Dhurandhar reviews and box office - 590 crores India, 850 crore Global - Page 119

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

https://www.instagram.com/p/DSnSsulivBT/

Originally posted by: EkPaheli

Kaash

2 hafton se lage hue hai...They haven't spent a single penny on promotions...Sara load WOM matlab humpe daal diya....

Dhurandhar 20 Days All Language Box Office Collection

DayIndia Net CollectionChange(+/-)

Day 1 [1st Friday]₹ 28 Cr -
Day 2 [1st Saturday]₹ 32 Cr 14.29%
Day 3 [1st Sunday]₹ 43 Cr 34.38%
Day 4 [1st Monday]₹ 23.25 Cr -45.93%
Day 5 [1st Tuesday]₹ 27 Cr 16.13%
Day 6 [1st Wednesday]₹ 27 Cr 0.00%

Day 7 [1st Thursday]₹ 27 Cr 0.00%
Week 1 Collection₹ 207.25 Cr-
Day 8 [2nd Friday]₹ 32.5 Cr 20.37%
Day 9 [2nd Saturday]₹ 53 Cr 63.08%
Day 10 [2nd Sunday]₹ 58 Cr 9.43%
Day 11 [2nd Monday]₹ 30.5 Cr -47.41%

Day 12 [2nd Tuesday]₹ 30.5 Cr 0.00%
Day 13 [2nd Wednesday]₹ 25.5 Cr -16.39%
Day 14 [2nd Thursday]₹ 23.25 Cr -8.82%
Week 2 Collection₹ 253.25 Cr22.20%
Day 15 [3rd Friday]₹ 22.5 Cr -3.23%
Day 16 [3rd Saturday]₹ 34.25 Cr 52.22%

Day 17 [3rd Sunday]₹ 38.5 Cr 12.41%
Day 18 [3rd Monday]₹ 16.5 Cr -57.14%
Day 19 [3rd Tuesday]₹ 17.25 Cr * rough data4.55%
Day 20 [3rd Wednesday]₹ Cr * may earn-
Total₹ 589.5 Cr-

Originally posted by: Briaahna

Raavan gonna overshadow Ram

Wait and watch

All these edits of AK who plays the villain I believe

Everyone’s going gaga over him

https://x.com/anushqq/status/1997608160606224450

https://x.com/panindiareview/status/1997575936351568218

Akshaye Khanna just swayed his hands a bit like he does in all his movies..can’t believe people hyping it as a dance or a ‘vibe’..the music is good though..

And no AK is not the best thing about Dhurandhar..his role is best written..but his expressions haven’t changed one bit from what he did in DCH. Maybe its just me but I don’t like the squinted eyes down look that he gives. Him and Sunjay Dutt have done what they always do..even Rakesh Bedi..same.

But Arjun Rampal in his tiny role has risen above his wooden actor image and done better. And RS has absolutely reinvented himself. Strong, Silent, observant, restrained..different from his other roles, opposite to his personality.

About the film, the length doesn’t bother. Its engaging in every frame. Interval came after 2 hrs but I wasn’t waiting for it. But ya..TOO MUCH gore..way too much blood. Closed my eyes at every killing

Originally posted by: Clochette

Nothing in my post was targeted to you, dear, but it was a more general comment aimed at all those to whom it may have concerned.

550 crore Indian rupies today aren't the same as they had been 2 years ago... they are worth less now than what they had been worth then... that's why I think that boxoffice numbers are relative... one should not - imo - take the Bahubali 2 numbers and compare them - without respecting the inflation - with Dhurandhar's number (valid equally for every other movies which are years apart)... it is logical that ticket prices got raised...

Okay, first i know you didn't tag me and you posted for all but i wanted to reply here. Did you give same gyan to Ranbir - aliya fans fan Animal number is mentioned repetitively or for any other actors movie? If yes i will wait for your same post for their also.

This thread title contains BO discussion whats wrong in that. I know this amount doesn't great and i also knows records going to broken in future since before ticket rates RS 1 Rs 5 anf now between 250-350 and in future it will rise more. The real comparison should be sold tickets number but it should not bother by us if its giving happiness to Dhurandhar fans. Nothing wrong to posting numbers daily and repetitively.

And all knows why posting this numbers are special because so much negetive PR ran for movie even without watching it,Ban in gulf, just for hindi its doing really really better so yes numbers are matters for this movie

Okay... thanks for the reply

Dear, I think you misunderstood... I'm not against Dhurandhar's boxoffice success, I'm just against doing comparisons over box-office numbers

But that is just me, probably...others may have another thinking... in no way is it to demean the success of a movie as t h a t is an actual thing

My own take is more about how a movie is made, what is shown as performances and the content - not about numbers (I may post numbers but they aren't really important to me personally)

Originally posted by: Clochette

Dear, I think you misunderstood... I'm not against Dhurandhar's boxoffice success, I'm just against doing comparisons over box-office numbers

Dear, If this is the case and i am mis understood its my fault. But if others doing it its okay. The thing is now a days most of the big star fans doing it so again this also okay.

And one other mark again i know its wasn't me but one user used Urduvood i think person is trying to say that Bollywood is generally not support hidu related movie but always there for movies which shows Muslim in good light and i agree.

See again out of topic dear but I really feel hurt when Bollywood does not offended by movies like Jodha Akbar which shows Muslim ruler good head to toe, Akbar was not good its just he less bad than ither cruel muslim rulers.

But when we made movies like Uri, Chaava, and Dhurandhar thats bad according to khans and other so called big stars, its propeganda movie but reality is all movies has so many evidence and we made on what happened actually.

https://x.com/taran_adarsh/status/2003750856949473405

Originally posted by: Prapti9

But when we made movies like Uri, Chaava, and Dhurandhar thats bad according to khans and other so called big stars, its propeganda movie but reality is all movies has so many evidence and we made on what happened actually.

bold: no...and I know it for a fact...

but there is no doubt about many movies made in recent times with painting a certain religion in a bad light which isn't right as religions are belief-systems, not political one...however, I agree, that religion is misused because of political reasons... and whichever religion does that, it is condemnable (and I also think that Islam misused by terrorists is a v e r y bad thing... like it had been with catholic religion in Middle Ages)...

bold: no, it's n o t about what happened "actually"... what has happened is just part of a fictionalized narration... neither Uri nor Chaava not Dhurandhar happened like shown on screen... they made/make believe that it was the way it got narrated... but that is something, movies often do... so it's really up to the audience what they want to believe as having "actually" happened (or maybe informing themselves through - different - sources available in the Net)