Originally posted by: sadiltl
Yaar i am talking about writers to place such scenes and inappropriate clothing. I dont want to prove anything about my ideas on feminism. I trust you know them.
I cant wear such dress to my work and expect that no one will stare at me! Nor approve any woman or man in my team to dress like that. If there is a couple working in my team, I will more than make sure the lady wont dress anything like that because her husband who has feelings for her is part of my team! :D There are boundaries and clothing defines boundaries. Also there is an entire industry that survives on lingerie and seduction. If there in no concept like seduction and clothing helping it, then why do women wear such special clothes for special ones?!
When writing is bad, presentation is bad, we have to call out. Not support the writers. IMO.
It is not about Mannat, not about ayesha. It is about writers placing the woman who is distressed, in wrong clothes in front of man who has feelings. The meaning changes. I never bothered much because the dressing has been like this in this show. But now it is interfering with the story. If DK is shown as a crook, why would i expect any decency from him. If a woman is shown to be not able to analyze the feelings of the man when he just confessed his feelings, then whats the use of her brain? That is how writers are making it look like. Writing and presentation is bad. I could not overlook it.
It is not clothes also, it is everything. Why is mannat staying in outhouse while romancing the dude openly. She wants to show they are a couple to Dua, then why is she not moving out of outhouse. Will you write like this? it is so so confusing.
If one has to talk about feminism and equality, let mannat have a profession and job! 
I am waiting for the day when you call out the writers for their absolute stupitdity instead of backing them up yaar! doesnt make sense when you defend them.
Me supporting the writing??? 😄😄😄
I told you how the dressing has been since the beginning not just for Mannat... but for Malla Aish Y and Vish. Since you have not watched pre leap.
I am questioning the fundamental flaw in your argument. Mannat is not dressed like this at her workplace. SM is Viks house, her future marital home, she is surrounded by friends and family. And it is her wedding. She is bride for God's sakes. She can dress whatever way she wants. Thats why I said happy dressing. When Mannat is looking forward to her future and she dresses boldly.
Are you trying to imply Mannat is seducing Vik and DK by such clothing??? Then sorry dont see it that way.
Like Mona said... cleavage is not an issue. Shouldn't be.
But if it is what excites men and entices them then both Vik and DK should be attracted to Malla and Y isnt it???
Malla has been living with Vik since the beginning of the show (from her childhood as per story). Y is his GF of 3 years. Yet he never got attracted to them. Both of them are far more skimpily dressed than Mannat all the time.
Mannat has been wearing same 5 suits (chest covered up) for 7 years yet DK is attracted to her and is in love with her.
For both men, they are in love with Mannat for her personality and not her dressing.
It makes them look shallow if her dressing is what will make them loose their sense of boundaries.
And I am glad you brought feminism into conversation ... because a true definition means a woman has autonomy over her decisions... whether to love someone or not, whether to name someone as father or not and what to wear!!!!
Just because you feel DK should get Dua doesnt mean you can criticize Mannat on such badic level. I havent watched the episode but from what I know, Mannat was not waiting for DK to help her get ready for the mehendi event or hoping to share her feelings with him... So no... nothing on her again!!!!
Why Mannat and gang lives in outhouse... I am asking that too... probably to make a big deal about Mannats grihapravesh as Viks official bride. 🤦♀️
Edited by Moor278 - 2 hours ago
1.4k