Insecurity [DT NOTE PG 2,8] - Page 10

Originally posted by: Deltablues

Okay cool. This is boring but here some facts given by you :

Your aunt's ex reconciled with her and they had your cousin in 2000ish? Cool.

Then your aunt remarried your uncle in 2005. Some 3-5 years later.

Did your cousin not have a birth certificate for 3-5 years in the 2000s? That is highly unlikely. You refuse to provide any information on this point. Anyway, I don't have any proof that you are not making this up like you rightly doubt the veracity of some members LLB/LLM degrees here.

Whoever is the father on the birth certificate is the legal guardian of your cousin, if it's your aunt's first husband, then your cousin will have a stake in his property. If it's your uncle, then your cousin is his legal heir.

Father's name is not mandatory for passports since 2016.

https://m.indiatimes.com/news/father-s-name-no-longer-mandatory-on-passports-sadhus-can-use-their-guru-s-name-instead-268039.html

https://m.timesofindia.com/city/delhi/For-passport-mothers-name-sufficient-in-some-cases-HC/articleshow/52367832.cms

https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/mothers-name-sufficient-for-passport-high-court-1408568

So, your cousin's case doesn't apply to Abhir.

Lastly, assuming in good faith that you are not making this up, your cousin and his (step) parents are not the only people in India. We are the most populous country, and courts don't decide something just on the basis of one precedent.

I know for a fact that when it comes to legal heir/legal parenthood, biology is a moot point. It's the birth certificate and other official records that come into play. I have seen it in my own social circle.

Okay so let's come back to the show now:

1. Akshara isn't denying that AbhiM is the father of Abhir. She herself agreed k haan maine naam likh diya and all.

2. If they were so strong in their legalities. Why fear of AbhiM knowing the truth.

3. AbhiM filed the case it's on hold or withdrawn no idea but it started. Hence, we know that court is agreeing to the fact that AbhiM is the father so in case aage bdhta then it would have come to the fact that kaun deserving. Is par i would say Akshnav hain. Bht ache se rkha hai. I didn't like financials point out krna bhi and as i am vocal now i was then and tab Abhi fans ne bura bnaya tha mereko.

4. I will say it again that there are many loop hools when it comes to fatherly rights. And what AK did was wrong and as i said India mein chal ja rha hai but bahar nahi chalta. As someone who is going to be a lawyer AK ne forgery ki hai in legal documents which is not a crime like umar kaid dedenge and all but it's wrong.

5. And when i said k Abhinav ko incase of AK demise nahi milegi custody I meant it. Abi recently similar case i studied. What happened is father died mother was pregnant in laws ne nikal diya. Mother remarried.

Then years later mother died in laws ko varis ki yaad aayi so case gya court mein yahan in laws galat the still unko right mila and bache ka benefit yeh hua k property mein part.

6. And let's forget other cases coz sabka apna apna point hai. In this case main yahi toh keh rhi hun k Abhimanyu can also prove k bhai mujhe toh miscarriage btaya gya mujhe toh btaya nahi baby hai hence i was missing in action for so many years.

Then also AK did not try enough why i say this coz she is now letting Manjari stay at home, laughing with her, Goenkas k saath party ho rhi hai when all was not so bad toh ap unko visit karke btate.

Yahi loophole bhi PH ne rkha hai just to show dono galat the. Jo in a way the bhi

Is sab mein Abhinav bechara phsa hai and I will never say he is bad person and all i just don't enjoy his character. Sabse important toh yeh hai k ek acha character aese kaise bna skte ho k log pasand na karein.

Hopefully I made my points clear now.

Originally posted by: chaipaani

Okay so let's come back to the show now:

1. Akshara isn't denying that AbhiM is the father of Abhir. She herself agreed k haan maine naam likh diya and all.

2. If they were so strong in their legalities. Why fear of AbhiM knowing the truth.

3. AbhiM filed the case it's on hold or withdrawn no idea but it started. Hence, we know that court is agreeing to the fact that AbhiM is the father so in case aage bdhta then it would have come to the fact that kaun deserving. Is par i would say Akshnav hain. Bht ache se rkha hai. I didn't like financials point out krna bhi and as i am vocal now i was then and tab Abhi fans ne bura bnaya tha mereko.

