Why is Abhimanyu becoming another Akshara ? - Page 4

Originally posted by: hari15

Akshara is abhir ki maa.

Abhi is abhir ki baap

In between ak is the one who kept nav as her kid ka mooh bola baap.

In all these what obligation does abhi have to tell nav the truth when the one who made him her kid's father is not saying it.

are if they dont bash Abhimanyu, how will they pe side Abhinav,like in serial also writer had to create white day to bring his sunshine friend cum character to the story ,same way to praise abhinav,abhimanyu needs to be bashed,as a standalone character abhinav sharma is nothing

Originally posted by: hari15

Akshara is abhir ki maa.

Abhi is abhir ki baap

In between ak is the one who kept nav as her kid ka mooh bola baap.

In all these what obligation does abhi have to tell nav the truth when the one who made him her kid's father is not saying it.

Exactly ! That’s my point why is he interfering If he doesn’t have any obligations , why does he have to snatch the letter from Abhinav’s hand? What’s his business there? If not Abhinav would have known the truth. He have no right to interfere btwn son and dad as Abhinav is maintaing the same.Abhinav was always there for Abhir from last 6yrs so he have all the rights on him as a father

Originally posted by: sweta2005

are if they dont bash Abhimanyu, how will they pe side Abhinav,like in serial also writer had to create white day to bring his sunshine friend cum character to the story ,same way to praise abhinav,abhimanyu needs to be bashed,as a standalone character abhinav sharma is nothing

First, this is out of character for Abhi. But he has actually hidden stuff before. He usually comes out with it soon, though. Comparing that to Ak hiding things is another thing. Ak usually hides things, creates a fake narrative around them, and defends her lies tooth and nail. Abhi has hidden stuff like his hand issue for a few episodes or Ak's pregnancy issues for a few episodes etc. But it's more passive stuff. He won't lie if asked point blank. But anyways, back to the issue here.

I think if you want to go by what is being shown, they did show Abhi's reason was not to hurt Mr. Sharma. He said Mr. Shrama doesn't deserve this. So I don't think he wants to hide it, just doesn't want the truth to come out in a bad manner where it hurts Nav too much. If you want to say he doesn't care about Nav and stuff, then we are really not watching the same show. He has shown care for Nav on multiple occasions, to the point where there is a ship called NavManyu. So I think Abhi wants Ak to handle all of this her way. He is trying to be better. He is trying to show some form of redemption etc. And for him, the only way to do that is for Ak to take the reins.

As to why is he doing that without Ak asking? Because they did communicate about that. When Ak got done with the exam, both Abhi and Ak looked at each other and then decided to lie about Ak getting late for the exam. Then when the Sharma fam got home, there was again an expression from Ak to Abhi. It is open to interpretation, but my interpretation is that there were enough signals from Ak that she wanted Abhi to keep quiet. Even now, Ak isn't sharing the fact that Abhi helped with the Kaiaan thing or how much she and Abhi have discussed things.

I don't think Abhi actively wants to harm Navra's relationship by this. It's not his fault that Ak has hidden this from Nav. Infact, how would he even do that? I think in some other instances I do think he is subconsciously trying, like when he confessed to Ak about losing his love cause of his mistakes or when he had that argument with Nav about second chances.

Originally posted by: Chaitu.V

aare its the same way how u defend a toxic ML and bash Abhinav for just helping a women who was kicked by her husband immediately after the miscarriage . On top of that abuse makers too.. they r in the tv industry for ages so they know who is what and who is nothing so they introduced Abinav’s character to fetch the Trp’s which were dipped by the previous tracks.

I think people have always defended Abhi from the beginning. Nobody needed Nav to make Abhi more interesting. Just Abhira alone were enough. But in Nav's case, his character has been written to play the opposite of Abhi and show the "good side" to the audience.

Originally posted by: Chaitu.V

Abhinav is also Abhi’s baap. Adopted dad’s are also considered as dad’s when they take care more than blood related.

Exactly ! That’s my point why is he interfering If he doesn’t have any obligations , why does he have to snatch the letter from Abhinav’s hand? What’s his business there? If not Abhinav would have known the truth. He have no right to interfere btwn son and dad as Abhinav is maintaing the same.Abhinav was always there for Abhir from last 6yrs so he have all the rights on him as a father

Right. Abhimanyu and abhinav have equal responsibilities as fathers to abhir. One as bio and the other who brought him up in all these 6 years with love.

Nav kept abhir truth with him for 6 years even when they became friends, even when he came to know abhi is grieving for his dead kids.

If that drunken convo between nav and abhi didn't happen would truth have come out that easily. Nav easily ended it saying we thought you are happy in your world don't want to distrub you.

Same now both abhi and ak saw how restless nav becomes with abhir truth. Ak herself said she doesn't want him to see like before and abhi said sharma ji doesn't deserve this.

Pretty much makers have kept both fathers in same place to get their emotions out after truth.

Originally posted by: hari15

Right. Abhimanyu and abhinav have equal responsibilities as fathers to abhir. One as bio and the other who brought him up in all these 6 years with love.

Nav kept abhir truth with him for 6 years even when they became friends, even when he came to know abhi is grieving for his dead kids.

If that drunken convo between nav and abhi didn't happen would truth have come out that easily. Nav easily ended it saying we thought you are happy in your world don't want to distrub you.

Same now both abhi and ak saw how restless nav becomes with abhir truth. Ak herself said she doesn't want him to see like before and abhi said sharma ji doesn't deserve this.

Pretty much makers have kept both fathers in same place to get their emotions out after truth.

I know he did it with a good intention not to hurt Nav but when Ak did the same he had problem with that ? She have her own reasons too right when she did that? When it comes to him the rules change ?

Why ru asking obvious questions ?

When it comes to abhinav , he should be one telling abhirs truth to abhim on the phone 6 yrs back , he should be the one to not marry akshu bec she "was" abhimanyus property , he should be the one to reveal abhirs truth to abhim post the leap , he should be the one giving manjaris vanshaj back to Birlas 🤪 Of course it was abhinavs prerogative ..

In this case , baat abhimanyu ki hai. The great Dr Birla. He is allowed to lie , hide , run away , cry in his mom's pallu, basically he is allowed to be an ass bec he is handsome . Akshu or abhinav are not allowed anything bec they are good people and hence they should be at at Dr birlas service..jab Dr Birla ka mann Kare divorce deke ghar se Niklo jab Dr Birla bole wapas aa jao .n pests like abhin must stay away bec mummy doesn't like him.

Originally posted by: lagjagale

I think people have always defended Abhi from the beginning. Nobody needed Nav to make Abhi more interesting. Just Abhira alone were enough. But in Nav's case, his character has been written to play the opposite of Abhi and show the "good side" to the audience.

You see this bias or hate against Abhinav stems from the fact that he is nowhere in standing in comparison to the great Dr. Birla. He is just a driver with meagre means yet he is more magnanimous and chivalrous than him, and AbM can’t compete against him.

If he were rich, suave and handsome with same characteristics of poor AbN many would have started gushing about him. The hatred against AbN originates from the inherent bias against those who lacking in means.