GIFTS & FIGHTS 30.10 - Page 8

Originally posted by: A_Star39

equality is the main thing in families which keeps it stable.

I remember in gen 1 there was equality and practical decision making in property matters.

Phankas should calm down.I feel this is very much prevalent in our society after many years.Kajal is the child of the house and she has been spending her childhood there.

Kal ki aayi vidya cannot say Kajal to get out or stop her from entering the house when Sanjay has done a lot for poddars.

Ruhi and daksh are entitled to Rohit share in property.If dadi can care of maira ka education then why can't she make investments for daksh?Ruhi is working well and I can say that she is living a good life in Japan but Rohit ka hissa is of daksh and ruhi

Originally posted by: A_Star39

just because Tanya is a Bansal and Kajal is a daughter?

By that logic Abhinav is damad of goenkas and his children abhira and abhir shouldnt have gotten even a penny from goenka empire and estate.Naira and Kartik ki legacy ka bhi haq nahi dono ko.Kairav ka haq hai woh.If in story kairav and muskans daughter comes into the picture and she starts asserting her haq on Akshara dance academy and the legacy and property then what kind of uproar it will bring?

Manish had included ruhi and abhira in the property but not kairav and muskans kids.

Kya partiality hai

Morality wise maybe tanya krish they don't deserve a penny

But are you trying to tell me Sanjay phuphasa don't have any stake in firm? Agar uska sell hogya or maybe overtake he will get a good money

And if we are talking about morality wise, a couple /family section who has no stability, couldn't manage their finance enough that they are living on streets, their son ran away with a baby years back - aise family na hi hi business deserve krti hai na kuch

The reply is like beti ki shadi krdi so she don't have any rights... Nope married /unmarried girls have equal stakes in property. Kajal can go to court and get her share, that should be 1/3rd iirc, madhav Manoj and herself. Arman and bageera gets just the share of madhav. And if Sanjay phuphasa has lawyer stake he gets the business.. basically half property goes to bansals

Originally posted by: Rosh4rose

Now you expect me to agree everything it is not chatting na?

For that we must record own words and listen back

I loved only Ruhi she is not there rest all of them are alike .

I don't hate or like any one on particuler but totally dislike " Krish" but not the actor ...

Originally posted by: KC_1978

Actually shivani was the legal bahu and wife not vidya,she was married to Madhav first, she was not divorced also she didn't fought for her right,had she done it after returning vidya must have to back off as per court orders,and how come arman is illegal because he is Shivani's son as because his nd she was not accepted by poddar s only and not by Indian penal code,he is also son of madhav-the eldest son and child of poddars and by that logic Maira and kiara is also legal heiress until they are poddar with kaajal is married now and she is bansal, just because she is living here that doesn't mean she and her children will get equal rights , her maayka, and though Sanjay fufa used to run Poddar firm,it was only for poddars as dadaji established it and meant for his sons their sons only,fufa was just a caretaker only as madhav is on other profession,manoj was not so eligible,dadi was not any lawyer and her grandchildren were all minors then

Shivani was missing for years. She's legally dead. Vidya might be illegal wife but arman is legitimate like you said

The firm is only for poddars was a line said by kaveri. When the property went to Krish it showed us that line has no value. And Sanjay has been a lawyer to to firm, taking decision along with kaveri arman. So he should have a claim legally. It's like how suits serial used to have naming partner. I imagine phuphasa will have something like that

Krish tanya gets right simply because of kajal. She gets equal share of property. Arman gets only madhavs share. If kaveri don't give kajal her share she's in her rights to file a case and get money. There are so many stories around us, when properties are divided married sisters gets their rights too. I think that's as per Hindu laws or something or maybe property law

Heiress is only as per father/mother's lineage. Again Kiara gets Manoj's share. If tomorrow my father's family divides their property, through my father I get that share. There is no individual share for me

Originally posted by: Mehersudha

better not chat when pov differ that's what I said. Did I tell you to agree or accept what I said. Because the discussion won't stop or come to a conclusion it's better 🤗. Loving or hating ruhi is not the main issue now. Ruhi is mocked kicked by us or we more than anyone.

Okay.......chill this is an ITV drama

Anyways now let us wait for tomorrows story ....Conclusion for today ...

Ye kartik ki life mein kitni girls thi 😆ak bilkul baap jaisa damad choose karke gayi heh 🤣jaha jata heh ek ladki ko leke aata heh 😂🤣

Originally posted by: viji2111

Did kuch nahi chahiye wali Abhira accept the property papers or not??

If dadi gave vidya kajal similar gifts why not give equal gifts to kiara Tanya and abheera. My mil fil has given necklaces to all grand daughters equally when they are grown up. from grand kids birth till now beta or beti bahu or beti , beta or damad it's all same same any day. It's similar in my parents house too. We never asked anything. Bday or marriage day or kids gifts anything till now same same for betis bahu, grandson or daughter or damad or son. If people show that partiality then only fights start so why as parents initiate that.

Waise arohi ki beti getting money uska kya relation hai poddars se lol

Yeah arohis beti got and akthus beti too so point kya hai 🤣

Originally posted by: Rosh4rose

Okay.......chill this is an ITV drama

Anyways now let us wait for tomorrows story ....Conclusion for today ...