Oh, how much I hate this! Some media are writing just anything to get clicks (which is money).
"Hey, write something that bring clicks!" is the motto..."especially the headline...it should hit!" (not a big difference to the news on paper).
Journalistic ethics have gone since long for most of those working as employed or freelance scribes.
There is no proof, no mention from Nayanthara's side relative to what is written. In the contrary, the first occasion to join Atlee and SRK outside of a promotional event, brought them together.
Yes, Deepika's role has a great impact, but Nayanthara's role is the one that gives a lot of room for more in a sequal. It is a better built-up role then Deepika's one who just serves as an emotionally intense flashback for the Azad - Vikram relation...to give a special value to the father-son story (a gorgeous idea, imo). Logic says that Narmada's and Azad's love story simply cannot be of the oh-so-romantic side, but she is rather mature and fascinating...and there is a lot of entertaining interaction between them.
Originally posted by: Clochette
Oh, how much I hate this! Some media are writing just anything to get clicks (which is money).
"Hey, write something that bring clicks!" is the motto..."especially the headline...it should hit!" (not a big difference to the news on paper).
Journalistic ethics have gone since long for most of those working as employed or freelance scribes.
There is no proof, no mention from Nayanthara's side relative to what is written. In the contrary, the first occasion to join Atlee and SRK outside of a promotional event, brought them together.
Yes, Deepika's role has a great impact, but Nayanthara's role is the one that gives a lot of room for more in a sequal. It is a better built-up role then Deepika's one who just serves as an emotionally intense flashback for Azad's relation to Vikram...to give a special value to the father-son story (a gorgeous idea, imo). Logic says that Narmada's and Azad's love story simply cannot be of the oh-so-romantic side, but she is rather mature and fascinating.
She was there at ambani ganesh festival where SRK FAMILY atlee with wife and many celebs were present
Media being media
This is why she doesn't give interviews 🤦♀️ the writer should at least read the article they have mentioned
I am never really her fan in south but she has done films with all superstars almost everyone with whom she has a smaller role and some are directed by Atlee and she shine alongside with the superstars she worked with. I doubt this article whatever role she has done,she does it with with utmost conviction. Jawan i have not seen the film but those who saw everyone praises her performance & chemistry with SRK
I suppose that this was written by people who haven't seen her before in a South movie and/or don't know about her roles there and her acting...
Why don't these journos do some basic research before writing trash. They wrote the entire article based on the reason that "she is missing from promotions coz she is upset" and in the end they are saying "it seems this is not a recent trend and she doesn't promote her films".
Which means your whole article is bullshit. Did she or Atlee tell you that they fought?
One Google search will tell you when and why she decided not to be part of promotional activities.
Bas headline spicy bana do and article body me kachra bhar do. Thing is one website publishes this and the rest of them pick it up immediately, with 0 regard for how true the information is.
Just 2-3 days ago, media declared Sai Pallavi is married. And there were articles like '5 ways in which Sai Pallavi proved colour does not matter in love'. Media is so used to dishing out such backhanded insults. Does the guy not have feelings?
Pehle pata toh kar lo shadi hui bhi ki nahi. The pic was from some film event. She has not got married. So so stupid people are.
Exactly...it's just to get clicks oneself, too...that's one of the negative sides of the Internet... and diligence in reporting has no value anymore... sad
I doubt this is true. They were both great in the movie
comment:
p_commentcount