So basically a girl, whose mother has just died saving the very man she’s forced her to marry for her safety, is gracious enough to offer the man an exit route and say let’s treat this as a marriage of convenience until I complete my education and am able to stand on my own feet …I know that neither of us wants this marriage so let’s just treat it as an arrangement between us. The man requests her to keep this between them, since he would not want his family to know of this.. Contrast this to a woman, who accepts the first proposal she gets, because she believes that her soulmate ghosted her. This on the basis of a few missed calls and some girl picking up his phone one time. She doesn’t even think her soulmate is worth giving a chance to, maybe he has a valid explanation for whatever has happened. Then when she learns the truth, she wants to call off her engagement and wants said soulmate to tell the world of their love. Worse still, the fact is she is engaged to his brother. When soulmate flat out refuses but begs her to go ahead and marry his brother, she agrees because that is a way for her to stay close to soulmate. She wishes her missing husband dead when there is news of his maybe having been found. She prepares divorce papers and presents them before a girl who’s almost lost her home. The point is not who said what and who enabled her. This woman is touching thirty and still has no morals or scruples of her own. Now this paragon of virtue is superior to the girl I spoke of earlier. And the contract marriage is going to invite greater censure than the Second Lady’s act of marrying one man to stay close to another..wah re Prabhu..bas Abhira ko sooli pe chandna dekhna hai..jag ka Kalyan hojayega!!!
Edited by sharadrocks - 2 years ago
563