Chhaava Is A Divisive Film - A R Rehman - Page 10

Disgusting victim blaming and gaslighting going on. Ye achha hai, first hound, murder, rape , pillage , throw away , forcefully convert Hindus in all their countries where they're majorities and then blame and point finger at them.

Humanity truly hit rock bottom .

Wake me up when Pakistan or Bangladesh has a Hindu PM .

We all know how likely is that to happen .

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

Both Dhurandhar and Chhava are much more secular than Animal

Animal literally had Gaumutra drinking male lead doing "sar tan se juda" of a muslim villain who had multiple wives and he would sexually assault them

There was also a scene of Ranvijay mocking that Christian guy and Church

Originally posted by: Briaahna

dhurandhar and Chaava were trash in their way too actually they are more dangerous than animal

Dangerous for supporters of terrorists and tyrants, for sure but don't think normal people from any religion or location should have any issues with them

Originally posted by: MannMeinRadha

In any country , where Muslims are minority , they always say , " What about minority rights. "

In any country where Muslims are majority, they always say, " What minority rights ?? There's no such thing supported in our belief system. Minorities don't have right to exist , forget any other rights. "

Don't care about other countries, frankly 99% of countries have same issues, They can do whatever they want, I really don't care

Originally posted by: Briaahna

dhurandhar and Chaava were trash in their way too actually they are more dangerous than animal

grapes are sour.

Originally posted by: missFiesty_69

Exactly. People who have studied Indian history are well aware of how much of a cruel ruler Aurangzeb was. Heck, he jailed his own father. Many of the Mughals were oppressive. It has nothing to do with a certain "factor" and everything to do with their individual personalities. People refuse to accept this without indulging in a debate about the current political climate in India.

bold: That's my thinking, too - and how fortunate it would be if all people would think like this.

As for Rahman and his interview, I think like Beautiful in a post before: He did it for attention and maybe also out of a certain frustration, but he got rightfully criticised for certain remarks (imo).

Originally posted by: MannMeinRadha

In any country , where Muslims are minority , they always say , " What about minority rights. "

In any country where Muslims are majority, they always say, " What minority rights ?? There's no such thing supported in our belief system. Minorities don't have right to exist , forget any other rights. "

To me, there is a big diffrerence between your (generalizing) post and what MsWhiskerson wrote with her examples (which I found very apt to describe a certain situation).

The bold part is a remark that reeks of ignorance although even non-Muslim people (like me) can educate themselves about what the Quran (the initial belief-system) has to say:

"The Quran emphasizes universal human equality and dignity, stressing that piety, not race or origin, determines status, with verses promoting religious freedom, tolerance (like "to you your religion, and to me mine"), and protection for minorities, while also allowing for diverse paths to God and encouraging good deeds across faiths, though interpretations on specific societal roles vary . Key principles include "no compulsion in religion" (2:256) and mandates to protect places of worship, reflecting a core theme of co-existence and respect for other communities...." (AI-text)

It's the failure of politics and human flaws when t h i s isn't respected by Muslims. (like MissFiesty wrote: of individuals)... History of mankind also talks about Muslim leaders who respect this part of their "belief system"... and so also do a lot of common Muslims.