Originally posted by: firewings_diya
Nope, I personally love my surname. My point is, DKP is making fl to retain her surname so that the audience can know why she is suffering
. Personally, I feel bad for Abhira. I do sympathize with her. I would have sympathized with her more if it had been non-legacy shows. I have always been taught that whatever karma you do, if you don't get it in your current life, your kids may get it on your behalf. My parents think 1000 times before doing something bad to others to avoid getting that in return.
But Sharmas were never punished for destroying Abhimanyu, Ruhi, Arohi, and Neil's lives . They were made to suffer because of the poor decision-making skills of Abhira's mom and dad. They never got karma for what they did. So based on whatever I have been taught, I don't feel bad for her as she is getting what her parents sowed.
I only said DKP is ensuring the audience knows that she is a Sharma, as many people like me who believe in karma will not feel bad for Abhira.
Abhir is anyways, i hardly care about him he is only akshara's son for me.
Her sasural never ruined her, giving divorce < A grown-up son and dil dying due to poor decision of fl. I have been saying this multiple times. Abhimanyu gave a divorce as he wanted to save his rest of his family members, as fl never tried to understand what her choti si galti is costing him and his family. But that doesn't give her a free pass to change the father of her son. She literally took revenge on Abhimanyu for giving her a divorce.
Because of her, Abhimanyu lost his son like brother, his child, the other child doesn't even recognize him as father, and his mother was hospitalized due to a stroke. What did Akshu lose? She found a new husbandji, she had abhir whom she risked in that incident when Neil died. Eventually, she had everything, and it was her decision to stay away from goenkas and raise Abhir in poor conditions, so nobody forced her, and I won't consider it as suffering.
I don't want to have a debate on Gen3, but I know that people here will understand my intention regarding the surname. My intention was only to highlight whatever you sow, eventually it will come to you. If not to you, then it can hit your kids, too.
I merely had an issue with the fact that someone retaining their maiden name does not equal the karmphal of their deeds. That doesn't sit right with me.
Sis, what role did Akshara really play in Neil’s death? Wasn’t it all purely circumstantial? She didn’t ask him to go and fight 10 gundas like a hero. Frankly, he should have exercised more sense. This is exactly like Aarohi accusing Akshara of killing Sirat when she simply slipped down the stairs. (And saying “she slipped because she followed Akshara " isn’t logical — she could’ve slipped anywhere& died.)
Is abandoning your pregnant wife — who is going through a difficult pregnancy — really the solution for your family’s suffering? He didn’t even hear her out properly. Sorry, I can’t subscribe to that. But hey, you’re entitled to your opinion.
Akshara (OG) was inherently a good person — yeah, she made some dumb choices, but I don’t recall her ever ruining anyone’s life. Yet Naira still had a tumultuous journey. Naitik was a decent guy too, and Naksh still suffered. Don’t tell me they weren’t good people either.
Naira or Kartik weren't bad people, minus the EMA debacle. Were they so bad to warrant the life Akshara had? Idts. But again, that’s a matter of perspective.
Sometimes, our own actions define us — not just our parents’ karma. That was the only point I was trying to make. I’m not defending anyone’s actions — not Abhimanyu’s, not Akshara’s, and sure as hell not Abhinav’s.
and no I'm not saying your parents' mistakes don't affect you at all, it merely doesn't your influence karmphal, that's all. 
CID
Music Corner
