Posted:
I completely agree with you. I used to think that VG got destroyed because of Samrat but no, it met its fate because of the incompetent royalty. Samrat has all the traits of a ruler and he’d have ruled it competently. Of course he wouldn’t have been kind but he’s smart & clever. VG needs to end for humanity to prevail and honestly it is Maharani who is the root cause of everything. She lived in human conditions whereas Dhruv’s dad first lost his family, his dignity and then his mental balance. Poor Saxena family only got trouble because of maa-beti yaar.
We were cursing Maharishi for keep telling *Mahaveer shouldn't have been alive* when Dhruv saved his life..
But by time I am understanding his stand
Yes! Maharishi's statement sahi tha.. Even though 17th century incidents also were correct.. If Tara didn't do TT and brought DD means Mahaveer wouldn't have been alive now! Tara would have ended up marrying Senapati Samrat and he would have ruled the Kingdom by his own style! But this Nalayak Devi ne TT kar ke sab kuch destroy kar diya
Vallabhgad destroyed because of Tara and Maharani only!!!! They tortured two innocent persons thats why Vallabhgad went inside soil..
Debate Mansion
Pati Patni Aur Panga
Indian Mythology
66