TERE BIN -Yumna Zaidi - Wahaj Ali DT#121 (DT Note pg 100) - Page 56

https://twitter.com/meerassim/status/1666131400133685256?s=46&t=LLvl6XFDwu-94mD1SGUJJg

Originally posted by: Moonks

she didn’t her word that script demanded it was in the regard when MK slapped Mee, her words that it has happened before was in regard with faulty script and when interviewer asked her about bedroom scenes so she said that she hasn’t wrote anything new they have shown it on ptv before, ML-FL sleeping on same bed and what not and her words that Mohabbat sab maaf kar deti hai was for Murtasim, she clearly said that ki Mohabbat ka yahi jazba hai isiliye Mu Meerub ko humesha maaf kar deta hai aur karta rahega.

Anyone who doesn’t believe it can watch the interview and then read that interview as well to see how her words have taken to show their narrative was right.

If you are talking about Fuchsia interview I already watched it. But if it is another interview then give me the link.

Originally posted by: CranberryQueen

This whole thread ♥️🦋

https://twitter.com/fahbury/status/1665798905462681601?s=46&t=LLvl6XFDwu-94mD1SGUJJg

Now I can't see it.. tweet is unavailable 🙈

Originally posted by: CranberryQueen

This’ll never get old..

https://twitter.com/_00n_i/status/1665870346279350274?s=46&t=LLvl6XFDwu-94mD1SGUJJg

The high definition

Originally posted by: pressu

I think the first time it was not SA and the second time it was SA in Raaz-e-Ulfat. And the actor clearly said it.

I think NM wrote MR. And I believe that it was shot as MR. Due to the public pressure they changed it.

If she didn't write MR she would not share this post.

From the article:

Makhdoom pointed out the content team or 7th Sky production house did not object to the storyline.

She revealed that the scene had been tweaked before filming, as she had not initially included the spitting and slapping. However, she took complete responsibility for the script.

I have been of the MR happened school because of Merub and Murtasim's reactions. In E47, Merub's body language, expressions, trauma was coded as SA. Murtasim's extreme guilt - the sheesha tod phor - was too extreme for consensual sex (CS) I felt. I never used articles as basis for my reasoning as most had clickbait headings but if you go to the source text, the reference would be to something else - not MR.

But knowing now that in the past, Siraj has set up these SA or no SA scenarios - and made the girl act like she got raped even though SA did not happen - I am wondering whether Merub's and Murtasim's reactions are reliable cues anymore to interpret what originally happened. Like he did in Raaz-e-Ulfat, what if Siraj briefed YZ in tere bin to act the rape victim to set up the MR hook / suspense plot, even though MR did not happen?

Originally posted by: hypnotoad

I have been of the MR happened school because of Merub and Murtasim's reactions. In E47, Merub's body language, expressions, trauma was coded as SA. Murtasim's extreme guilt - the sheesha tod phor - was too extreme for consensual sex (CS) I felt. I never used articles as basis for my reasoning as most had clickbait headings but if you go to the source text, the reference would be to something else - not MR.

But knowing now that in the past, Siraj has set up these SA or no SA scenarios - and made the girl act like she got raped even though SA did not happen - I am wondering whether Merub's and Murtasim's reactions are reliable cues anymore to interpret what originally happened. Like he did in Raaz-e-Ulfat, what if Siraj briefed YZ in tere bin to act the rape victim to set up the MR hook / suspense plot, even though MR did not happen?

@Bold: Her reactions were valid in both the scenes. In the first scene, she was unconscious and the guy also didn't clear what happened to her. And in the second scene she was A and she was in her senses. And the actor clearly said that the in the second scene it was SA.

Originally posted by: hypnotoad

I have been of the MR happened school because of Merub and Murtasim's reactions. In E47, Merub's body language, expressions, trauma was coded as SA. Murtasim's extreme guilt - the sheesha tod phor - was too extreme for consensual sex (CS) I felt. I never used articles as basis for my reasoning as most had clickbait headings but if you go to the source text, the reference would be to something else - not MR.

But knowing now that in the past, Siraj has set up these SA or no SA scenarios - and made the girl act like she got raped even though SA did not happen - I am wondering whether Merub's and Murtasim's reactions are reliable cues anymore to interpret what originally happened. Like he did in Raaz-e-Ulfat, what if Siraj briefed YZ in tere bin to act the rape victim to set up the MR hook / suspense plot, even though MR did not happen?

Exactly!! This siraj guy is the culprit i feel.. If he has done this in his previous show, he might have added it here to create the dramatic suspense of MR/No MR which obviously fell flat on his face...

@bold, i too feel the same. He probably have different briefing to the actors .. yumna and wahaj weren't in the same frame after that episode and their reaction except the said episode doesn't indicate MR..

It is like they left it as a cliff hanger to confuse us..I hope they address it properly in the upcoming episodes..If it required them to reshoot those episodes they should have done it ..They obviously got 10 times more than what they invested so it won't be a problem..

Originally posted by: pressu

@Bold: Her reactions were valid in both the scenes. In the first scene, she was unconscious and the guy also didn't clear what happened to her. And in the second scene she was A and she was in her senses. And the actor clearly said that the in the second scene it was SA.

OH. So you think Siraj lied in his IV when he said that SA did not happen the second time (though the actor said it did)?

But I do want to add that in the Raaz-e-Ulfat DT, IFers were confused and discussed whether SA happened or not. Whether creating this SA or no SA mystery was intentional or not (irrespective of what really happened) by Siraj, I dunno.

Originally posted by: pressu

The post which she shared clearly mentioned MR. Why did she share it when the heading clearly indicated MR, if she didn't write it? When she saw the heading, why didn't she clear it if she felt that the article misquoted her?

Originally posted by: Moonks

she didn’t her word that script demanded it was in the regard when MK slapped Mee, her words that it has happened before was in regard with faulty script and when interviewer asked her about bedroom scenes so she said that she hasn’t wrote anything new they have shown it on ptv before, ML-FL sleeping on same bed and what not and her words that Mohabbat sab maaf kar deti hai was for Murtasim, she clearly said that ki Mohabbat ka yahi jazba hai isiliye Mu Meerub ko humesha maaf kar deta hai aur karta rahega.

Anyone who doesn’t believe it can watch the interview and then read that interview as well to see how her words have taken to show their narrative was right.