4. I will say it again that there are many loop hools when it comes to fatherly rights. And what AK did was wrong and as i said India mein chal ja rha hai but bahar nahi chalta. As someone who is going to be a lawyer AK ne forgery ki hai in legal documents which is not a crime like umar kaid dedenge and all but it's wrong.

5. And when i said k Abhinav ko incase of AK demise nahi milegi custody I meant it. Abi recently similar case i studied. What happened is father died mother was pregnant in laws ne nikal diya. Mother remarried.

Then years later mother died in laws ko varis ki yaad aayi so case gya court mein yahan in laws galat the still unko right mila and bache ka benefit yeh hua k property mein part.

6. And let's forget other cases coz sabka apna apna point hai. In this case main yahi toh keh rhi hun k Abhimanyu can also prove k bhai mujhe toh miscarriage btaya gya mujhe toh btaya nahi baby hai hence i was missing in action for so many years.

Then also AK did not try enough why i say this coz she is now letting Manjari stay at home, laughing with her, Goenkas k saath party ho rhi hai when all was not so bad toh ap unko visit karke btate.

Yahi loophole bhi PH ne rkha hai just to show dono galat the. Jo in a way the bhi

Is sab mein Abhinav bechara phsa hai and I will never say he is bad person and all i just don't enjoy his character. Sabse important toh yeh hai k ek acha character aese kaise bna skte ho k log pasand na karein.

Hopefully I made my points clear now.

A subjudice case doesn't mean that court has agreed to any party. Anyone can claim anything. It is for the court to adjudge. They haven't shown a single family court hearing.

This is itv so they are showing Abhinav's guilt and fears to heighten the drama. You cannot bring in real world legality and then say that show mein toh aisa nahi dikha rahe as per your whims.

Why bring in your real cousin and his personal life into a shit and giggles discussion about a fictional show.

Anyhow, in the real world, Abhir is Akshnav's son and legal heir. In the show too, they have shown the same. The suit isn't about whether Abhinav is a real or fake father in the show. It's about whether Abhir should live with Akshnav or AbhiM.

So this whole fake father real father discourse is moot on this forum

Originally posted by: Deltablues

A subjudice case doesn't mean that court has agreed to any party. Anyone can claim anything. It is for the court to adjudge. They haven't shown a single family court hearing.

This is itv so they are showing Abhinav's guilt and fears to heighten the drama. You cannot bring in real world legality and then say that show mein toh aisa nahi dikha rahe as per your whims.

Why bring in your real cousin and his personal life into a shit and giggles discussion about a fictional show.

Anyhow, in the real world, Abhir is Akshnav's son and legal heir. In the show too, they have shown the same. The suit isn't about whether Abhinav is a real or fake father in the show. It's about whether Abhir should live with Akshnav or AbhiM.

So this whole fake father real father discourse is moot on this forum

Fake father real father came in existence coz of Abhinav only.

@ bold 1 ohh i wish it has enlighten the drama but for it's annoying specially same thing on loop

@bold 2 In real world Abhir is as much as of Son of Abhimanyu as he is of Akshnav. No where i will deny the role of Abhinav in Abhir life and upbringing. (Woh baat alag hai k be it show and be it this forum. Akshara ka hi contribution kam hai in Abhir upbringing)

And about legal heir. If Abhinav ki family hoti, uski property hoti and unko Abhir ki paternity bta hoti and woh agar greedy hote toh Abhir ko ghanta kuch nahi milta unless Abhinav will mein usko mention krta.

And by property i mean ancestral home, land etc.

Abhinav ka bnaya hua like this ghar in kasauli he can name it kisi k bhi naam.

This is bizarre to see that a simple fact you all are ready to accept. Abhimanyu is Abhir's father biologically and whatever reason he was missing in action coz he wasn't informed properly. (Don't come at me with aur kitna try krti AK and all I am team AK hi she did what was best. Self respect bhi hoti hai and AB ka fault tha)

But fact is fact.

Abi agar Abhir ki marrow ki need hoti instead of heart surgery tab Akshara or Abhimanyu check krwate Abhinav nahi. And again I am not saying k Abhinav ne bacha churaya, yeh woh, fake father and all. I don't care aur log kya keh rhe.

I am just stating a simple fact k yes Abhinav is the father of Abhir by actions. But so is Abhimanyu and that guy is also trying to fulfil his responsibilities that he Missed. I don't find him wrong in asking to be a part of the his son's life.

Originally posted by: chaipaani

That is why i keep on saying that personally I am not enjoying his ckt now. Also, it's natural for me to find like-minded people so that I can have a conversation.

