Originally posted by: Clochette
Lux was endosed by those actresses (also including Katrina)...and by SRK.
As I already wrote...why not try to bring Lux back into focus through using SRK's daughter?
And what kind of reproach is this being SRK's daughter...it may be her luck (as someone wrote) but it is more used as a stain on her personality. At least there is no Karan Johar to profit from mentoring her...
As for the arguments about her looks and her acting performances, screen presence etc...they depend either on personal preferences or because Suhana is easy to make an object of bashing (like so many others here - star-kids also).
I find the whole nepotism debate mainly quite unfair: exception when I get to know that a star-kid gets a role that already had been promised to an 'outsider'.
I believe that no star-kid that doesn't work on the craft will remain as a leading character after many unsuccessful/rejected movies.
Suhana just made a movie with an ensemble cast with a director whose movie got rejected - certainly not only because of Suhana...
If one doesn't like the ad with Suhana, that's okay to me...what I don't find okay are the way the same arguments are repeated again and again, sometimes like if the writer enjoys to make it extra-negative. I find this also repulsive when this happens with other actresses (it's mostly with actresses, less with actors). In my opinion, that is highly judgemental.
What are you on about? I didn’t even use words such as nepo or privilege anywhere
Lux is not a luxury brand or magical beauty treatment but traditionally only top stars known both for looks and accomplishments used to appear in their ads. That's how it used to be in the 20th century at least
So for me the name Lux conjures up images of Hema, Sri, Juhi etc
I understand things have changed as they always do... Maybe Suhana can bring in new customers now
As I said I've moved on from Lux and Suhana.
40