Global Alert: US–Israel's Major Military Operations on Iran🔥#2 - Page 27

Originally posted by: Cynical1

this is google AI result

Global Statistics (1979–2024)

• Total Islamist Attacks: Between 1979 and April 2024, at least 66,872 Islamist terrorist attacks were recorded worldwide.
• Recent Surge: More than 84% of these attacks (roughly 56,413) occurred in just the last 11 years (2013–2024), showing a significant intensification in recent history.
• Casualties: These attacks have resulted in at least 249,941 deaths globally

and you have a problem with anyone saying/having problems with Islamic terrorists / Islamic extremists ?

Shouldn’t you have a problem if one just said Muslims carried those many attacks and deaths and instead refer to them as Islamic terrorists / extremists so that they don’t drag the entire set of people ?

Yet you are the one that said mocking god is worst than terrorism so you probably won’t get the difference.

you can keep trying to silence me with baseless arguments and statements. My problem is Islamic extremism/terrorism which is real - just check those numbers above. And that does not include mass anhillation by them in Kashmir , Pakistan , Bangladesh , Syria, Iran and other places.

If you feel like this then it is fine as I can't change your opinions.

Why can't you share the positive things too?

The scientific inventions etc?

https://www.mymasjid.ca/10-muslim-inventions-shape-world/

Good find... here in shorter from AI:

"The term "Hinduism" was primarily coined and popularized by

British colonists and writers in the early 19th century to create a unified, identifiable religion out of the diverse, ancient traditions of India. While the word "Hindu" has older roots (Persian/Greek for people beyond the Indus River), "Hinduism" as a singular religious, legal, and political concept largely emerged during the British Raj to distinguish between the native Indian population and others.

• 19th Century Emergence: While early usages appeared in the late 18th century, it was during the 19th century that the term became common, with Raja Rammohun Roy often cited as the first Indian to use the term "Hinduism" in 1816.
• British Adoption: It was fully established in popular English usage around the 1870s, notably following the publication of a handbook on "Hinduism" by the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge in 1877.
• Alternative Viewpoint: Some scholars suggest the "invention" was a shared process, with Indian intellectuals and reformers in the 19th century also helping to define the term, although the primary usage was driven by colonial categorization.
• Earlier Usage: The term "Hindooism" appeared in a Bengali-English grammar book as early as 1829, and early 19th-century accounts often described a "Hindoo system".

The concept of a unified religion was adopted by Indians over time, often substituting for the traditional term Sanatana Dharma (Eternal Law)." (AI)

Originally posted by: Clochette

Correct... In what - do you think - Trump and Netanyahu believe? (not religion-wise, though).

Power and control!

And I have heard: Greater Isreal too

Originally posted by: Clochette

Correct... In what - do you think - Trump and Netanyahu believe? (not religion-wise, though).

Netanyahu i think does believe in the safety & well-being of its citizens but Trump has mostly self interests in mind. That's just my personal thinking and i may be wrong cos they are both politicians and I don't know them too well.

MP: Indian reformers engaged in a selective appropriation of Western ideas while rejecting other elements of the fare. One example is the term “Hinduism” itself. It was used first by Charles Grant in a pejorative sense, to dismiss “natives’” religion as crude superstition. Yet within a few years that same term was reclaimed by Rammohan Roy, who gave it a positive gloss—he “owns” the term.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/matter-of-tact/hinduism-missionaries-and-modernity-a-historians-perspective/

Originally posted by: xnbstar

If you feel like this then it is fine as I can't change your opinions.

Why can't you share the positive things too?

The scientific inventions etc?

One of my neighbors is a Muslim. I have known him since my childhood and he is an amazing person as well as his family.

That’s my positive experience shared ✅

We have also had father our our nuclear program and president of India who was a Muslim. Proof that India is where Muslims not just grow in numbers but also prosper and can reach the highest level of office.

Another positive statement ✅

Now can you please explain why Pakistan massacred minorities ?

Originally posted by: NathuPaapi

Netanyahu i think does believe in the safety & well-being of its citizens but Trump has mostly self interests in mind. That's just my personal thinking and i may be wrong cos they are both politicians and I don't know them too well.

Netahanyu does Gods own work when eliminating Islamic extremists daily and protecting his citizens (of all faiths) from the extremists. Unfortunately despite his best efforts events like Oct 7 happen which many “large peaceful majority” liked and supported (including NY mayors wife)

Originally posted by: Clochette

Good find... here in shorter from AI:

"The term "Hinduism" was primarily coined and popularized by

British colonists and writers in the early 19th century to create a unified, identifiable religion out of the diverse, ancient traditions of India. While the word "Hindu" has older roots (Persian/Greek for people beyond the Indus River), "Hinduism" as a singular religious, legal, and political concept largely emerged during the British Raj to distinguish between the native Indian population and others.

• 19th Century Emergence: While early usages appeared in the late 18th century, it was during the 19th century that the term became common, with Raja Rammohun Roy often cited as the first Indian to use the term "Hinduism" in 1816.
• 
  

So

The term "Hinduism" was primarily coined and popularized by

British colonists and writers in the early 19th century

early usages appeared in the late 18th century,

But

it was during the 19th century that the term became common, with Raja Rammohun Roy often cited as the first Indian to use the term "Hinduism" in 1816.

So Raja Ram Mohan Roy was the first Indian to use the word hinduism and make its use more common while the word Hinduism itself was coined by British colonists.

Originally posted by: Cynical1

One of my neighbors is a Muslim. I have known him since my childhood and he is an amazing person as well as his family.

That’s my positive experience shared ✅

We have also had father our our nuclear program and president of India who was a Muslim. Proof that India is where Muslims not just grow in numbers but also prosper and can reach the highest level of office.

Another positive statement ✅

Now can you please explain why Pakistan massacred minorities ?

Finally, something nice to hear from your end! ✨️

Regarding your second comment, why you don't see the other side of the coin? I know and understand your point that hurting others is inhumane and those are involved needs to be punished.

https://youtu.be/bi3VfXyI65g?si=wdfIYoSPcxOk0VQr

https://youtu.be/RKYxsT4T1tY?si=oEzvD3MDMaGkE1oE

https://youtu.be/G587BwrBbxQ?si=mvwFHGhCGuNlqPDt

https://youtu.be/r4_I5FqU7wM?si=OqreaF4Cryx6wtOl

https://youtu.be/7uAEbUqhkVI?si=OCSCfBRcEMxQir3N

https://youtu.be/u7xjQycX8qc?si=VJMVnxmXr3-jDkFd

........

Log achy se bhi to rehrahy hain na? If evilness exists, then surely goodness too?

See all are happy! Galat bhi jo hota hai wo bhi bahut ziada galat hai, so there should be a severe punishment to hurt innocent humans but we can't deny the fact the they're 'also' living happily too.

......

Please don’t use negative words now. I am tired with unnecessary hatred. Kabhi to pyaari aur achi baat karely hum log?

I've been to India twice since have multiple close relatives there and would love to visit again but it doesn't mean I am against the people. Because achy and buray log sab countries and families me hoty hain.

Please only positive comment next like this. Hope you're also not liking and encouraging this.

I reiterate that nobody here denies the negative impact on humanity through Islamic extremism/terrorism. But even showing numbers of the criminal/violent deeds done wouldn' change that it exists.

When taking words like "eliminate" or "get rid of", then why not tell in which way exactly? What does only ranting about it over & over again to change it?

And again, this war (the topic!!!!) is n o t really about that subject.