I guess this spoilt brat is still not able to digest that she got ejected due to “intent to hurt” someone hence giving bogus explanations and trying to shift the blame to someone else. Why the hell should GK inform her ki usko lagi hai you should take it seriously? And he did try telling her but she wasn’t even ready to listen. Salman ke aage bhi she kept blabbering the same nonsense “ sir I didn’t know usko lagi hai”, ye maharani kis cheez ka wait kar ri thi? Ki Tanya ko chot lag jati tabi apologise karti? Like you said, ek taraf Gaurav ki shadow banne se bhi problem hai upar se uske instructions bhi chaie to go apologise to someone. She is indeed a spoilt brat, wo toh Bajaj ki shadow mei iski meanness nahi dikhti thi.Originally posted by: asmitamohanty
She immediately started blaming GK in her interviews. Instead of taking responsibility, she’s twisting the entire story and conveniently making him the scapegoat. She literally said things like “GK didn’t tell me Tanya was hurt” and “He didn’t tell me he gave her ointment.” Like… what? Where is the logic in that?
GK told her multiple times, twice toh we have seen, actually, that she hit Tanya. Even Shahbaz pointed it out, and Tanya herself said it too. If someone tells you you’ve hurt someone, any sensible person would go check on them, right? But she didn’t. She stayed defensive, stubborn, showed attitude and now, after eviction, she’s acting like GK was supposed to spoon-feed her every detail.
That’s exactly why GK said, “I wish you had stayed in my shadow,” because clearly, she doesn’t use her own judgment. If you need someone to tell you when to apologize or show empathy, then yes, you do belong in their shadow. And then she got offended by that line? Girl, you’re proving it right. “He didn’t tell me Tanya needed ointment”, does he have to narrate every single thing to you? GK told you clearly that you hit her,he even asked her to apologise,GK's literal words were,"you are better than this". Shehbaaz confirmed it. Tanya confirmed it. What more do you need? Her eviction was completely justified...

?



247