SRK was a Serial Cheater before Committing to Gauri - Page 3

haan ...and salman bhai is innocent

https://x.com/iamsrk/status/669535232110931968

Originally posted by: Sorry_Bol

Instead of always attacking Members, passively that is, why don't you try staying on topic or ignoring it?

What do you mean the member needs attention? He came across a news article and posted it. Isn't that what the forum is for?

bold: Honestly, dear??? "always"???

bold: you certainly mean an alleged tabloid article without showing which tabloid it was and from when... could be a made-up one (or have you an information more precise?) - will discuss that in another post

bold: So, in your opinion this forum is there to make quite vile (and strongly negativly biased) clickbait title-statements like "SRK was a Serial Cheater before Committing to Gauri" and "Why has Deepika Padukone lost her charm on Audience?" That would make the forum rather unethical and not a forum that can achieve this ("appearing prominently on the first page of Google.):

That is my response to a quite strange reproach about my ironic interpretation why the two respective threads got these titles.

Now to my comment of this "news"... (extra post)

The alleged tabloid article:

"Shah Rukh's old lover has come to light" - how?, when?, by whom? - the reader won't get to know...

"... the reality is that in the past, he has been quite a player and a deceitful type of person." - slander which makes already clear what kind of mindset the author has (making SRK-haters happy ).

"news about Shah Rukh Khan has been heard" - when? by whom? in addition: "which forces us to believe" - who is "us"? and how is making a choice equal to 'forcing'???

"people say" - (wow, so precise)

"a girl named Divya Seth played a very big role in Shah Rukh's success today, whom Shah Rukh now even refuses to recognize" - first blatant lie (about a now 43-year-long friendship)

"Shah Rukh's romance with Divya started during the staging of the famous English play "Kiss Me, Kate" by Barry John in Delhi." - second and third lie (no romance, no Kiss me Kate play at the time where SRK was in Barry John's TAP)

"Reports from that period suggest..." and "A special source says" - oh yeah! great! and so on and so forth... with a suggestive text following... and even a random photo...

All this made the topic maker conclude:

Originally posted by: Bagarh.Billa

The relationship was serious, Shah Rukh reportedly promised to marry her. Her mother (a veteran actress) approved of the match and even helped secure Shah Rukh's breakthrough role in the film Deewana.

After Deewana became a massive hit, Shah Rukh left her to reunite with Gauri. She reportedly called him a "dhokebaaz" (cheater) and claimed he used her for success.

Six fat lies in those some lines:

1 - a female friend is not a "girlfriend" // 2 - no promise of marriage (except to Gauri) // 3 - there was no "match" to approve // 4 - Sushma Seth had no say in SRK getting casted in Deewana (but she was a motherly friend to him) // 5 - there was no leaving Divya and 'reuniting' with Gauri (Deewana released 26.6.1992 and the marriage with Gauri was in August 1991) // 6 - Divya never made such a claim

It is one thing to dislike SRK but it is a whole other thing to peddle so many lies... t h a t is "cheating"

she played shahid Kapoor mom in Jab we met

Originally posted by: Clochette

Someone seems to badly need attention... (first Deepika, now SRK... what lies will come next... )

Next is Ranveer Singh.