India's Operation Sindoor Updates (Thread 2) - Page 48

That’s the difference. India is against terrorism and Pakistan is against India and openly supporting terrorism. The whole country is either brain washed or delusional.

Their news channels might be showing a different picture.

Btw kudos to your efforts in getting that anti-Indian article deactivated.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

I respect the work by our army. But information warfare is equally important

Globally Pakistan is being taken as a victim and Indian as a aggressors.

Global support is as much needed

I am not seeing anywhere where Pakistan is a victim globally. In fact I have seen so many news channels like Sky where they have categorically called out Pak as state sponsor of terror and even had their defense minister confessing to grooming terrorists. Fox News in US also did the same.

I am seeing enough globally to know for sure that we don’t even need information warfare when the world knows Pakistan is a state sponsor of terror

Originally posted by: carisma2

Did you go to a madraasa?

I did.

You clearly did not go to the one I went to.

Side note, Sikhs carry a talwaar, when they behead an enemy they recite Wahi Guru di. If someone didn't understand, they can take this in the wrong sense too.

Islam doesn't teach violence. Yes it talks about War. I mean naturally during a war there would have been sword fights, the Quran will not say, they threw garlands around each other's necks. Same with your transcripts.

I have said this before, I will say it again. Terrorists who go out and kill people, like in Pahalgam were wrong. This was a attack, a terrorist attack. Against religion itself. Just for some people's actions, you cannot condemn an entire faith. There is a difference.

Back in the day, wars that were fought by Muslims were around religion. They were being stopped from preaching Islam. They were being tortured. Each verse has a full story. If you don't know the story the simple translations will not show you the clear picture.

As the enemies were going to ambush them, in their defence they were given permission to kill. The enemies were non Muslims. Back then they were nor categorised as Indians and Americans. It was Muslims, non Muslims that were.at war.

So maybe you need to attend a right madrassa to know what madraasa's are really about.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Why isn’t Pakistan forum closed here? Their actors and public figures have spoken actively against India and YET INDIA Forum continues to have a page which discusses them.

I don’t know if this is the right thread to talk about this.

Originally posted by: carisma2

Quran cannot be changed. What's recorded in it, is things that happened historically. Yes it can be used as a guide, but as the world evolves, we have scholars who guide. Besides most states are democratic and follow democratic rules of their country. For example, Islamic law would be to chop the hands off, of thieves. But under democratic law, we would seek legal route.

Non Muslims, is in English. Kaafir is in Arabic meaning the same. Quran says Kaafir, because the language was Arabic. Back then the dharmic religion existed, but it was not given names such as Hinduism, Sikhism etc so it just fell under the same bracket as non Muslims. I believe only Jewish back then were called Yahudi. I agree, there is no need to use the word Kaafir, if it offends.

The kind of thing that happened in Pahalgham should not have happened. It was outrageous. The people behind it should be punished. My argument is, in trying to punish the ones responsible, do not punish the innocent ones. If that happens, naturally the attacks will only increase and both ways. Both countries will be destroyed not just one. Naturally any country will go after terrorists and it is their right to do so. Like look what Israel did to Gazza, to look for Hamas group, they destroyed the Gazza, civilians suffered.

Thank you for your comments. You put your view forward respectfully. I appreciate that.

Fact is

India isn't attacking innocents, they never did and never will.

It is Pak who attacked in Pahalgam, now attacked in Poonch and trying to attacking our border areas.

& usse pehle there have been n number of terror attacks done by them, which led to soo many innocent Indians losing their lives.

India is not the attacker nor Pakistan and their public is innocent.

This is the fact which is constant from 1947, it is same now and it won't change in future bcoz Indians Pakistan ki tarah girenge nahi and Pakistan kabhi sudherega nahi.

No drama will change the fact Pakistan has always harmed India and Indians and when India retaliate that by never harming their local public, Pakistan can't play victim specially after wrapping terrorists in Pakistan flag and denying their own soldiers bodies after losing the war.

People have literally audicity to say that their country don't support terrorism when Osama bin laden found in their country

They will still say unki gov ko nahi oata tha ki Osama kab unki country me aake rehne laga

I mean come on.. World people are not bunch of fools and delulu like them

Originally posted by: Phir_Mohabbat

People need to shift to India defense Sub reddit where a mega thread is going on, mods are strict about bs posts, and no pak sympathetizers there unlike so called India forums

Let this website die along with padosi mulk

If someone don't want to make account fine they can just scroll there and be updated.

Why should we fight online in this shit ass website when country going through war? Ain't nobody got time energy for that.

Well said . my post on how india hate going here since ages got deleted . Promote antis n hate n try to silence Indians n ban them . Have other Indian platforms . Already this anti india forum is desert . Let be happy with their outsiders . outsiders keep Indian names for restaurants so tat audience comes . Same happening here . Keep india forums name n spread india hate n try to brainwash Indians . Here lectures Indians whom to vote also outsiders n torture Indians . No wonder this place is desert like failed state. no place to negativity.

That’s good. It should never reopen.

Originally posted by: Arreyaar

My dear friend carisma was once hell bent on proving me how ranbir is the best in bollywood and I should like ranbir

I have interacted with her and she can be pretty repetitive so let it be

(Tho carisma I must tell you I was not impressed with any of the points you gave me to prove ranbir is the best)

Dude that was you?

I can't even remember. You know I'm in and out of forums so don't even recognise the ones I'm friends with or not other than a few.

Oh be fair, I kind of left that convincing thing half way coz I left IF for a while. And I never expected you to really fall for Bira, you should have known my humour better. 😂😂

Thankyou. Yes I am repetitive, just in IF.. because people have comprehension issues. I'm glad you noticed my efforts.

Originally posted by: carisma2

Did you go to a madraasa?

I did.

You clearly did not go to the one I went to.

Side note, Sikhs carry a talwaar, when they behead an enemy they recite Wahi Guru di. If someone didn't understand, they can take this in the wrong sense too.

Islam doesn't teach violence. Yes it talks about War. I mean naturally during a war there would have been sword fights, the Quran will not say, they threw garlands around each other's necks. Same with your transcripts.

I have said this before, I will say it again. Terrorists who go out and kill people, like in Pahalgam were wrong. This was a attack, a terrorist attack. Against religion itself. Just for some people's actions, you cannot condemn an entire faith. There is a difference.

Back in the day, wars that were fought by Muslims were around religion. They were being stopped from preaching Islam. They were being tortured. Each verse has a full story. If you don't know the story the simple translations will not show you the clear picture.

As the enemies were going to ambush them, in their defence they were given permission to kill. The enemies were non Muslims. Back then they were nor categorised as Indians and Americans. It was Muslims, non Muslims that were.at war.

So maybe you need to attend a right madrassa to know what madraasa's are really about.

It was not Back in the day.. The islamic conquest is happening right in the present. Had muslims left the killings back in the day we would have definitely be living in a peaceful world alltogether. All the terrorists being trained to kill are not being taught the sanitised version of Islam that you are propagating over here but the raw, literal, english translation very much in Arabic, that you are saying we are misunderstanding..