Was SRK in Jawan better acting than Ranbir in Animal? - Page 4

Yes

And I have noticed one thing, Vanga gets all the criticism but Ranbir Kapoor gets the award . If it was a SRK film , nobody would have cared about the director or filmmaker

Ranbir's Performance is one the greatest performance in the history of Hindi cinema

word!!

Haven’t seen either of these movies. But if I have to put my money on for better acting - it would be Ranbir any day.

Animal was garnished in violence, but had an appetizing sultry nature to it.

Originally posted by: forza

SRK as Old Vikram Rathor was amazing, nothing great about flop kapoor performance, just wanna be Sanjay Dutt as always.

'Organic hit' something which SRK can't boast of his releases in the same year.

The younger role in Jawan was shit acting. Salman has been playing the old Vikram Rathore for a long time,nothing new.

What a boring 'game' (I guess from people not satisfied with their own life)..just to bash the same actors/actresses again & again the same topics are made again & again...with the same goals again & again ...

Originally posted by: JackSparrowcraz

Animal was one of the highest grossers made more than Saif has done.

'Organic hit' something which SRK can't boast of his releases in the same year.

The younger role in Jawan was shit acting. Salman has been playing the old Vikram Rathore for a long time,nothing new.

did I mention Saif in my comment? looks like yo have personal problem with him

Originally posted by: forza

did I mention Saif in my comment? looks like yo have personal problem with him

No I am not Saif fan nor a SRK fans minion.

Both of them weren't good. SRK probably has had two decent performances in the last 15 years, MNIK and DZ. Ranbir can do better. Animal wasn't it.

Originally posted by: Filmistan

Both of them weren't good. SRK probably has had two decent performances in the last 15 years, MNIK and DZ. Ranbir can do better. Animal wasn't it.

The only take that’s spot on here.