Originally posted by: Gayathrirau
This is my opinion. Not trying to be offensive to anyone. Just my thoughts from scanning the forum.
I saw ur post in the previous forum regarding Ayesha suffering because Neil doesn't want to continue. Couple of things, it is not necessary that Ayesha had to quit because of Neil leaving the show as they could have shown Sai Satya pairing continuing like they did with tamarind show (Aryan and imlie). So it honestly must be that the show is taking a leap and the leads don't want to play an older character which makes sense as they are at their prime rn and don't want to play those roles which is why tamarind show leads also quit the show.
Secondly, from writers perspective, they don't much plot left to continue other than gen leap. The conflict with these children is sairat conflict, kids realizing that Sai virat are their parents and vinu accepting sai as his mother. Most of these have been explored and is being tied up. There isnt much plot to explore that can stretch the current gen for years. Maybe exploring sai satya would extend for few months but according to you guys, he is a saint compared to virat so then there wouldn't be conflict between the couple which means that plot will end quickly too.
Max they can stretch for a few months. So the leap is inevitable. It's better to take a leap practically and financially for PH when one of the lead's contract is finishing (whoevers contract finishes first- this happened to be Neil because he was casted first. ) They expected to run this sai satya virat triangle but I think it wasnt received as well as before. This can be seen as they tried to bring parallel to sai virat pkahi but then decided to fasten the realization and now sai might realize satyas feeling. So they started to fasten the plot and end by the contract expiration.
I don't think blaming NB for this is fair. He doesn't write the script. You can hate virats character as much as you want but should keep NB away from that. I am not his fan but some of the comments in social media regarding him is very vile and hurtful. We can critisize the character virat but should stop there. This goes with satya and HA as well.
You also mentioned that sais character is being written off to make virat a hero. But I would argue that virats character has been written off since the beginning to bring importance to sai and pakhi. In order to have the triangle more prominent, they butchered virats character since beginning. Sai has also done some pretty messed up shit in the earlier days that were glossed over (like devkit hurried marriage without anyone's permission, Mahabaleshwar, etc.) I am not saying that she has done as much mistake as virat but she was also not a saint. Virats redemption was butchered to give pakhi character more ss again to emphasis the triangle. The writers didn't give redemption track for anyone whether it is sai, virat or pakhi. Their mistakes were whitewashed for the sake of drama and timeline. That is the writers fault.
1.7k