The only point so far i have been adamant on is this birth certificate and rights on Abhir in case Akshara isn't in the picture anymore. I made that coz I am sure. I am sure coz I have seen real life cases closely.

Rest obviously everyone have their own opinion.

And i also enjoy a few conversation with people who have different opinion than mine.

And my sabsa bada issue hi I wanted another ML for AK since the first divorce track but he isn't Abhinav.

And no i didn't want a angry young macho type of man.

I wanted these sweet characteristics only but better execution better reasoning. You can be sweet, goofy and mature at the same time. Definitely didn't wish for without any solid reason (atleast for me his reason aren't justified) insecure person.

Ok I know that..

Ab I lost the topic of debate here..so chill..

Matlab..iced tea ban jao😆

Originally posted by: chaipaani

Okay so let's come back to the show now:

1. Akshara isn't denying that AbhiM is the father of Abhir. She herself agreed k haan maine naam likh diya and all.

2. If they were so strong in their legalities. Why fear of AbhiM knowing the truth.

3. AbhiM filed the case it's on hold or withdrawn no idea but it started. Hence, we know that court is agreeing to the fact that AbhiM is the father so in case aage bdhta then it would have come to the fact that kaun deserving. Is par i would say Akshnav hain. Bht ache se rkha hai. I didn't like financials point out krna bhi and as i am vocal now i was then and tab Abhi fans ne bura bnaya tha mereko.

4. I will say it again that there are many loop hools when it comes to fatherly rights. And what AK did was wrong and as i said India mein chal ja rha hai but bahar nahi chalta. As someone who is going to be a lawyer AK ne forgery ki hai in legal documents which is not a crime like umar kaid dedenge and all but it's wrong.

5. And when i said k Abhinav ko incase of AK demise nahi milegi custody I meant it. Abi recently similar case i studied. What happened is father died mother was pregnant in laws ne nikal diya. Mother remarried.

Then years later mother died in laws ko varis ki yaad aayi so case gya court mein yahan in laws galat the still unko right mila and bache ka benefit yeh hua k property mein part.

6. And let's forget other cases coz sabka apna apna point hai. In this case main yahi toh keh rhi hun k Abhimanyu can also prove k bhai mujhe toh miscarriage btaya gya mujhe toh btaya nahi baby hai hence i was missing in action for so many years.

Then also AK did not try enough why i say this coz she is now letting Manjari stay at home, laughing with her, Goenkas k saath party ho rhi hai when all was not so bad toh ap unko visit karke btate.

Yahi loophole bhi PH ne rkha hai just to show dono galat the. Jo in a way the bhi

Is sab mein Abhinav bechara phsa hai and I will never say he is bad person and all i just don't enjoy his character. Sabse important toh yeh hai k ek acha character aese kaise bna skte ho k log pasand na karein.

Hopefully I made my points clear now.

All the questions could be answered by single sentence : It's ITV, that's why 😆

The leap happened so that the fight for custody can happen. That's the masala.

1. Akshara can't deny AbhiM is the BIOLOGICAL father of Abhir because he is😆

I mean if she lies then AbhiM would file for a paternity test and the truth will come out. But LEGAL FATHER is AbhiN as he's the one on the birth certificate.

2. Already mentioned. ITV. And the fear of Abhir knowing and perhaps the fear of AbhiM playing dirty to get his hands on Abhir, which does happen a lot. He's got money, he's got power. Legally she hasn't done anything wrong though.

3. Where has the court agreed he's the father? Maybe the biological father yes but that's it. Abhinav is still his legal father. The next course of action is AbhiM filing for physical custody which he wouldn't get cause a. they have to prove Abhinav is incapable b. their history will come out and that will close the doors for him.

4. India is definitely one of the countries forefront in giving mothers almost an exclusive right to her children. They get to decide the fate of the child. This is because of our domestic abuse rates and female foeticide. It doesn't matter bahar kya chalta hain. We are talking about India.

Bahar toh domestic abuse ke case mein AbhiM jail main hota for white day very swiftly.

Akshara did not do anything illegal. What forgery. Kuch bhi nahi hoga use Indian court main when she spills the reason. She wanted to keep her son safe from the abusive father.

