Dhurandhar 2 - The meltdown has begun - Page 23

Originally posted by: Cynical1

https://x.com/MeghUpdates/status/2035974239929700537

No, it isn't "truth"... Dhurandhar is fiction albeit using real events which is okay... however propagating the movie as "truth" isn't okay.

Both Dhurandhar movies had been done with cinematic and performance skills, no doubt, but the content just uses real events and persons that existed to tell a fictive story.

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

From where did this Hindu vs Muslim start?

Religion pe ladne ka koi fayda nahi hai, no religion is saving anyone, Iran is bombing middle east, Pakistan is bombing Afghanistan

bold: Should be like this but you see that religion gets used for a certain agenda (targeting now every Muslim element in Hindi movies)...religions not only get politicised, but also misused for other agendas.... look at the introductory post of this thread... the tweets are selected for a purpose, right?

Originally posted by: Cynical1

https://x.com/ImperialBharat/status/2035716810121920785

SRK, Aamir... Did someone send this member here for the purpose to incite for more dividing or is it done for the own 'enjoyment'?

Originally posted by: Clochette

bold: Should be like this but you see that religion gets used for a certain agenda (targeting now every Muslim element in Hindi movies)...religions not only get politicised, but also misused for other agendas.... look at the introductory post of this thread... the tweets are selected for a purpose, right?

OP is on targeting Hindu element in Hindi movie

Both sides are present there, why did you choose to see only one side of it?

https://x.com/samosemainaloo/status/2034269693352214657

Originally posted by: Cynical1

https://x.com/CursedsundariX/status/2035663318615253268

one movie and urduwoods ugly past gets exposed

Ask Google "which non-Muslim gangsters produced Hindi movies?" ... and you will get this:

Haji Mastan Mirza (Haji Mastan): Often described as the first "celebrity gangster" of Bombay, Mastan was a prominent smuggler who used his wealth to build relationships with Bollywood personalities. While he acted more as a financier and influencer, he is widely cited as the model for film production within the crime world during his era. His life inspired the 2010 film Once Upon a Time in Mumbaai.

Varadarajan Mudaliar: Active in the 1980s, Mudaliar was a powerful gang leader who controlled smuggling and extortions. He was known to have strong links within the Tamil and Hindi film industries, often influencing film production or providing financial support, and was portrayed in the film Nayakan.

Chhota Rajan (Rajendra Sadashiv Nikalje): Although primarily known for his violent rivalry with Dawood Ibrahim, Chhota Rajan and his associates—often categorized as the "Nana Company"—were involved in extorting Bollywood producers, particularly in the 1990s, forcing some to produce films on their behalf

Again one post and a quite ugly intention is exposed...

Originally posted by: snatch

which religion allows pedophilia ? (by its text/tenet/culture/custom)

Comparing a cultural use with pedophilia... wow!

Pedophilic disorder is characterized by recurring, intense sexually arousing fantasies, urges, or sexual behavior involving children (usually 13 years old or younger).

Child marriage (also in Christianity), while condemned today, historically persisted across religions due to cultural, economic, and patriarchal factors rather than theological mandates.

Islam: In Islamic tradition, the permissibility of child marriage is usually attributed to a combination of Quranic verses, the actions of the Prophet Muhammad (Sunna), and the historical context of the 7th century. While the Quran does not specify a fixed minimum age, classical legal scholars interpret certain verses as implicitly permitting it.

Hinduism: Child marriage in historical Hindu society was primarily driven by social, economic, and security concerns rather than core religious doctrine, often aimed at protecting family honor, property, and enforcing strict patriarchal control over women's purity. Practices such as forbidding widow remarriage (including for child widows) and encouraging early marriage were implemented to maintain social order and property, despite causing significant suffering, particularly before the Hindu Widow's Remarriage Act 1856. (Wiki)

The dividing continues following a very clear agenda...

.

Originally posted by: Cynical1

... yet another example of how Dhurundhar has brought up questions about how urduwood operated

Interesting how Hindi Cinema or Bollywood got changed into "urduwood", right? Of course, there is NO agenda behind it, right or wrong? Aks yourself...

The new narrative obliterates completely the 'urdu' parts that made Hindi Cinema a great Cinema... all those who know Hindi Cinema would know, what I mean...

I don't get this religion war. every religion has some shortcoming.

still I would say that satipratha, dowry and child marriage are not part of hindu religion. these are superstitions.

Originally posted by: Sultan.Mirza

Mujhe pata chal gaya hai ke Cynical kiska MID hai

Well, in the Iran war threads he posed as a complete Beginner even telling how he has to 'find his way' in the forum...

Originally posted by: iamrebelheart

I don't get this religion war. every religion has some shortcoming.

still I would say that satipratha, dowry and child marriage are not part of hindu religion. these are superstitions.

There is no such thing in the scriptures? Also, please read my post about that subject, it clearly brings reasons why - at a certain time - child marriages had been part of society (in many societies independent of their religious belief systems).