Can we not celebrate Animal. - Page 18

Originally posted by: Blueeeee

I didn't. Irrespective of whether y's stan would have called out the film if y had done the film or not; it doesn't nullify their right to criticise the actor x who did this film. Also, if everyone in the industry would have given an arm to do a rapey-film like this, all of them would have deserved the bashing too

Save the "I-am-not-like-thooose-girls" condescension for someone else. Lol

Once again, you're off the mark. May the comprehension skills be bestowed upon you by the divine.

Criticism of a movie is every viewers' right, but demanding or wishing to stop someone from showing their art because it doesn't sit well with your point of view or ideals is just so plain stupid. This is extremism disguised as intellectual elitism.

Originally posted by: FatalFlaw

Once again, you're off the mark. May the comprehension skills be bestowed upon you by the divine.

Once again, brining up y in a topic about x is called a strawman and red herring, may you be able to put your points across with substantial evidence rather than having to resort to deflection with condescension. I won't evoke the divine in this due to the good faith that you are an adult and know what you are doing.

Saral bhasha mein : Ranveer ke bure hone se Ranbir absolve nahi ho jaata

Aur saral bhasha mein : Whataboutery kisi cheez ka evidence nahi hota. Bas cowards ka paintara hota hai.

Originally posted by: FatalFlaw

Unlike Ranveer Teresa, always so ethical and careful about the influence and impact his movies have on youth and society, right? I bet he'd give his arm for a role like Animal if it had come his way.

Wasn’t Ranveer Vanga’s first choice for KS which Ranveer rejected because of the role being too dark for him?

Originally posted by: loginidran

Wasn’t Ranveer Vanga’s first choice for KS which Ranveer rejected because of the role being too dark for him?

No.

Ranveer Singh is not a saint. There are tons and tons of problematic incidents of him. Please do not derail this thread for that man

Originally posted by: FatalFlaw

No.

Originally posted by: Ur-Miserable

Criticism of a movie is every viewers' right, but demanding or wishing to stop someone from showing their art because it doesn't sit well with your point of view or ideals is just so plain stupid. This is extremism disguised as intellectual elitism.

Who here is saying that bad/problematic art cannot be made? But saying that someone should be able to make something that demonises a marginalised group in public psyche without any backlash because it's their freedom of speech is a massive massive blindspot towards your own privilege.

In a country where women, men, and non-binary folks die due to the lack of menstrual healthcare, where litlte girls are pulled out of school as soon as they hit menarche, clips of a damn popular actor berating women for wearing pads is going viral on social media. Social media where A-certification doesn't mean shit. Is it going viral because Ranbir was oscar-worthy? Is the full context of the film provided in the viral clips with a discretion to separate real from real?

And people are invalidating any accountability as "it's just a film," delusion," "woke lecture," and "intellectual elitism" all to defend men who are actually socially and financially elite. Lol.

Originally posted by: loginidran

hain?




https://www.outlookindia.com/art-entertainment/sandeep-reddy-vanga-reveals-ranveer-singh-was-the-first-choice-for-kabir-singh--news-333596

Yep, vanga said kabir singh was offered to ranveer first and he said no because it was too dark of a film

Celebrating animals involves recognizing their intrinsic value, promoting conservation, and fostering humane treatment. However, it's essential to avoid supporting activities that exploit or harm them. Responsible celebration should prioritize ethical treatment, conservation efforts, and awareness to ensure a harmonious coexistence between humans and animals while respecting their rights and well-being.