5. Once again it doesn't matter mother remarried or not. What's the name of the father on the birth certificate. If she put in the name of the biological parent, he will be given custody after her death. Also even if a child has another legal guardian/father, he is entitled to the property of the biological parent anyway if paternity can be proven. Property laws are a whole different ballgame compared to custody rights. If the family won custody there must be another reason.. BUT IT'S NOT PRECEDENT.

7. Kyun bataya nahi agar bol diya Akshara ne toh baat khatam lol.

Akshara did not try enough? Are you serious lol. This is victim blaming at its finest. She's letting all that appen now cause this is an ITV show. Also one could say enough time as passed for some wounds to heal. I mean in real life, do you think an Akshara will still call Manjiri 'maa' after what she did to her? Yeh kya point hua😆

The loophole here is only one : domestic abuse by ML is not considered anything on ITV. There's a 'chalta hain' attitude about it. That's the loophole. If ITV had let Akshara rationalize what ex husband really did she would know that in India, an abused wife or ex wife IS NOT morally and most importantly LEGALLY obligated to even tell the husband/ex husband about the birth of their child.

If ITV had let Akshara consider what really happened to her, she would know NO COURT will ever take away from her or give AbhiM any rights. But alas, acknowledgement of spousal domestic abuse and ITV don't know each other.

Infact ITV is so morally bankrupt that ML will not only never go to jail for his behaviour... He would get to play savior and messiah in another domestic abuse case. Oh, the irony of AbhiM saving Shefali from Parth is so disgustingly dark. But that's ITV for you lol.

Originally posted by: OnTheBlock

All the questions could be answered by single sentence : It's ITV, that's why 😆

The leap happened so that the fight for custody can happen. That's the masala.

1. Akshara can't deny AbhiM is the BIOLOGICAL father of Abhir because he is😆

I mean if she lies then AbhiM would file for a paternity test and the truth will come out. But LEGAL FATHER is AbhiN as he's the one on the birth certificate.

2. Already mentioned. ITV. And the fear of Abhir knowing and perhaps the fear of AbhiM playing dirty to get his hands on Abhir, which does happen a lot. He's got money, he's got power. Legally she hasn't done anything wrong though.

3. Where has the court agreed he's the father? Maybe the biological father yes but that's it. Abhinav is still his legal father. The next course of action is AbhiM filing for physical custody which he wouldn't get cause a. they have to prove Abhinav is incapable b. their history will come out and that will close the doors for him.

4. India is definitely one of the countries forefront in giving mothers almost an exclusive right to her children. They get to decide the fate of the child. This is because of our domestic abuse rates and female foeticide. It doesn't matter bahar kya chalta hain. We are talking about India.

Bahar toh domestic abuse ke case mein AbhiM jail main hota for white day very swiftly.

Akshara did not do anything illegal. What forgery. Kuch bhi nahi hoga use Indian court main when she spills the reason. She wanted to keep her son safe from the abusive father.

5. Once again it doesn't matter mother remarried or not. What's the name of the father on the birth certificate. If she put in the name of the biological parent, he will be given custody after her death. Also even if a child has another legal guardian/father, he is entitled to the property of the biological parent anyway if paternity can be proven. Property laws are a whole different ballgame compared to custody rights. If the family won custody there must be another reason.. BUT IT'S NOT PRECEDENT.

7. Kyun bataya nahi agar bol diya Akshara ne toh baat khatam lol.

Akshara did not try enough? Are you serious lol. This is victim blaming at its finest. She's letting all that appen now cause this is an ITV show. Also one could say enough time as passed for some wounds to heal. I mean in real life, do you think an Akshara will still call Manjiri 'maa' after what she did to her? Yeh kya point hua😆

The loophole here is only one : domestic abuse by ML is not considered anything on ITV. There's a 'chalta hain' attitude about it. That's the loophole. If ITV had let Akshara rationalize what ex husband really did she would know that in India, an abused wife or ex wife IS NOT morally and most importantly LEGALLY obligated to even tell the husband/ex husband about the birth of their child.

If ITV had let Akshara consider what really happened to her, she would know NO COURT will ever take away from her or give AbhiM any rights. But alas, acknowledgement of spousal domestic abuse and ITV don't know each other.

Infact ITV is so morally bankrupt that ML will not only never go to jail for his behaviour... He would get to play savior and messiah in another domestic abuse case. Oh, the irony of AbhiM saving Shefali from Parth is so disgustingly dark. But that's ITV for you lol.

