead until they fall in love, but Arjun never followed that pattern. I also liked that he never mixed personal relationships with professional matters or let emotions cloud his judgment while identifying people's intentions, unlike Raviraj, who was blinded by his affection for his daughter. Arjun was a perfectly flawed male lead—serious, short-tempered, yet never toxic.

2. The love story between Arjun and Sayali was refreshing because it was not a typical enemies-to-lovers story. Even when they were not in love, they respected each other as individuals and genuinely cared for each other's well-being. Their relationship was built on mutual respect and understanding rather than constant misunderstandings and unnecessary conflicts, which are common in many television romances.

3. The makers tried to show Sayali first getting respect because of her good deeds and Priya as Tanvi getting hatred because of her bad deeds before bringing in the point that Priya was the fake Tanvi. This approach was much better than the Tamil version, where Roja and Priya were constantly fighting to prove themselves as the real Anu.

4. The makers tried to show the existence of Sayali's Ashram family, unlike the original version.

5. The makers tried to show Sayali actively helping Arjun in the Madhu Bhau case instead of limiting her role to household responsibilities. This was a welcome change from the Tamil version, where Roja was often shown only cooking for that family.

6. The makers tried to show good character development in Raviraj and Purna Aaji. At least in the Marathi version, they tried to show their blind love for Tanvi gradually reducing. Unlike the other versions, where Tiger (Raviraj) and Annapurna continued blindly trusting Priya simply because they believed she was the real Anu, even when Roja repeatedly claimed to be the real Anu, they still believed Priya and treated Roja unfairly.

7. The makers tried to show Raviraj leaving to fight the legal case against Madhu Bhau and occasionally helping Arjun and Sayali, unlike in Roja.

💯 percent ✔️

❤️❤️❤️❤️ for praising my Sayali

Originally posted by: RN555

💯 percent ✔️

❤️❤️❤️❤️ for praising my Sayali

Mi TTM chya badal khup sare negative points, so vatla ki positive pan bolav. Because if I keep speaking negative points then it would be discouragement. TTM deserves criticism for negative points and appreciation for positive points.