Originally posted by: Ravisadha
Yes, you are absolutely rightâif the intention was to first show evil winning and then good ultimately triumphing, there would be no problem in waiting patiently for that justice. But if we look at this showâs writing graph, it clearly tells a different story.
In this show, evil consistently wins over good. Not once, but twice, they successfully broke Manvikâs marriage. From the holy episode till now, only Malla has been winning. Except for the poison kaand, none of her crimes were exposed, and even in that case, she never received any real punishment.
The SA caseâeven if it is exposed after seven yearsâwhat is the use? After such a long time, there will be no evidence left. The same applies to the case where Malla tried to kill Vikrant. Delayed exposure without consequences is meaningless.
If after every evil act the makers showed good winning over evil, it wouldnât hurt the audience this much. But here, every single time, it is evil that walks away victorious. The only character who was ever properly punished was Bobby, and nowâafter the leapâit seems Neetu might face consequences.
That imbalance is exactly what makes the story unbearable. This isnât a case of âevil before goodââthis is a pattern where good keeps losing, again and again. And that is why the audience feels exhausted, angry, and emotionally cheated.
1.5k