Apko pta hai bahar koi banda Abhinav k jaise hum ticket lelete hain karke peeche padh jaata toh usko bhi police maarti.

Originally posted by: OnTheBlock

All the questions could be answered by single sentence : It's ITV, that's why 😆

The leap happened so that the fight for custody can happen. That's the masala.

1. Akshara can't deny AbhiM is the BIOLOGICAL father of Abhir because he is😆

I mean if she lies then AbhiM would file for a paternity test and the truth will come out. But LEGAL FATHER is AbhiN as he's the one on the birth certificate.

2. Already mentioned. ITV. And the fear of Abhir knowing and perhaps the fear of AbhiM playing dirty to get his hands on Abhir, which does happen a lot. He's got money, he's got power. Legally she hasn't done anything wrong though.

3. Where has the court agreed he's the father? Maybe the biological father yes but that's it. Abhinav is still his legal father. The next course of action is AbhiM filing for physical custody which he wouldn't get cause a. they have to prove Abhinav is incapable b. their history will come out and that will close the doors for him.

4. India is definitely one of the countries forefront in giving mothers almost an exclusive right to her children. They get to decide the fate of the child. This is because of our domestic abuse rates and female foeticide. It doesn't matter bahar kya chalta hain. We are talking about India.

Bahar toh domestic abuse ke case mein AbhiM jail main hota for white day very swiftly.

Akshara did not do anything illegal. What forgery. Kuch bhi nahi hoga use Indian court main when she spills the reason. She wanted to keep her son safe from the abusive father.

5. Once again it doesn't matter mother remarried or not. What's the name of the father on the birth certificate. If she put in the name of the biological parent, he will be given custody after her death. Also even if a child has another legal guardian/father, he is entitled to the property of the biological parent anyway if paternity can be proven. Property laws are a whole different ballgame compared to custody rights. If the family won custody there must be another reason.. BUT IT'S NOT PRECEDENT.

7. Kyun bataya nahi agar bol diya Akshara ne toh baat khatam lol.

Akshara did not try enough? Are you serious lol. This is victim blaming at its finest. She's letting all that appen now cause this is an ITV show. Also one could say enough time as passed for some wounds to heal. I mean in real life, do you think an Akshara will still call Manjiri 'maa' after what she did to her? Yeh kya point hua😆

The loophole here is only one : domestic abuse by ML is not considered anything on ITV. There's a 'chalta hain' attitude about it. That's the loophole. If ITV had let Akshara rationalize what ex husband really did she would know that in India, an abused wife or ex wife IS NOT morally and most importantly LEGALLY obligated to even tell the husband/ex husband about the birth of their child.

If ITV had let Akshara consider what really happened to her, she would know NO COURT will ever take away from her or give AbhiM any rights. But alas, acknowledgement of spousal domestic abuse and ITV don't know each other.

Infact ITV is so morally bankrupt that ML will not only never go to jail for his behaviour... He would get to play savior and messiah in another domestic abuse case. Oh, the irony of AbhiM saving Shefali from Parth is so disgustingly dark. But that's ITV for you lol.

Mera mann toh nahi tha par rha nahi gya

By your logic:

Agar sach mein day 1 Abhir ko utha k lejata koi say Abhinav and apna naam likh deta Birth certificate pe toh bhi wahi legal father hota coz BC mein uska name hai.

You should know if Akshara have points against AB and family then so does AB and family have points against them.

I am not able to understand why is Akshara entertaining these oh so bad people.

Why did Abhinav was like surgery k liye bhai ji bhai ki bhai ji

The list was of 10 Doctors.

The way you say anything that other party does is show ki trp k liye.

But whatever AB did is he is a bad person. He should not get even a small part in his son's life who btw is very close to him now.

I think you are what's disgustingly dark is that Abhimanyu is breathing the same air as godlike saviour messiah Abhinav.

Originally posted by: chaipaani

.

Mera mann toh nahi tha par rha nahi gya

By your logic:

Agar sach mein day 1 Abhir ko utha k lejata koi say Abhinav and apna naam likh deta Birth certificate pe toh bhi wahi legal father hota coz BC mein uska name hai.

You should know if Akshara have points against AB and family then so does AB and family have points against them.

I am not able to understand why is Akshara entertaining these oh so bad people.

Why did Abhinav was like surgery k liye bhai ji bhai ki bhai ji

The list was of 10 Doctors.

The way you say anything that other party does is show ki trp k liye.

