Baap Beti Parallels - Page 3

Originally posted by: Agni_Jytsona

That's too mature for some people mate. Especially when they don't even know or understand how surrogacy works.

Everyone knows how surrogacy works but what happened to sperm donor not being real father but the one who put efforts was the father irrespective of legalities?

Egg donor is a mother now, what about the woman who is carrying the child, what about the woman whose tolerating the pain associated with pregnancy and nurturing the child, suddenly for you genes and legalities are more important than the efforts, hypocrisy right?

Ruhi is mother of the child like Abhinav was the father

Now be mature and support the mother who is actually doing everything for the child instead of supporting egg donor

Originally posted by: Randomlurker

What I seriously don’t understand is why these “moral policing” and don’t troll, be mature posts magically appear only when something bad is said about the leads..Where was this so-called “intelligent thinking ” when people were trolling Ruhi, Vidya, or Kaveri? No one was crying about “it’s just a show” back then.

Now suddenly when it's about your fave, y’all wanna act like saints preaching peace and maturity. Every character is fictional jeez, not just the ones you don’t like. So stop with the selective outrage. It's getting so repetitive If people think it’s totally fine to troll Ruhi—wish miscarriage, her baby’s death, or even her own death—and call it “just fiction,” then why does it suddenly become a moral issue when someone trolls Abhira? How come when it’s about Ruhi (fictional character) , it’s fun and harmless trolling, but when it’s about Abhira( fictional character) , people start giving lectures on society, morals, and values?

And let’s not forget—the same kind of people who say “don’t stoop so low to troll a fictional character” are the ones who clapped and cheered when another fictional woman was getting dragged left, right, and center. Here’s the truth: If trolling one fictional character is wrong, then trolling all fictional characters is wrong. You can’t pick and choose when to bring ethics into fandom conversations just because your preferred character is under fire.

So yeah, don’t play moral police only when your fave gets hit. Keep the same energy for all, or admit the double standards. Because at the end of the day, all these characters are fictional—and if someone is okay with trolling one, they have no moral ground to police others. 🤡🤡🤡🤡

From here onwards i will be calling her as kachri only because kuch logon ke religious sentiments hurts toh ho hurt mujhe kya. Abhinav is kachra , abhira is kachri. You can call abhimanyu dogman, lustyman neither i cared for that before not i will care now as abhimanyu was a character they can say whatever you want as long as they don't force their opinion on me or call me dumb or andhi for putting my points. 😑

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

Everyone knows how surrogacy works but what happened to sperm donor not being real father but the one who put efforts was the father irrespective of legalities?

Egg donor is a mother now, what about the woman who is carrying the child, what about the woman whose tolerating the pain associated with pregnancy and nurturing the child, suddenly for you genes and legalities are more important than the efforts, hypocrisy right?

Ruhi is mother of the child like Abhinav was the father

Now be mature and support the mother who is actually doing everything for the child instead of supporting egg donor

Abhinav was always the father. Ruhi here is a surrogate. Both are different. But you can believe whatever you want

Originally posted by: Agni_Jytsona

Abhinav was always the father. Ruhi here is a surrogate. Both are different. But you can believe whatever you want

The difference is called hypocrisy

If Abhinav was father then Ruhi is the mother

Legally and Biologically - Abhimanyu was father and Abhira is mother

But mature people who claim to know the laws of surrogacy simply refuse to educate themselves

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

The difference is called hypocrisy

If Abhinav was father then Ruhi is the mother

Legally and Biologically - Abhimanyu was father and Abhira is mother

But mature people who claim to know the laws of surrogacy simply refuse to educate themselves

No. No. Not hypocrisy. Just little understanding of how surrogacy works.

Abhira is not abonding her kid. Is she?

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

No

But the first reply said surrogate was incubator and used derogatory terms for members - real people but you don't have any issues with that, you had issues with the follow up reply

Ye hypocrisy kya kehlata hai?

So surrogate can be called anything but not egg donor?

Even in this thread the first derogatory remark came from Abhira fan but you didn't have any issues with it, that Abhira fan not only abused Ruhi but other members as well but wo to chalta hai na

Definitely, Mswhiskerson, the hypocrisy is laughable, the first reply on this thread clearly personally targeted & used so much of derogatory terms & crass language for real people, but that would never catch their attention, they're totally okay with her because it was suiting their purpose, derogatory remarks were being passed on others, had the same user mocked & personally targeted them, which that member is known for doing, they would've riled up, cried foul to Mods & labelled others as bullies & trollers & having meltdowns as to how world is cruel & unfair for Abhinav & Abhira Because yardstick is different for others

According to them, how dare aapne unke pyaare non-existent fictional characters Abhinav-Akshara-Abhira ko bash or troll kiya, agar personal statements paas karna & bash karna hai toh do that to real people- members from the opposite fandom , then they would have no issues, their full silent support to people making derogatory remarks on real people over fictional and sometimes toh openly too.
Yesterday, itself I saw how a person was personally targeting & passing remarks on me- "a real person" openly. Expect no better, trolling of fictional characters is more noticeable than personal targeting of real people

Originally posted by: Agni_Jytsona

No. No. Not hypocrisy. Just little understanding of how surrogacy works.

Abhira is not abonding her kid. Is she?

Surrogacy is not blanket term for all paternity laws, so maybe gain a little understanding of other laws while we are at it, since you were questioning other's knowledge while you continuously trying to prove how a random roadside man gets paternity of the child, without biological father's consent

Legal terms are clear but your stand on both is different

Yes. yes - Hypocrisy rather double standards

Originally posted by: Bibliophiles

Definitely, Mswhiskerson, the hypocrisy is laughable, the first reply on this thread clearly personally targeted & used so much of derogatory terms & crass level language for real people, but they've totally agree & okay with her because it was suiting their purpose, derogatory remarks were being passed on others, had the same user mocked & personally targeted them, which that member is known for doing, they would've riled up, cried foul & labelled others as bullies & trollers & having meltdowns

According to them, how dare aapne unke pyaare non-existent fictional characters Abhinav-Akshara-Abhira ko bash or troll kiya, agar personal statements paas karna & bash karna hai to do that to members who're real people from the opposite fandom , they have their full silent support to people making derogatory remarks on real people over fictional and sometimes toh openly too. Yesterday, itself I saw how a person was personally targeting & passing remarks on real people openly. Expect no better....

That's the thing, you make any thread on Abhira and these Abhinav's bhakts come and start abusing people, then other bhakts come and act holier than thou on reactions to the first abusive reply

The first reply gets support and celebrations from them

Originally posted by: Agni_Jytsona

No. No. Not hypocrisy. Just little understanding of how surrogacy works.

Abhira is not abonding her kid. Is she?

I think in tv they didn’t show Abhimanyu andonding his kid ,that’s y he won the custody case

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

Because Abhimanyu, Ruhi etc are mere characters for everyone

But Abhinav is bhagwan and Abhira is bhagwan ki beti

India still has blasphemy law, ab kisiki andh shraddha ka kya kiya ja sakta hai

If people are so blindly in love with khoon then all abhimanyu fans should support abhir. I don't think anyone doing here. People have bedhakaled abhir 😄 but kya kare people only think everyone are obsessed with non existing khooni legacy.