But whatever AB did is he is a bad person. He should not get even a small part in his son's life who btw is very close to him now.

I think you are what's disgustingly dark is that Abhimanyu is breathing the same air as godlike saviour messiah Abhinav.

I don't know if youre intentionally being obtuse about this or not 😆. I don't think I can explain to in any simpler words but let's try for the last time.

Mother had marital discord with Biological Father where she was ABUSED. She comes out of that hellhole and gives birth to her son while CHOOSING a father for him, someone who cares for the son. That man becomes the LEGAL FATHER.. CHOSEN BY THE MOTHER. That's the most important part. CHOSEN BY THE MOTHER. Not any stranger can become or kidnap someone else to be on the birth certificate. MOTHER CHOOSES.

Biological father gets to know, files for custody. He complains 'My ex kept my son away from me. Gimme my rights'.. Court asks the mother.. 'Why did you keep the son away from his father? On what grounds'. The moment mother says 'On the grounds of domestic abuse' bio father wouldn't ever get custody.

The crux is AbhiM's treatment of Akshara. You cannot claim rights on the child legally or paternity fraud when you have abused the mother. The court would not let AbhiM be the legal father on these grounds. He can have his biological rights. That's the ground reality. You keep bringing up real in between the reel.

Now because this is an ITV show, that abuse part wouldn't be acknowledged. Which is why the custody drama even happened. It's FL vs ML. Akshara being cordial to the Birlas is also because it's ITV.

The issue here is that you keep bringing up the law and legality from real life to establish AbhiM's rights. So let me tell you in real life he would get NONE. That's the truth whether it's digestible to ppl or not.

Only because this is an ITV show, only because the biological father is the ML here is the reason they can do useless custody drama. If the ex husband/bio father was the villain of the show, we would be see a completely different storyline where the FL drags his a_ _ in court and informs them about her abuse and crushes his dreams of custody.

I think problem here is fans don’t accept that white day was actual abuse. In their eyes it’s just a normal thing done out of pain and anger, it wasn’t intentional and it’s a one off thing, while he has done umpteen good things and is still after all these years in love with her.

How many ever logical ways you put it out with ( you being a real lawyer in the real world ), they will try to wiggle away from the truth and facts cos otherwise it’s hard to support a fictional pair abhira. Facts will remain facts.

I love how you put your thoughts across and your writings

Originally posted by: chaipaani

.

Mera mann toh nahi tha par rha nahi gya

By your logic:

Agar sach mein day 1 Abhir ko utha k lejata koi say Abhinav and apna naam likh deta Birth certificate pe toh bhi wahi legal father hota coz BC mein uska name hai.

You should know if Akshara have points against AB and family then so does AB and family have points against them.

I am not able to understand why is Akshara entertaining these oh so bad people.

Why did Abhinav was like surgery k liye bhai ji bhai ki bhai ji

The list was of 10 Doctors.

The way you say anything that other party does is show ki trp k liye.

But whatever AB did is he is a bad person. He should not get even a small part in his son's life who btw is very close to him now.

I think you are what's disgustingly dark is that Abhimanyu is breathing the same air as godlike saviour messiah Abhinav.

You know they did mention that in India, the mother i.e Akshara can choose for the baby. So this false equivalency ki a hypothetical kidnapper would be a child's father by forging his name in the birth certificate is grasping at nonexistent straws. He would be nabbed for kidnapping and possibly human trafficking too.

Abhinav doesn't fit that case.

When did Abhinav stalk Akshara lol? And this is on the forum of a show where the male lead got engaged to girl's sister just to coerce her into a "love confession" lol

Abhinav wanting the best possible, accessible healthcare for his son given that they have family in Udaipur is not a crime. It doesn't nullify his legal claim as Abhir's father. So what was the point

His begging Abhimanyu in the OT to operate on Abhir was ott itv cringe but rambling in a state of distraught doesn't nullify a birth certificate. Parents say "aap hi ka baccha hai" all the time. That doesn't make it literally true. If Abhim brings it up in the court, he'd lose his medical license and Birlas would be in jail

And I did not understand this bin matlab ka victimisation for Abhim. No one has stopped him from meeting Abhir. He can still respectfully coparent without invading Akshnav's privacy.

What more could have Akshara done to make Abhim know of Abhir's existence lol. Travel back to Udaipur without getting her uterus cleaned of a miscarried foetus and beg him to take her back? 🤣